Figure 1 - uploaded by Emmanuel Ferragne
Content may be subject to copyright.

Contexts in source publication

Context 1
... analyses revealed that the effect of Condition in this time window was limited to sentences with DID (p<.001). A similar ANOVA was conducted on the mean amplitude in the 300-500 ms window and an effect of the Condition × Auxiliary interaction (F(1,28)=25.68, p<.001) was found. Post-hoc analyses revealed that with DID, the amplitude was greater in the Incorrect than in the Correct condition (p<.001) but that with HAD, the amplitude was more negative in the Incorrect than in the Correct Condition (p<.001). ...
Context 2
... analyses revealed that the effect of Condition in this time window was limited to sentences with DID (p<.001). A similar ANOVA was conducted on the mean amplitude in the 300-500 ms window and an effect of the Condition × Auxiliary interaction (F(1,28)=25.68, p<.001) was found. Post-hoc analyses revealed that with DID, the amplitude was greater in the Incorrect than in the Correct condition (p<.001) but that with HAD, the amplitude was more negative in the Incorrect than in the Correct Condition (p<.001). ...