Figure - available from: Cancer Control
This content is subject to copyright.
Sensitivity analyses and funnel plots of the impact of higher pretreatment CTCs status detected by CellSearch on prognosis in patients with SCLC. (A, B) sensitivity analyses of the impact of higher pretreatment CTCs level detected by CellSearch on OS (A) and PFS (B); (C, D) funnel plots of the impact of higher pretreatment CTCs status detected by CellSearch on OS (C) and PFS (D). CTCs, circulating tumor cells; SCLC, small cell lung cancer; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
Source publication
Objectives
Numerous studies have elucidated that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have significant prognostic value in various solid tumors. However, the prognostic value of CTCs in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains controversial. The current study was performed to investigate the prognostic significance of different time points of CTCs in SCLC....
Similar publications
Background:
T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) is a recently identified immunosuppressive receptor. The expression levels of TIGIT affect the prognosis of patients with solid tumors. To fully comprehend the role of TIGIT on the prognosis of patients with solid tumors, we conducted a meta-analysis.
Methods:
We performed an online searc...
Citations
... A meta-analysis of 16 studies found a high CTC number pre-and post-therapy correlated with poor OS despite significant heterogeneity among the studies (I 2 = 81.8-87.1%) [44]. ...
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive cancer with a dismal 5‐year survival of < 7%, despite the addition of immunotherapy to first‐line chemotherapy. Specific tumor biomarkers, such as delta‐like ligand 3 (DLL3) and schlafen11 (SLFN11), may enable the selection of more efficacious, novel immunomodulating targeted treatments like bispecific T‐cell engaging monoclonal antibodies (tarlatamab) and chemotherapy with PARP inhibitors. However, obtaining a tissue biopsy sample can be challenging in SCLC. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have the potential to provide molecular insights into a patient's cancer through a “simple” blood test. CTCs have been studied for their prognostic ability in SCLC; however, their value in guiding treatment decisions is yet to be elucidated. This review explores novel and promising targeted therapies in SCLC, summarizes current knowledge of CTCs in SCLC, and discusses how CTCs can be utilized for precision medicine.
... CTCs seem highly promising for clinical cancer management, based on their non-invasive, easily repeatable, and dynamic realtime monitoring analysis (145). Additional CTC markers have been explored in NSCLC patients treated by ICI. ...
Lung cancer remains the first cause of cancer-related death despite many therapeutic innovations, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). ICI are now well used in daily practice at late metastatic stages and locally advanced stages after a chemo-radiation. ICI are also emerging in the peri-operative context. However, all patients do not benefit from ICI and even suffer from additional immune side effects. A current challenge remains to identify patients eligible for ICI and benefiting from these drugs. Currently, the prediction of ICI response is only supported by Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor expression with perfectible results and limitations inherent to tumor-biopsy specimen analysis. Here, we reviewed alternative markers based on liquid biopsy and focused on the most promising biomarkers to modify clinical practice, including non-tumoral blood cell count such as absolute neutrophil counts, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio. We also discussed soluble-derived immune checkpoint-related products such as sPD-L1, circulating tumor cells (detection, count, and marker expression), and circulating tumor DNA-related products. Finally, we explored perspectives for liquid biopsies in the immune landscape and discussed how they could be implemented into lung cancer management with a potential biological–driven decision.
... Lung cancer is the most frequent cause of tumor death worldwide. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive and deadly malignant tumor, accounting for approximately 10% to 15% of all lung cancers (1)(2)(3). SCLC comprises an estimated 250,000 new cases and at least 200,000 deaths worldwide each year (4). Approximately 70% of the patients are diagnosed with extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) with poor overall survival (OS) (5). ...
Background
Patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have high recurrence rates and bleak prognosis. This multicenter real-world study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC.
Methods
Pathologically confirmed ES-SCLC patients receiving anlotinib plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy as the first-line treatment were enrolled in this retrospective study. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse reactions. The Cox regression analyses were employed to investigate the independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS of these individuals.
Results
In total, 58 patients were included in this study. The median PFS was 6.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.5-8.5], and the median OS was 10.5 months (95%CI 8.7-12.3). Thirty-four patients achieved partial response (PR), 18 patients achieved stable disease (SD), and 6 patients achieved progressive disease (PD). The ORR and DCR were 58.6% and 89.6%. The main treatment-related adverse reactions were generally tolerated. Myelosuppression (44.8%) was the most common adverse reaction, followed by hypertension (41.4%), fatigue (34.5%), gastrointestinal reaction (32.7%), and hand-foot syndrome (24.1%). Multivariate analysis showed that post-medication hand-foot syndrome [PFS 8.5 vs. 5.5 months, Hazards Ratio (HR)=0.23, 95%CI 0.07-0.72, P =0.012] was the independent predictor of PFS, and hypertension (OS 15.9 vs. 8.3 months, HR=0.18, 95%CI 0.05-0.58, P =0.005) was the independent predictor of OS.
Conclusion
Anlotinib combined with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for ES-SCLC appears to be effective and well-tolerated in the real-world. Well-designed large-scale prospective studies are urgently needed in the future to verify our findings.
... 134 The analysis of CTC number at baseline and at different time points in the course of SCLC was referred to for the prediction and monitoring of the response to chemotherapy. 135 Circulating tumor cells obtained from plasma samples may be also used for the detection of specific mutations related to lung cancer, such as EGFR 136 and KRAS, 137 with a higher sensitivity than ctDNA. Moreover, specific gene rearrangements can be detected in CTCs with promising acurracy. ...
Lung cancer is one of the most common neoplasms and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Despite recent progress in understanding the pathomechanisms of lung cancer, it is frequently associated with late diagnosis, high incidence of metastases and poor response to treatment. Thus, there is extensive research in the field of biomarkers that aims to optimize management of lung cancer. The aim of this study was to review the current perspectives of a wide spectrum of circulating molecules that seem promising as new potential biomarkers of lung cancer. Among these, biochemical (active proteins), immunological (immunocompetent cells, cytokines, chemokines, and antibodies) and genetic (circulating tumor DNA, cell-free DNA and microRNA) markers are presented and discussed. The use of these markers would support the early detection of lung cancer and might be used for predicting disease progression, response of the disease to targeted therapies, monitoring the course of treatment, and developing individualized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Special attention was given to potential markers of nervous system involvement in the course of lung cancer, due to its prevalence and devastating impact. Limitations of the potential biomarkers are also outlined and future directions of investigations in this field highlighted, with the aim of improving the accuracy and practical utility of these biomarkers.
... Furthermore, at this juncture, we have a real field to maneuver, as many studies have indicated that both structures with high sensitivity and specificity can be used as a liquid biopsy in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients' outcomes and responses to treatment [36,44,91]. Nevertheless, many meta-analyses have confirmed the unique diagnostic and prognostic value of CTCs [92][93][94][95]. The same properties are attributed by meta-analyses to circulating EVs [96][97][98][99]. ...
Liquid biopsies do promise a lot, but are they keeping it? In the past decade, additional novel biomarkers qualified to be called like that, of which, some took necessary hurdles resulting in FDA approval and clinical use. Some others are since a while around, well known and were once regarded to be a game changer in cancer diagnosis or cancer screening. But, during their clinical use limitations were observed from statistical significance and questions raised regarding their robustness, that eventually led to be dropped from associated clinical guidelines for certain applications including cancer diagnosis. The purpose of this review isn't to give a broad overview of all current liquid biopsy as biomarkers, weight them and promise a brighter future in cancer prevention, but rather to take a deeper look on two of those who do qualify to be called liquid biopsies now or then. These two are probably of greatest interest conceptually and methodically, and likely have the highest chances to be in clinical use soon, with a portfolio extension over their original conceptual usage. We aim to dig deeper beyond cancer diagnosis or cancer screening. Actually, we aim to review in depth extracellular vesicles (EVs) and compare with circulating tumour cells (CTCs). The latter methodology is partially FDA approved and in clinical use. We will lay out similarities as taking advantage of surface antigens on EVs and CTCs in case of characterization and quantification. But drawing readers' attention to downstream application based on capture/isolation methodology and simply on their overall nature, here apparently being living material eventually recoverable as CTCs are vs. dead material with transient effects on recipient cell as in case of EVs. All this we try to bring in perspective, compare and conclude towards which future direction we are aiming for, or should aim for. Do we announce a winner between CTCs vs EVs? No, but we provide good reasons to intensify research on them.
