FIGURE 6 - uploaded by Hernando Taborda
Content may be subject to copyright.
Plot of median testing date × proportion of infants choosing Helper/Push-up character in each laboratory. Note: Proportion of infants choosing the Helper/Push-up character (over Hinderer/Push-down character) in each laboratory plotted by the laboratory's median testing date. The dashed line on the y-axis represents chance performance. The smoothing line shows the estimated effects with credible intervals. Data are jittered slightly on the vertical axis to avoid overplotting. Each point represents data from one lab.
Source publication
Evaluating whether someone's behavior is praiseworthy or blameworthy is a fundamental human trait. A seminal study by Hamlin and colleagues in 2007 suggested that the ability to form social evaluations based on third-party interactions emerges within the first year of life: infants preferred a character who helped, over hindered, another who tried...
Context in source publication
Context 1
... infants' choices of the Helper/PushUp Character in the nonsocial condition (43.33%) and the social condition (54.55%) were not different. Figure 6). All the other moderators and interaction effects had CIs that overlapped with zero (for details of the model parameter estimates, see Table 4). ...
Similar publications
Evaluating whether someone's behavior is praiseworthy or blameworthy is a fundamental human trait. A seminal study by Hamlin and colleagues in 2007 suggested that the ability to form social evaluations based on third-party interactions emerges within the first year of life: infants preferred a character who helped, over hindered, another who tried...