Degree Distribution of a Single Spot Retweet Spread Graph with 308 Nodes

Degree Distribution of a Single Spot Retweet Spread Graph with 308 Nodes

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
The ubiquity of social media has transformed communication patterns and interactions in contemporary society, allowing individuals to share experiences, thoughts, and opinions on a global scale. However, this unprecedented connectivity has also facilitated the dissemination of hate speech, posing novel challenges for platforms, policymakers, and re...

Context in source publication

Context 1
... to the graph, there are 296 graphs with over or equal to 308 nodes with 247 strongly connected components, and 21 graphs with the largest strongly connected component of 9, while other 229 graphs with node numbers smaller than 9 and a maximum strongly connected component of either size of 1 or 2. It shows that around 54% of the hateful users have the ability to spread a message to over half of the hateful users because of the connection to the largest strongly connected component in the graph, while the other proportion of the hateful users has a small ability to spread messages by retweeting and 40% of hateful users are even isolated as disconnected hateful user. Figure 4 shows the degree distribution of the hate graph of all retweets between hateful users, and Figure 5 illustrates the degree distribution of a random single-spot hate spread graph. These two graphs of degree distributions indicate that the hate-spread retweet graph follows the Power Law. ...

Similar publications

Preprint
Full-text available
Social media user profiling through content analysis is crucial for tasks like misinformation detection, engagement prediction, hate speech monitoring, and user behavior modeling. However, existing profiling techniques, including tweet summarization, attribute-based profiling, and latent representation learning, face significant limitations: they o...
Article
Full-text available
In an age of social media, online forums, and chats, cyberbullying is a prevalent issue. On Twitter (now X), approximately 500 million tweets are shared per day (Antonakaki et.al., 2021). It is the job of the moderators to ensure these tweets follow standard community guidelines. However, the sheer number of tweets makes it difficult to sort manual...
Preprint
Full-text available
Hate speech has grown into a pervasive phenomenon, intensifying during times of crisis, elections, and social unrest. Multiple approaches have been developed to detect hate speech using artificial intelligence, but a generalized model is yet unaccomplished. The challenge for hate speech detection as text classification is the cost of obtaining high...
Article
Full-text available
Social media sites facilitate users’ discussions, expression of opinions, sharing of information and news, and promotion of ideas and products, thus rapidly increasing the volume of hate speech and offensive content on online platforms. Consequently, hate speech and offensive content have turned out to be a widespread issue that negatively affects...
Article
Full-text available
Hate speech constitutes a major problem on microblogging platforms, with automatic detection being a growing research area. Most existing works focus on analyzing the content of social media posts. Our study shifts focus to predicting which users are likely to become targets of hate speech. This paper proposes a novel Hate-speech Target Prediction...