Fig 6 - uploaded by Tomas Földes
Content may be subject to copyright.
Estimated marginal means of frontal asymmetry index (y scale) and frontal alpha power (x scale) at 11-deg dazzling angle and 25% target contrast for the three different ballistic goggles at the three measurement moments for all participants. Error bars stand for 95% confidence intervals. Symbols shown in the legend represent the measurement moments, and the colors stand for the different goggles.
Source publication
Our study examines how laser dazzling affects human performance, specifically accuracy and reaction times, using a laser dazzling shooting simulator at the Royal Military Academy, Belgium. The research assesses the performance degradation under laser dazzling in a simple, baseline scene, including different target contrasts and the use of laser eye...
Context in source publication
Context 1
... agree with the literature in which more demanding tasks are associated with more a negative frontal asymmetry index and higher frontal alpha power. Figure 6 illustrates the estimated marginal means at the 11-deg dazzling angle and 25% target contrast, focusing on the three different ballistic goggles across the three measurement Estimated marginal means of frontal asymmetry index (y scale) and frontal alpha power (x scale) at 11-deg dazzling angle and 25% target contrast for the three different ballistic goggles at the three measurement moments for all participants. Error bars stand for 95% confidence intervals. ...
