Figure 2 - uploaded by Mathea Loen
Content may be subject to copyright.
Estimated effects of responsibility on level of intervention for each country. Note: The figure displays the effect of responsibility (X1-X3) on recommended level of intervention by country, estimated through OLS regression (N = 6031).
Source publication
This article examines the role individuals’ basic values about responsibility, uncertainty and child rights, have on willingness to accept state intervention in a family in a potential child protection situation. A key area within social sciences is how and when it is justified for governments to restrict individual freedom, for example allow autho...
Context in source publication
Context 1
... < .001). The estimate between countries shows that the positive correlation appears in all countries, however the strength of the effect is weaker in England, Finland and Norway (see Figure 2). Descriptive analyses 5 for 'Absolutely-sure' and 'Best-CR' (see Figure 3(a) and (b)), shows that 43% favour false positive -44% favours false negative, and 60% are supportive of their child protection system being best at protecting child rights, even when this overrides parental rights. ...
