Figure 5 - uploaded by Faezeh Khorram
Content may be subject to copyright.
Contexts in source publication
Context 1
... mentioned above and also illustrated in Figure 4 (label 1), any existing test execution engine that runs test cases on models and produces the model execution traces along with the test execution results can potentially be integrated into our test coverage framework. Both to clarify these requirements and to provide the structure of the elements manipulated or constructed by the approach (e.g., coverage matrices) we provide a precise definition of the key concepts using an Ecore metamodel shown in Figure 5. ...
Context 2
... the end, we generate a complete element coverage matrix for the model's test suite by merging those produced for each of its test cases. The matrix can be persisted as a XMI file, conforming to the metamodel presented in Figure 5 (as presented later, Section 6). ...
Context 3
... the project explorer on the left, there are two projects, one containing the Arduino model (shown in Figure 2) and another containing a test suite written for it using our testing framework [9]. The constructed coverage matrices can be persisted as XMI files conforming to the format presented in Figure 5 upon the request of the user-the user can select the related options in the run configuration. For example, Label 1 in Figure 9 indicates the generated coverage files. ...
Similar publications
Background:
Language impairments, which affect both structural aspects of language and pragmatic use, are frequently observed in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). These impairments are often associated with atypical brain development and unusual network interaction patterns. However, a neurological framework remains elusive to explain them.
Methods:...
