Figure - available from: Cogent Psychology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Risk of bias evaluation of the papers extracted from the systematic review procedure. The bar represents the percentage of studies with different degrees of risks of bias: low (green) = randomization and blinding of participants criteria were respected; moderate (yellow) = blinding of participants criterion was respected but randomization data were incomplete; serious (orange) = not respecting the randomization criterion; critical (red) = not respecting any criteria.
Source publication
Cyberball, the paradigm developed by Kipling D. Williams and colleagues (2000) to study ostracism, initially counted three experimental conditions: inclusion, exclusion, and overinclusion. The least known of these conditions is overinclusion, a social interaction characterized by excessive social attention (rather than fairness or no attention). Th...
Similar publications
In clinical psychology and psychiatry, personality is usually assessed using questionnaires developed through factor analysis (FA). Essential domains are identified, which correspond to questions/items defining a (sub)scale, and each question is rigidly assigned to one scale, giving the item the same meaning regardless of how the respondent may int...
