Figure 2 - uploaded by Tormod Ravnanger Landet
Content may be subject to copyright.
Source publication
In free-surface flows, such as breaking ocean waves, the momentum field will have a discontinuity at the interface between the two immiscible fluids, air and water, but still be smooth in most of the domain. Using a higher-order numerical method is more efficient than increasing the number of low-order computational cells in areas where the solutio...
Contexts in source publication
Context 1
... Peri´cPeri´c and Abdel-Maksoud (2018) for estimates of the minimum forcing zone size and the penalty magnitude needed to obtain a given reduction in reflected wave amplitudes. Figure 2 shows the forcing zones used in the test case described in section 7.2. The inlet zone is 0.75 m long and the outlet zone is 1.0 m long. ...
Context 2
... κ fz is the penalty parameter, in our calculations 10, β fz is the zone shape shown in figure 2 and u D (x, z, t) is the incident-wave velocity field used for initial and boundary conditions. The same forcing-zone approach is added to the density-transport equation for the colour function with the same forcing-zone shapes and the same penalty parameter, κ fz = 10. ...
Context 3
... Peri´cPeri´c and Abdel-Maksoud (2018) for estimates of the minimum forcing zone size and the penalty magnitude needed to obtain a given reduction in reflected wave amplitudes. Figure 2 shows the forcing zones used in the test case described in section 7.2. The inlet zone is 0.75 m long and the outlet zone is 1.0 m long. ...
Context 4
... κ fz is the penalty parameter, in our calculations 10, β fz is the zone shape shown in figure 2 and u D (x, z, t) is the incident-wave velocity field used for initial and boundary conditions. The same forcing-zone approach is added to the density-transport equation for the colour function with the same forcing-zone shapes and the same penalty parameter, κ fz = 10. ...