Figure 3 - uploaded by Manda Fischer
Content may be subject to copyright.
Proportion of words incorrect (random error/masker error) by familiarity 369 condition. Random and masker errors are expressed as a proportion of all words 370 presented on incorrect trials (trials on which at least one word was reported incorrectly). 371 Error bars show ±1 standard error of the mean (SE). FT (circles): Familiar-target; FM 372 (squares): Familiar Masker; NN (triangles): Novel-Novel. 373
Source publication
When masked by competing speech, an utterance is more intelligible when it is spoken by someone familiar than a stranger (novel). If this benefit occurs because familiar voices are less cognitively demanding, then a concurrent task should disrupt perception of speech less if the carrier voice is familiar. Participants (N=30) heard two sentences spo...
Contexts in source publication
Context 1
... The data are presented in Figure 3. The analysis confirmed that the main effect 339 of Error Type was significant F(1, 29) = 1143.40, ...
Context 2
... was driven by the fact 352 that participants made the most wrong-voice errors in the familiar masker condition, proportion of random vs. masker errors reliably changed across familiarity conditions, 356 χ 2 (2) = 7.8, p = .02 ( Figure 3). A post hoc comparison of the proportion of errors for the 357 three familiarity conditions was conducted using the Durbin-Conover procedure. ...
