Figure 1 - uploaded by Amit K. Tiwari
Content may be subject to copyright.
Role of PARP1 in DNA repair: DNA damage activates PARP1 enzyme resulting in homodimerization of the enzyme. Then the DNA binding domain of PARP-1 binds to the damaged DNA and consumes Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD + ) as a 

Role of PARP1 in DNA repair: DNA damage activates PARP1 enzyme resulting in homodimerization of the enzyme. Then the DNA binding domain of PARP-1 binds to the damaged DNA and consumes Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD + ) as a 

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
Poly (ADP­ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) protein plays an important role in the repair of single strand breaks (SSBs) in the DNA. This is mediated by base excision repair (BER) of SSBs. PARP-1 inhibition allows accumulation of SSBs and consequently double strand breaks (DSBs). PARP inhibitors disrupt the BER and causes cell damage and death, especia...

Contexts in source publication

Context 1
... is a chromatin-bound nuclear enzyme involved in the detection and damaged-DNA repair pathway, importantly the base excision repair (BER) of single strand breaks (SSBs). [2] PARP constitute a family of cell signaling enzymes which catalyzes the poly(ADP- ribosyl)ation of DNA-binding proteins and have emerged as critical regulatory components of the immediate cellular response to DNA damage ( Figure 1). This protein plays a key role in maintaining genome integrity through modulation of multiple cellular responses (including base excision repair, necrosis and apoptosis) in the face of genotoxic stress [3,4]. ...
Context 2
... poly (ADP) ribosylation, PARP-1 utilizes NAD + to synthesize poly (ADP)-ribose units either on itself or on a variety of nuclear target proteins such as histones, topoisomerases, DNA polymerases and DNA ligases (Figure 1). This results in highly negative charged nuclear proteins, which in turn leads to the unwinding and repair of the damaged DNA through the base excision repair (BER) pathway. ...
Context 3
... American Cancer Society (ACS) recently estimated that over 600,000 of Americans are projected to die, whereas 1600,000 new cancer cases would be diagnosed in 2013. Recent discoveries of novel-targeted therapies have revolutionized the oncology treatment in the last decade. Traditional anticancer agents were limited due to their non-selectivity towards cancer cells, drug resistance and that they had a very narrow therapeutic window, which limited their use due to unfavorable toxicities to normal cells. Therefore, novel-targeted agents have proved beneficial and have significantly improved the patient survival. This has also been possible due to our better understanding of drug-drug interactions and considerably improved efficacy of clinical anticancer agents when used in combination chemotherapy. The objective has been to multi- target the cancer cells to limit development of resistance, while designing compounds that possess maximum activity with the least or no cross-resistance, and that in conjunction the two agents will demonstrate synergy, or improved effectiveness than when they were used as monotherapies. Combining Poly(ADP- ribose)polymerase-1 (PARP-1) inhibitors with cytotoxic agents such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy is synergistic in many preclinical models. With novel and selective mechanisms of action, PARP-1 inhibitors have moved from the laboratory to the clinic in just the last few years. PARP exist in 17 isoforms, and have been characterized based on sequence homology within the catalytic domain[1] and amongst them, PARP-1 is the first to be characterized and perhaps best known member of the PARP family. PARP-1 accounts for more than 90% of cellular PARP activity. PARP-1 is a chromatin-bound nuclear enzyme involved in the detection and damaged-DNA repair pathway, importantly the base excision repair (BER) of single strand breaks (SSBs).[2] PARP constitute a family of cell signaling enzymes which catalyzes the poly(ADP- ribosyl)ation of DNA-binding proteins and have emerged as critical regulatory components of the immediate cellular response to DNA damage (Figure 1). This protein plays a key role in maintaining genome integrity through modulation of multiple cellular responses (including base excision repair, necrosis and apoptosis) in the face of genotoxic stress [3,4]. ADP-ribosylation reactions are involved in many physiological and pathophysiological processes, including inter- and intracellular signaling, transcription, DNA repair pathways, cell cycle regulation, and mitosis, as well as necrosis and apoptosis [5]. PARP-1, the founding member of the PARP family, is a molecular sensor of DNA breaks, playing a key role in the spatial and temporal organization of break repair through the local synthesis of poly (ADP-ribose) (PAR) at damaged sites, and were expressed at high levels throughout the embryo. Only Parp-1 and Parp-2 have been shown to be activated by DNA strand breaks [6]. PARP-9 [B-aggressive lymphoma-1 (BAL-1), macro PARP] has recently been discovered in patients with certain types of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) and described as a new nuclear protein encoded by the BAL gene, which is expressed in the thymus and specific regions (neuroepithelium) of the brain and gut [7]. PARP-14 is weakly expressed, mainly in the thymus during development and in adulthood, it is essentially co-expressed with PARP-9. During poly (ADP) ribosylation, PARP-1 utilizes NAD + to synthesize poly (ADP)-ribose units either on itself or on a variety of nuclear target proteins such as histones, topoisomerases, DNA polymerases and DNA ligases (Figure 1). This results in highly negative charged nuclear proteins, which in turn leads to the unwinding and repair of the damaged DNA through the base excision repair (BER) pathway. PARP inhibitors offer potential therapies for a wide variety of diseases such as inflammatory conditions, diabetes complications, neurological diseases, stroke and myocardial infarction [8-11]. However, presently, the most prominent clinical role for PARP inhibitors lies within the field of oncology especially the breast cancer susceptibility proteins (BRCA) resistant breast and ovarian cancers. Inhibition of PARP sensitizes tumor cells to cytotoxic drugs that induce DNA damage that would normally be repaired through the BER pathway. PARP-1 inhibitors have consistently demonstrated potentiating effects on the DNA- alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) in preclinical studies, including experimental models of solid tumors such as glioma, melanoma, colorectal, and breast cancer. PARP-1 inhibitors have been demonstrated to sensitize tumors to DNA-alkylating agents (TMZ The majority and cyclophosphamide) of the inhibitors as of well PARP-1 as topoisomerase contain either I poisons free or such cyclic as amide camptothecin in their structures and irinotecan (Figure 2). (CPT-11) Molecular [4,12-15]. insight The PARP-1 between counteracts the PARP-1 camptothecin and the inhibitors action has by been facilitating shown resealing to bind of with DNA the catalytic strand breaks.[14,16] domain of PARP-1 Hence, with PARP-1 “conserved” inhibition and hampers “unconserved” topoisomerase-I interactions. activity Conserved favoring interactions the toxic effects include of two the enzyme lone pair poisons. electrons Indeed, of the preclinical carbonyl oxygen in vivo atom studies of amide have shown forms that two critical the combination hydrogen bonds, of the one PARP-1 with the inhibitor side chain CEP-6800 hydroxyl and of CPT-11 significantly reduces tumor volume of HT-29 colon carcinoma subcutaneous xenografts compared to CPT-11 monotherapy [13]. TMZ is a second-generation DNA-alkylating agent and although TMZ was not effective in a phase II clinical trial against metastatic breast cancer as a monotherapy [17]. It is currently in phase II clinical trial in combination with the PARP-1 inhibitor AG014699 from Pfizer [18,19] and demonstrated promising results in a phase I trial [19]. The majority of the inhibitors of PARP-1 contain either free or cyclic amide in their structures (Figure 2). Molecular insight between the PARP-1 and the inhibitors has been shown to bind with the catalytic domain of PARP-1 with “conserved” and “unconserved” interactions. Conserved interactions include two lone pair electrons of the carbonyl oxygen atom of amide forms two critical hydrogen bonds, one with the side chain hydroxyl of Ser904 and the second with the backbone - NH of Gly863 (Figure 3). The - NH of the amide usually are involved in hydrogen bonding interaction with the backbone carbonyl oxygen atom of Gly863. Electron rich phenol side chain of Tyr907 is found to have critical role in the interactions with phenyl portion of the ligands in face-to-face, π - π interactions as shown in our previous published report [20]. Unconserved interactions include the other interactions present with the inhibitors based on their structures. Thus there is sufficient preclinical and clinical evidence to support the notion that combined inhibition of PARP enzyme in conjunction with ...
Context 4
... American Cancer Society (ACS) recently estimated that over 600,000 of Americans are projected to die, whereas 1600,000 new cancer cases would be diagnosed in 2013. Recent discoveries of novel-targeted therapies have revolutionized the oncology treatment in the last decade. Traditional anticancer agents were limited due to their non-selectivity towards cancer cells, drug resistance and that they had a very narrow therapeutic window, which limited their use due to unfavorable toxicities to normal cells. Therefore, novel-targeted agents have proved beneficial and have significantly improved the patient survival. This has also been possible due to our better understanding of drug-drug interactions and considerably improved efficacy of clinical anticancer agents when used in combination chemotherapy. The objective has been to multi- target the cancer cells to limit development of resistance, while designing compounds that possess maximum activity with the least or no cross-resistance, and that in conjunction the two agents will demonstrate synergy, or improved effectiveness than when they were used as monotherapies. Combining Poly(ADP- ribose)polymerase-1 (PARP-1) inhibitors with cytotoxic agents such as chemotherapy or radiation therapy is synergistic in many preclinical models. With novel and selective mechanisms of action, PARP-1 inhibitors have moved from the laboratory to the clinic in just the last few years. PARP exist in 17 isoforms, and have been characterized based on sequence homology within the catalytic domain[1] and amongst them, PARP-1 is the first to be characterized and perhaps best known member of the PARP family. PARP-1 accounts for more than 90% of cellular PARP activity. PARP-1 is a chromatin-bound nuclear enzyme involved in the detection and damaged-DNA repair pathway, importantly the base excision repair (BER) of single strand breaks (SSBs).[2] PARP constitute a family of cell signaling enzymes which catalyzes the poly(ADP- ribosyl)ation of DNA-binding proteins and have emerged as critical regulatory components of the immediate cellular response to DNA damage (Figure 1). This protein plays a key role in maintaining genome integrity through modulation of multiple cellular responses (including base excision repair, necrosis and apoptosis) in the face of genotoxic stress [3,4]. ADP-ribosylation reactions are involved in many physiological and pathophysiological processes, including inter- and intracellular signaling, transcription, DNA repair pathways, cell cycle regulation, and mitosis, as well as necrosis and apoptosis [5]. PARP-1, the founding member of the PARP family, is a molecular sensor of DNA breaks, playing a key role in the spatial and temporal organization of break repair through the local synthesis of poly (ADP-ribose) (PAR) at damaged sites, and were expressed at high levels throughout the embryo. Only Parp-1 and Parp-2 have been shown to be activated by DNA strand breaks [6]. PARP-9 [B-aggressive lymphoma-1 (BAL-1), macro PARP] has recently been discovered in patients with certain types of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) and described as a new nuclear protein encoded by the BAL gene, which is expressed in the thymus and specific regions (neuroepithelium) of the brain and gut [7]. PARP-14 is weakly expressed, mainly in the thymus during development and in adulthood, it is essentially co-expressed with PARP-9. During poly (ADP) ribosylation, PARP-1 utilizes NAD + to synthesize poly (ADP)-ribose units either on itself or on a variety of nuclear target proteins such as histones, topoisomerases, DNA polymerases and DNA ligases (Figure 1). This results in highly negative charged nuclear proteins, which in turn leads to the unwinding and repair of the damaged DNA through the base excision repair (BER) pathway. PARP inhibitors offer potential therapies for a wide variety of diseases such as inflammatory conditions, diabetes complications, neurological diseases, stroke and myocardial infarction [8-11]. However, presently, the most prominent clinical role for PARP inhibitors lies within the field of oncology especially the breast cancer susceptibility proteins (BRCA) resistant breast and ovarian cancers. Inhibition of PARP sensitizes tumor cells to cytotoxic drugs that induce DNA damage that would normally be repaired through the BER pathway. PARP-1 inhibitors have consistently demonstrated potentiating effects on the DNA- alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) in preclinical studies, including experimental models of solid tumors such as glioma, melanoma, colorectal, and breast cancer. PARP-1 inhibitors have been demonstrated to sensitize tumors to DNA-alkylating agents (TMZ The majority and cyclophosphamide) of the inhibitors as of well PARP-1 as topoisomerase contain either I poisons free or such cyclic as amide camptothecin in their structures and irinotecan (Figure 2). (CPT-11) Molecular [4,12-15]. insight The PARP-1 between counteracts the PARP-1 camptothecin and the inhibitors action has by been facilitating shown resealing to bind of with DNA the catalytic strand breaks.[14,16] domain of PARP-1 Hence, with PARP-1 “conserved” inhibition and hampers “unconserved” topoisomerase-I interactions. activity Conserved favoring interactions the toxic effects include of two the enzyme lone pair poisons. electrons Indeed, of the preclinical carbonyl oxygen in vivo atom studies of amide have shown forms that two critical the combination hydrogen bonds, of the one PARP-1 with the inhibitor side chain CEP-6800 hydroxyl and of CPT-11 significantly reduces tumor volume of HT-29 colon carcinoma subcutaneous xenografts compared to CPT-11 monotherapy [13]. TMZ is a second-generation DNA-alkylating agent and although TMZ was not effective in a phase II clinical trial against metastatic breast cancer as a monotherapy [17]. It is currently in phase II clinical trial in combination with the PARP-1 inhibitor AG014699 from Pfizer [18,19] and demonstrated promising results in a phase I trial [19]. The majority of the inhibitors of PARP-1 contain either free or cyclic amide in their structures (Figure 2). Molecular insight between the PARP-1 and the inhibitors has been shown to bind with the catalytic domain of PARP-1 with “conserved” and “unconserved” interactions. Conserved interactions include two lone pair electrons of the carbonyl oxygen atom of amide forms two critical hydrogen bonds, one with the side chain hydroxyl of Ser904 and the second with the backbone - NH of Gly863 (Figure 3). The - NH of the amide usually are involved in hydrogen bonding interaction with the backbone carbonyl oxygen atom of Gly863. Electron rich phenol side chain of Tyr907 is found to have critical role in the interactions with phenyl portion of the ligands in face-to-face, π - π interactions as shown in our previous published report [20]. Unconserved interactions include the other interactions present with the inhibitors based on their structures. Thus there is sufficient preclinical and clinical evidence to support the notion that combined inhibition of PARP enzyme in conjunction with DNA-damage will significantly benefit tumor patients. Thus, development of PARP inhibitors could potentially be useful to gain disease control without potentiating side effects and is an interesting research area providing innovative cancer treatment opportunities. There A number is a great of unanswered interest for questions the clinical with development PARP utility of in PARP-1 clinics inhibitors need to be as addressed. a monotherapy For example, against how BRCA-associated are the PARP ovarian activated? or breast What are cancer the mechanisms or in combination for their cardio- therapy and with neuro-protection other SSBs targeting roles observed chemotherapeutic earlier? Does the agents PARP-1 in TNBC. sensitize However, cancer cells a number due to their of limitations effects on inflammatory need to be carefully pathways? addressed, The downstream before this signaling can be of successfully PARP-1 mediated used in cascade the clinics. i.e. range It is important of signaling to realize molecules that recruited PARP by on PARP-1 a continuous is not clear. basis One monitors may also DNA need mutations; to identify clinical therefore conditions PARP inhibition and consider may signaling lead to secondary pathways malignancy involved, in similar addition to to BRCA pathogenetic mutations, and due biochemical to its inability features to repair that sensitizes normal the cellular tumors processes. to PARP In addition, inhibitors. it For is becoming example, clearer PARP-1 that ...

Similar publications

Article
Full-text available
Combination chemotherapy is commonly used to treat late stage cancer; however, the treatment is often limited by systemic toxicity. Optimizing both drug ratio and schedule can improve drug combination activity and reduce dose to lower toxicity. We identified a synergistic drug pair of gemcitabine (GEM) and doxorubicin (DOX) to treat the triple nega...
Article
Full-text available
Abnormal expression of TTK kinase has been associated with the initiation, progression, and therapeutic resistance of breast and other cancers, but its roles remain to be clarified. In this study, we examined the role of TTK in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), and found that higher TTK expression correlated with mesenchymal and proliferative p...
Article
Full-text available
Background: To identify the incidence, recurrence pattern and prognosis of brain metastases (BM) among women with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) treated consecutively at a single institution during a 7-year period. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed mTNBC were retrospectively identified. The incidence of BM as firs...
Article
Full-text available
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an operational term for breast cancers lacking targetable estrogen receptor expression and HER2 amplifications. TNBC is, therefore, inherently heterogeneous, and is associated with worse prognosis, greater rates of metastasis, and earlier onset. TNBC displays mutational and transcriptional diversity, and dist...

Citations

... The PARP inhibitors have also been found to be associated with metabolic disturbances due to PAR accumulation [15]. The major issues hooked to the clinical trials of PARP inhibitors are toxicity profile including myelosuppression, pharmacokinetics and resistance [16]. This has led to the shift in the focus from the PARP inhibitors to PARG inhibitors, which can evade the above mentioned hurdles on the way to discovery of a successful therapeutic target. ...
Article
Full-text available
Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is one of the most pertinent post translational modifications involved in regulation of chromatin structure, cell cycle progression, tissue development and differentiation and other vital biological phenomena. The enzymes that catalyze the synthesis and degradation of poly(ADP) ribose polymers are PARP and PARG, respectively. The role of PARP has been implicated in development of various diseases since a long time and hence it has evolved as an important pharmacological target but a plethora of drawbacks associated with PARP inhibitors compelled the shift of focus towards PARG. Recently PARG has evolved as an alternative target to overcome the hurdles being faced in the treatment of various conditions like multiple organ failure, ischemic organ damage, diabetic nephropathy, neurodegenerative diseases and cancer. The review provides a compendium on PARG, its mode of action, inhibitors, and its therapeutic applications and also discusses the reasons due to which PARG inhibitors have not been able to reach the clinical trials. PARG inhibitors, though far from success, definitely appear as alluring topics for further research as PARG emerges out as an eminent pharmacological target in making which can shape the future of medicines to provide better therapy with reduced side effects and more efficiency.
... As PARP-1 plays a vital role in the repair of DNA strand breaks, including those induced by radiation and chemotherapeutic drugs, inhibitors of this enzyme have potential to improve cancer chemotherapy or radiotherapy (7,8). Drugs that inhibit PARP-1 cause multiple double-strand breaks to form in this way; and in tumors with BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 mutations, these double-strand breaks cannot be efficiently repaired, leading to the death of the cells. ...
Article
Full-text available
Abstract Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) functions as a DNA damage sensor and signaling molecule. It plays a vital role in the repair of DNA strand breaks induced by radiation and chemotherapeutic drugs; inhibitors of this enzyme have the potential to improve cancer chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Three-dimensional quantitative structure activity relationship (3D QSAR) models were developed using comparative molecular field analysis, comparative molecular similarity indices analysis and docking studies. A set of 88 molecules were docked into the active site of six X-ray crystal structures of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1 (PARP-1), by a procedure called multiple receptor conformation docking (MRCD), in order to improve the 3D QSAR models through the analysis of binding conformations. The docked poses were clustered to obtain the best receptor binding conformation. These dock poses from clustering were used for 3D QSAR analysis. Based on MRCD and QSAR information, some key features have been identified that explain the observed variance in the activity. Two receptor-based QSAR models were generated; these models showed good internal and external statistical reliability that is evident from the [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. The identified key features enabled us to design new PARP-1 inhibitors.
Article
Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase1 (PARP1) is a member of 17 membered PARP family having diversified biological functions such as synthetic lethality, DNA repair, apoptosis, necrosis, histone binding etc. It is primarily a chromatin-bound nuclear enzyme that gets activated by DNA damage. It binds to DNA signal- and double-strand breaks, does parylation of target proteins (using NAD⁺ as a substrate) like histones and other DNA repair proteins and modifies them as a part of DNA repair mechanism. Inhibition of PARP1 prevents the DNA repair and leads to cell death. Clinically, PARP1 Inhibitors have shown their potential in treating BRCAm breast and ovarian cancers and trials are going on for the treatment of other solid tumors like pancreatic, prostate, colorectal etc. as a single agent or in combination. There are currently three FDA approved PARP1 inhibitors namely Olaparib, Rucaparib and Niraparib in the market while Veliparib and Talazoparib are in the late stage of clinical development. All these molecules are nonselective PARP1 inhibitors with concurrent inhibition of PARP2 with similar potency. In addition, resistance to marketed PARP1 inhibitors has been reported. Overall, looking at the success rate of PARP1 inhibitors into various solid tumors, there is an urge of a novel and selective PARP1 inhibitors. This review provides an update on various newer heterocyclic PARP1 inhibitors reported in last three years along with their structural design strategies. We classified them into two main chemical classes; NAD analogues and non-NAD analogues and discussed the medicinal chemistry approaches of each class. To understand the structural features required for in-silico designing of next-generation PARP1 inhibitors, we also reported the crucial amino acid interactions of these inhibitors at the target site. Thus, present review provides the insight on recent development on new lead structures as PARP1 inhibitors, their SAR, an overview of in-vitro and in-vivo screening methods, current challenges and opinion on future designing of more selective and safe PARP1 inhibitors.
Article
In this paper, the analytical solution of Fourier and non-Fourier model of heat transfer in longitudinal fin in presence of internal heat generation has been studied under periodic boundary condition. The whole analysis is given in dimensionless form. These two mathematical models have been solved analytically, using Laplace transform technique. Temperature distribution in longitudinal fin is measured using residual theorem in complex plane for the inverse Laplace transform technique. Thermal wave nature is appeared for small value of Fo. The longitudinal fin temperature is evaluated for different value of parameters with respect to space coordinate. The effect of variability of different parameters on temperature distribution in fin is studied in detailed. It has been observed that the cooling process is faster in non-Fourier model in comparison to Fourier model.
Article
The present study deals with the heat transfer enhancement and efficiency of longitudinal rectangular fin profiles when a stretching or shrinking mechanism is mounted on the surface of the fin. Exact analytic solutions are sought from which the combined effects of some physical parameters like the convection sink temperature parameter, the Peclet number, the stretching/shrinking parameter and the convection–conduction parameter (Biot number) on the efficiency of longitudinal rectangular fins against non stretched straight rectangular fins can be comparatively analyzed. It is shown that stretching degrades the efficiency, whereas shrinking provides better fin efficiency pointing to significant advantages in terms of fin design purposes. Moreover, the presented neat formulae serve a verification tool for the researchers actively working in the field, particularly when numerical methods are employed to investigate more complex phenomena.
Article
The application of the Adomian decomposition method (ADM) is extended to study a conductive–convective and radiating moving fin having variable thermal conductivity. Next, through an inverse approach, ADM in conjunction with a binary-coded genetic algorithm (GA) is also applied for estimation of unknown properties in order to satisfy a given temperature distribution. ADM being one of the widely-used numerical methods for solving non-linear equations, the required temperature field has been obtained using a forward method involving ADM. In the forward problem, the temperature field and efficiency are investigated for various parameters such as convection–conduction parameter, radiation–conduction parameter, Peclet number, convection sink temperature, radiation sink temperature, and dimensionless thermal conductivity. Additionally, in the inverse problem, the effect of random measurement errors, iterative variation of parameters, sensitivity coefficients of unknown parameters are investigated. The performance of GA is compared with few other optimization methods as well as with different temperature measurement points. It is found from the present study that the results obtained from ADM are in good agreement with the results of the differential transformation method available in the literature. It is also observed that for satisfactory reconstruction of the temperature field, the measurement error should be within 8% and the temperature field is strongly dependent on the speed than thermal parameters of the moving fin.