Figure 5 - uploaded by Edward Melcer
Content may be subject to copyright.
Russell’s valence -arousal model. 

Russell’s valence -arousal model. 

Source publication
Research
Full-text available
This paper introduces a constructive and collaborative digital, multi-touch instrument for tactile evaluation of user experiences with interactive systems. We are developing a tool that allows individuals or groups to digitally construct affective objects that represent their own personal mappings of emotions to shape characteristics. Our approach...

Context in source publication

Context 1
... models of emotion are primarily concerned with mapping an affective response to a single valence emotion. This approach to affect has mainly resulted in circumplex models, such as Rus sell’s valence -arousal model [ 13] (see Figure 5), that treat negative and positive valence as opposite ends of the same spectrum. While such models are sufficient for many affective measurement tools, the complex, multi- layered, and time sensitive nature of an interactive experience (or story) requires a more expressive model. Specifically, we need a model that accounts for the simultaneous experience of opposite-valence emotions (i.e. mixed emotions [8]) and cultural/contextual differences. For instance, a user could enjoy manipulating interface controls of some system but greatly dislike the sound effects associated with their use. Traditional models and tools would likely map the overall experience to only a positive or negative emotion rather than grasp the concurrent, highly positive and negative affect occurring throughout the experience. To address this issue, we altered Russell’s circumplex valence -arousal model by splitting the valence dimension into separate positive and negative dimensions. We then placed arousal, negative valence, and positive valence at right angles to form the Valence-Arousal Cube (see Figure 2). The Valence-Arousal Cube offers three distinct advantages for construction of the CSEI. First, primary emotions from Russell’s model can still be reached along the cube’s edges. Second, mixed emotions fall towards the center of the cube and can be reached through combinations of positive and negative valence. These combinations represent affect that is ambiguous, eliciting a context and culture based interpretation from the user. Third, separating valence into its atomic dimensions allows us to associate distinct affective manipulations of shape with each dimension, resulting in an Affective Shape Cube (see Figure 3 and Table 1). The Affective Shape Cube quantifies ways in which shapes can be manipulated to evoke affective response. By transforming a shape along affective dimensions of the cube, a variety of primary and mixed emotion objects can be created. It is important to note that the Affective Shape Cube only maps shape to affective response. The actual interpretation of emotion evoked by shape is left to the individual, context, and culture. However, shapes that fall along points closer to the faces of the cube are far more likely to have a universal interpretation than ambiguous shapes that lay closer to the center of the cube. E.g. the anteater and spiky SEI objects correlate to anger and surprise trans-culturally because the majority of shape transformations are along arousal and negative valence dimensions, placing them near the arousal/negative valence face. On the other hand, the barba papa SEI object has conflicting dimensional transformations (asymmetry vs. smooth extrusion) which places it towards the center of the cube and leaves interpretation more to context and culture (see Figure 6). This may explain why the barba papa was confusing and unused by Swedish test subjects since there was no cultural equivalent [5]. The exact details of how the CSEI tool should function or be used during tactile evaluation scenarios is still unclear, and even what scenarios may be best for such a tool needs further exploration. Ultimately, we want to examine what people create with the CSEI tool to first refine the instrument, and then focus on exploring the proper usage scenarios. As such, we are currently conducting a study employing a Wizard of Oz mockup of the CSEI system using clay. Our goal in this study is to verify and refine the Affective Shape Cube, and determine manipulations/gestures necessary for individual and group utilization of the CSEI. We then plan to prototype the initial CSEI and conduct user evaluations of the CSEI in tests with individuals, groups, and finally children. We should have results from the current study, and the preliminary prototype, to present at this ...

Citations

Chapter
The image is a basis of any piece of art. This research work envisages the nature of artistic images manifestation, the mechanism of sensory perception and creation of the image‐bearing solution in the designer project activities. The hierarchy of sensory images is represented and the stages of project image formation are distinguished. The historical examples of symbolization of archetypical foretypes and systematization of images arising in the consciousness of the designer in the course of projecting are analyzed. The relationship between the elements of project image structure is introduced, and the process of creation of the new forms such as environment project images, costume style solutions and conceptual ideas of visual data presentation is illustrated. The image concentrates the designer consciousness and forms the inner world of the personality. The language of the images appears in the copies, associations, prints, stamps, and symbols providing the visual information without a word. It is very symbolic, polysemic and contradictory. It is supported by the archetypical symbols and often connected with the ethnic culture and traditions developed in the different art genres.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
We build upon recent research designing a constructive, multi-touch emotional assessment tool and present preliminary qualitative results from a Wizard of Oz study simulating the tool with clay. Our results showed the importance of emotionally contextualized spatial orientations, manipulations, and interactions of real world objects in the constructive process, and led to the identification of two new affective dimensions for the tool.