Fig 2 - uploaded by Tihomir Eftimov
Content may be subject to copyright.
Photograph of the building of the Military Medical AcademySofia, currently the biggest hospital in the Balkans. The Clinic of Neurosurgery is located on the 10th floor.
Source publication
After 45 years as a closest ally of the Soviet Union in the Warsaw Pact, founded mainly against the US and the Western Europe countries, and 15 years of democratic changes, since 2004 Bulgaria has been a full member of NATO and an equal and trusted partner of its former enemies. The unprecedented transformation has affected all aspects of the Bulga...
Context in source publication
Context 1
... During the period 1993-2004, the head of the neurosurgical clinic was Colonel Associate Professor Alexandar Petkov. In 2004 Petkov retired as a colonel, but up to date has been the head of the Clinic of Neurosurgery and a head of the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery at the Division of Military Surgery, Military Medical Academy-Sofia (Fig. ...
Citations
... Bulgaria has university neurosurgical clinics in Sofia, Varna, Plovdiv, Stara Zagora and Pleven and military neurosurgical center in Sofia (11,12). They represent reference centers for their regions. ...
... This not only increases the deployment rate for those few neurosurgeons available but also presents a disincentive for neurosurgeons to join the armed forces. These facts have been recognised by medical services of other NATO nations as well [3, 8]. As a consequence, the French military medical service provide neurosurgical expertise by mobile aircraft based units of complete operating room teams, able to perform neurosurgical care with some delay [1]. ...
Since July 2007, neurosurgical services have been continuously available in a multinational Role 3 field hospital in Mazar-e-Sharif (MeS), Afghanistan. In this paper, we analyse a 3-year neurosurgical caseload experience.
We retrospectively analysed the neurosurgical caseload at a Role 3 medical treatment facility in northern Afghanistan between October 2007 and October 2010. The cases were divided into acute, urgent and elective procedures and into cranial, spinal, peripheral nerve and miscellaneous surgeries.
A total of 190 surgeries were performed. Of these, 50 operations (26.3%) were acute procedures that were conducted to save lives or preserve neurological function. In addition, operations included 47 urgent (24.7%) and 93 elective (49%) procedures. There were 58 cranial surgeries (30.5%), 113 spinal surgeries (59.5%), 11 peripheral nerve surgeries (5.8%), and 8 miscellaneous surgeries (4.2%). Surgical treatment was provided to 13 International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) soldiers (6.8%), 22 members of the Afghan National Security Forces (11.6%), and 155 Afghan civilians (81.6%).
The primary mission of the field hospital is to provide sick, injured or wounded ISAF personnel with medical and surgical care, the outcome of which must correspond to standards prevailing in Germany. Only a very small number of neurosurgical operations performed in MeS met the criteria established by this mission statement and by the modern principles of damage-control wartime surgery. This is completely different from the experience reported by other ISAF nations in eastern and southern Afghanistan.
Introduction
Cervical laminectomy is a reliable tool for posterior decompression in various cervical spine pathologies. Although there is increasing evidence of superior clinical, neurological and radiological outcomes when using anterior cervical decompression, laminectomy can be a valuable tool when combined with instrumented lateral mass fusion for carefully selected indications.
Methods
Literature review.
Results
This review article will provide decision-making guidance, technical advices and pitfalls. The technical advice for laminectomy and instrumented lateral mass fusion is illustrated. The authors review the literature on outcomes and complications and suggest indications for the safe and successful application of cervical laminectomy and lateral mass fusion.
Objective:
To provide a basis for the choice of anterior surgery procedures in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) through long-term follow-up.
Methods:
A consecutive series of 89 patients with CSM having complete follow-up data were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) from July 2000 to June 2007. The lesions were located in one segment (n = 25), two segments (n = 56), and three segments (n = 8). Preoperative and postoperative, the C2-C7 angle, cervical intervertebral height, radiographic fusion status, result of the adjacent segment degeneration, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), and the Short Form 36-item (SF36) questionnaire scores were used to evaluate the efficacy of the surgery.
Results:
According to the different compression conditions of the 89 cases, different anterior operation procedures were chosen and satisfactory results were achieved, indicating that direct anterior decompressions were thorough and effective. The follow-up period was 60-108 months, and the average was 79.6 months. The 5-year average symptom improvement rate, effectiveness rate, and fineness rate were 78.36 %, 100 % (89/89), and 86.52 % (77/89), respectively.
Conclusions:
For CSM with compression coming from the front side, proper anterior decompression based on the specific conditions could directly eliminate the compression. Through long-term follow-up, the effect of decompression became observable.
Background:
Expandable cervical cages have been utilised successfully to reconstruct the cervical spine for various conditions. However, to date there are only limited data on their influence on cervical sagittal profile. In this retrospective study, we present our experience with performing anterior cervical corpectomy in one or two levels using expandable titanium cages in order to achieve stable reconstruction and restoration of cervical lordosis.
Methods:
A case series of data from 48 consecutive patients (20 men, 28 women; mean age 61 years) operated upon in a 5-year-period is retrospectively reviewed. Standard anterior single- or two-level cervical corpectomy, fusion and spinal reconstruction were performed, including placement of an expandable titanium cage and an anterior cervical plate. The mean follow-up was 23 months (range, 8-42 months). Outcome was measured by clinical examinations and visual analogue scale (VAS) scale; myelopathy was classified according the Nurick grading system. Radiographic analysis comprised several parameters, including segmental Cobb angle, cervical lordosis, subsidence ratio and sagittal cage angle. Computed tomography was done 1 and 2 years after surgery; cervical spine radiographs were obtained 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery.
Results:
In 38 patients (79 %) osseous fusion or stability of construct could be demonstrated in the 2-year follow up examination. The mean restoration of segmental Cobb angle as well as cervical lordosis amounted to 7.6° and 5.4° respectively, both being statistically significant. Furthermore, a profound correction (10° or more) of the sagittal cervical curve was shown in 15 patients.
Conclusion:
Regarding the restoration of the physiological sagittal cervical profile, expandable cervical cages seem to be efficient and easy to use for cervical spine reconstruction after anterior corpectomy. Donor-site-related complications are avoided, fast and strong reconstruction of the anterior column is provided, resulting in satisfactory fusion rates after 2 years.
There is considerable controversy as to which technique is best option for reconstruction after multilevel anterior decompression for cervical spondylosis. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results and complications of anterior cervical discectomy fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy fusion (ACCF) in the treatment of multi-level cervical spondylosis.
We reviewed and analyzed papers published from Jan 1969 to Dec 2010 regarding the comparison of ACDF and ACCF for multilevel cervical spondylosis. Statistical comparisons were made when appropriate.
Twelve studies were included in this systematic review. Blood loss was greater for ACCF compared with ACDF. Similarly, the rate of graft dislodgement in ACCF was higher than that in ACDF. Nonunion rates were 18.4% for 2-level ACDF and 37.3% for 3-level ACDF, whereas nonfusion rates were 5.1% for single-level ACCF and 15.2% for 2-level ACCF. In addition, nonunion rates for three disc levels fused were much higher than that for two disc levels fused, regardless of discectomy or corpectomy. Clinical outcome was compared between ACDF and ACCF in nine studies. Of these, similar outcome was found between ACDF and ACCF in six studies, whereas three studies reported better outcome in ACCF compared with ACDF.
Nonunion rates of ACDF are higher than those of ACCF for multilevel cervical spondylosis. Sometimes, clinical outcome of ACCF was better than ACDF for multilevel cervical spondylosis.