Figure - available from: Data
This content is subject to copyright.
Guideline tables from Michetti et al. [15] for evaluation of (a) epicentral intensity: ranges of surface faulting parameters (primary effects) and typical extents of total area of secondary effects for each intensity degree; (b) local intensity: diagnostic criteria for assigning intensity degrees based on environmental effect classes. (c) Chart illustrating main features and size parameters of macroseismic ESI scale for different intensity degrees, from Silva et al., [17].
Source publication
![Guideline tables from Michetti et al. [15] for evaluation of (a)...](publication/390009897/figure/fig2/AS:11431281329410028@1743170820507/Guideline-tables-from-Michetti-et-al-15-for-evaluation-of-a-epicentral-intensity_Q320.jpg)
The 1688 Sannio–Matese earthquake, with a macroseismically derived magnitude of Mw = 7 and an epicentral intensity of IMCS = XI, had a deep impact on Southern Italy, causing thousands of casualties, extensive damage and significant environmental effects (EEEs) in the epicentral area. Despite a comprehensive knowledge of its economic and social impa...
Similar publications
The Q-value may be used for classification of the rock mass around an underground opening, as well as for field mapping. This means that the Q-value may be influenced by the blasting on the underground opening. The Q-value in an undisturbed rock mass may be different.
The Q-system is a classification system for rock masses with respect to stability...
