Figure 3 - available via license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Content may be subject to copyright.
ERPs locked to the T1-response at posterior (A) and frontocentral (B) 216 electrodes. Difference waves are computed from the respective T1 error minus T1 correct raw 217 ERPs. Scalp topographies represent these difference waves. Gray areas indicate the time 218
Source publication
The concurrent execution of temporally overlapping tasks leads to considerable interference between the subtasks. This also impairs control processes associated with the detection of performance errors. In the present study, we investigated how the human brain adapts to this interference between task representations in such multitasking scenarios....
Contexts in source publication
Context 1
... initially analyzed T1-response-locked ERPs to find out about immediate neural 188 correlates of error processing after T1 errors. A distinct parietal positivity, the Pe, was clearly 189 observable for both SOA conditions (Fig 3A). For an analysis of the Pe, we subjected mean 190 amplitudes at electrode POz to a repeated measures ANOVA on the variables SOA (short vs. 191 long) and T1 Correctness (correct vs. error). ...
Context 2
... that the Pe reduction in trials with short 205 SOA is not a mere consequence of the amplitude difference in correct trials. 206 Figure 3B shows that also a clear frontocentral Ne/ERN was observable in both SOA 207 conditions. Indeed, subjecting mean amplitudes at electrode FCz to a repeated measures 208 ANOVA of the same variables as above revealed that a significant Ne/ERN across both SOAs 209 ...
Similar publications
The concurrent execution of temporally overlapping tasks leads to considerable interference between the subtasks. This also impairs control processes associated with the detection of performance errors. In the present study, we investigated how the human brain adapts to this interference between task representations in such multitasking scenarios....
