Figure 4 - uploaded by Peter B Moyle
Content may be subject to copyright.
Components of the Okavango ecosystem. (a) Hippo trail through flooded vegetation in seasonal swamp; (b) termite mound; (c) elephants in newly flooded seasonal swamp; and (d) experimental gill net catch of fish, showing the diversity of species. Photographs: Peter B. Moyle.
Source publication
Kalahari Desert of southern Africa, is an immense allu-vial fan created by the rivers that drain the highlands of An-gola (Mendelsohn and el Obeid 2004). It is perhaps most famous for its dense populations of African megafauna, from elephants to lions to crocodiles. However, it is also one of the largest intact wetlands in the world, which is refle...
Context in source publication
Context 1
... a complex plant community dominated by sedges and grasses becomes dominant, similar to the plant community that emerges downstream as the channels become smaller (Ellery and McCarthy 1994, Ellery et al. 2003). From the panhandle region, the water moves through a reach of anas- tomosing channels, fed by a central, meandering, 26-km channel (Smith et al. 1997). Most of the side channels and lagoons in this area come and go in a dynamic equilibrium between sediment deposition and the action of large animals, especially hippos (figures 3, 4). The channels are lined with giant grasses ( Phragmites mauritanus and Miscanthus junceus ) or similar plants, with dominance determined by complex interactions of flow, soils, nutrients, and fire (Ellery et al. 2003). Generally, the walls lining the channels are not as dense with stems as are the papyrus stands of the panhandle. The river next bifurcates into three channels—the Thaoge, Jao, and the Nqoga—just below Seronga, and the waters spread into a vast area of seasonal swamp (figure 1). The Thaoge is currently inactive (Porter and Muzila 1989), so the Jao and Nqoga remain the main source of water for much of the delta, which is distributed through a series of large, semipermanent branch channels. These drainage channels are perennial where they begin, but at their lower ends, they are typically dry for much of the year. The main channels are con- nected to lagoons by smaller channels. The lagoons are large, open expanses of water of complex origin that contain dense growths of macrophytes (McCarthy et al. 1993). During wet periods, the more distal small drainage channels deliver water (and fish) to pools that otherwise depend on rain- water to be filled. These pools are important sources of water for wildlife. The geomorphology and ecology of ecosystems are tied to- gether under a framework of complexity through what Stallins (2006) terms “ecological memory.”A key concept for understanding the way floodwaters influence the delta’s ecosystem is to think of each region as having a memory of the extent and size of past floods. The memory is longest in the seasonal swamp, where extensive flooding in one year may fill clay- bottomed pools and river channels with enough water to keep them watered through one or more drier years, and where swamp vegetation will persist for decades even if the flood regime changes (Gumbricht and McCarthy 2003). In the panhandle, the memory is shorter because most of the region floods annually, but the extent of flooding influences the size of off-channel lagoons and the strength of their connections to the main river channel. Overall, the memory of wet years can sustain species and populations through dry years, while the memory of dry years can reduce the ecosystem effects of wet years, although potentially it can have positive effects on nutrient cycling (see the next section). Overall, the alterna- tion of wet and dry years in an irregular pattern very likely maximizes ecosystem productivity and diversity. The biophysical processes that occur in the delta also occur in other systems around the world, but the isolated desert location of the Okavango, combined with the strong biotic interactions described here, make it unique. The most similar systems are also in Africa. The Bangweulu Swamps (Zambia) is a system in which seasonal flooding creates dynamic habitats and dispersal pathways for fish (Kolding et al. 2003). This seasonal flood pulse, in a lagoon and river channel complex, is also present in the Central Barotse (Zambia) floodplain (Kelly 1968). Likewise, the Shire floodplain (Malawi) is driven by a flood pulse, which maintains an oxbow lake, lagoon, and island complex (Chimatiro 2004). Similar observations of the effect of the flood pulse on fish dynamics have been made in the Solimoes floodplains of the Amazon (Cox Fernandes and de Mérona 1988, Chernoff et al. 2004, Siqueira-Souza and Freitas 2004). The importance of the annual flooding regime to fish and other aquatic organisms is enhanced by a number of large- scale biological processes that link the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Three that have been identified as particularly important are (1) the role of large animals, (2) the role of termites, and (3) the biotic mobilization of nutrients. The role of large animals. The conspicuous mammals, birds, and reptiles that attract so many tourists to the Okavango region are important players in determining the physical and biological structure of the delta’s ecosystem, as ecosystem engineers (as defined by Wright and Jones 2006). For physical structure, hippo, elephant, and perhaps Nile crocodile ( Crocodylus niloticus ) are most important because of their size and abundance. Hippos are particularly important because their amphibious life style requires extensive daily movements between water and land (McCarthy et al. 1998a). These movements create incised, vegetation-free pathways through which water can flow during flooding (figure 4). These channels may become major river channels when the old channels fill with sand and avulse. In the panhandle and permanent swamp areas, hippos regularly break through the dense papyrus and reeds that form the stream banks, diverting water and sediment into adjacent areas. Because they favor deep lagoons for resting during the day, the hippo-created channels usually lead to lagoons. When these channels are re- captured by the main river, the lagoons fill with sediment (McCarthy et al. 1998a). These ever-changing channels and lagoons created by the actions of hippos are major habitats for fish. Elephants, with an expanding population of about 35,000 individuals in the delta (Mendelsohn and el Obeid 2004, Ramberg et al. 2006), also create channels, both by walking through flooded vegetation and through creation of de- pressed pathways during the dry season, which then serve as conduits for floodwater. Elephants also have major impacts on trees through their feeding activity; they kill and mangle the plants and disperse seeds through their dung. Extensive removal of trees by elephants on the largest island of the delta, Chiefs Island, and elsewhere may result in major rises in the salinity of the channels, through changes in water moved through transpiration. This observation is based on findings from McCarthy and Ellery (1994), who observed that large plants on islands act as “transpirational pumps” by removing water and leaving salts in the groundwater of islands. Subsequently, these islands act as salt sinks and hence assist in keeping the delta’s water less saline. Removing large trees from islands can stop this process, resulting in greater salinity of seasonal floodplain waters, with potential catastrophic effects on swamp vegetation and fish (Mendelsohn and el Obeid 2004). Elephants, hippos, buffalo, and other mammalian herbivores have exceptionally high densities in the Okavango Delta (Ramberg et al. 2006). They not only affect the structure and composition of delta vegetation, but presumably play a major role in converting vegetation biomass into forms that readily fertilize floodwaters, promoting fish production. The full importance of mammalian herbivores as a nutrient source for the aquatic ecosystem, compared with other sources (e.g., decaying vegetation), still needs to be determined (Hoberg et al. 2002). However, there is evidence that small and relatively shallow lagoons in the delta, which are most likely to be heav- ily fertilized by animal dung, sustain high fish production (Fox 1976). The role of piscivorous birds, mammals (e.g., two ot- ter species), reptiles (e.g., Nile crocodile, water monitor), and fishes in recycling nutrients in the system is also not well understood, but, given their abundance and diversity, it is bound to be considerable. The Nile crocodile in particular is often noted as a keystone predator and scavenger in African systems; its role in the Okavango is poorly understood, although fish (mainly catfishes and cichlids) and macroinvertebrates are major food items (Blomberg 1976). The impact of large herbivores, especially hippos, is some- what similar in other African floodplain systems. The activities of hippos and elephants in combination create many of the large pools in floodplain rivers, which provide refuges for fish during the dry season (Naiman and Rogers 1997). These pools and lagoons are subsequently fertilized by hippo dung, which promotes primary production, while the action of hippos in stirring the water prevents formation of anoxic conditions (Kilham 1982, Gereta and Wolanski 1998, Wolanski and Gereta 1999). The role of termites. Much of the upland topography of the delta is the result of the actions of a termite, Macrotermes michaelseni (Dangerfield et al. 1998). During dry periods, or when water shifts away from an area, termites colonize areas with suitable clay soils and vegetation and build subterranean nests, each topped by a large mound full of passages. The function of the mound is to ventilate the nest, into which vegetation is carried to support the gardens of fungi that the termites eat. The mounds can be up to 4 m high and cover 50 m 2 . When a termite colony is killed by inundation, the mound erodes, creating a small island, which then becomes a favorable site for recolonization by termites (Dangerfield et al. 1998). As this process repeats, the island grows in size. Because of the combination of elevation above low floods and nutrient-enriched soils, termite islands become colonized by trees and other plants (figures 3, 4). The islands then become favored places for living and feeding by mammals and birds, resulting in positive feedback loops that fertilize the soils and bring in seeds from other areas, contributing to successional processes (McCarthy et al. 1998b). With regard to fish, the 150,000 termite- derived islands not only determine the location of channels but also provide a source of complex cover and habitat ...
Similar publications
Earth's most imperiled and iconic wildlife are facing tough decisions under increasing human pressure and limited resources. Swimming across rivers and water bodies filled with high densities of predators may be one such example. In African lions Panthera leo, previous water crossings (recorded in the peer‐reviewed and gray literature, on film, and...
This study examined Human-Wildlife Conflicts (HWC) in Andoni and Opobo/ Nkoro Local Government Areas of River State, Nigeria. Data for the study were collected through structured questionnaire, personal observation and in-depth interview with respondents from selected communities. A set of questionnaires was randomly administered to household heads...
Resource specific competition between predators has typically been studied from their interactions at meso-herbivore carcasses, because such carcasses are abundant. Mega-carcasses like those of elephants are rare but unparalleled in the extent of carrion biomass they offer and the long durations they can persist. These rare resource bonanzas can th...
Conflicts between the interests of agriculture and wildlife conservation are a major threat to biodiversity and human well‐being globally. Addressing such conflicts requires a thorough understanding of the impacts associated with living alongside protected wildlife. Despite this, most studies reporting on human–wildlife impacts and the strategies u...
Citations
... Effects on physical processes can in turn result in increased habitat heterogeneity and interact with biological processes, sometimes driving cascading changes in an ecosystem (Byers, 2024). For example, elephant (Loxodonta spp.) trails can be created during the dry season and then serve as conduits for floodwaters in the rainy season, modifying local and regional hydrology (Mosepele et al., 2009). ...
... To illustrate the extent of research for each of allogenic and autogenic engineers, for each engineer type we choose three examples that differ in their habitat types (e.g., in terms of terrestrial vs. aquatic from freshwater to estuarine to marine, or tropical to temperate) and types of engineering functions. References (Keppers et al. 2008); 15 (Ebrahimi et al. 2012); 16 (Nadeau et al. 2015); 17 (Fromant and Bost 2020); 18 (Wilson 1986); 19 (Bourgeois et al. 2015); 20 (Smith et al. 2005); 21 (Grillet et al. 2010); 22 (Souter et al. 2004); 23 (Mosepele et al. 2009); 24 (Kerley and Landman 2006); 25 (Valeix et al. 2011);26 (Pringle 2008 (Storlazzi et al. 2004); 49 (Storlazzi et al. 2009); 50 (Davis et al. 2011);51 (Wild et al. 2004); 52 (Brooks et al. 2007); 53 (Coker et al. 2014); 54 (Rädecker et al. 2015); 55 (Komyakova et al. 2019); 56 (Perkol-Finkel et al. 2006); 57 (Walsh 1985); 58 (Ambrose 1994); 59 ; 60 (Charbonnel et al. 2002); 61 (Dewsbury and Fourqurean 2010); 62 (Ambrose and Anderson 1990); 63 (Falcão et al. 2009); 64 (Andskog et al. 2023); 65 (Ng et al. 2017); 66 (Fabi et al. 2002); 67 (Baynes and M. Szmant 1989); 68 (Kim et al. 2020); 69 ); 70 ); 71 (Peterson et al. 2004); 72 (Chen et al. 2007); 73 (Christianen et al. 2013); 74 (Hovel et al. 2002); 75 (Bowden et al. 2001); 76 (Bell et al. 1988); 77 (Bos et al. 2007); 78 (van Katwijk et al. 2010); 79 (Prasad et al. 2019); 80 (Healey and Hovel 2004); 81 (Bologna and Heck 2000); 82 (Upston and Booth 2003); 83 (Ambo-Rappe and Rani 2018); 84 (Villanueva et al. 2023); 85 (Carus et al. 2022); 86 (Layman et al. 2016); 87 (Virnstein and Curran 1986); 88 (Nakamura et al. 2007); 89 (Bartholomew 2002); 90 (Shahbudin et al. 2011);91 Marin-Diaz et al. (2021); 92 (John et al. 2016); 93 (Griffitt et al. 1999); 94 (Roncolato et al. 2024); 95 (Grabowski and Peterson 2007); 96 (Reidenbach et al. 2013); 97 (Pfirrmann and Seitz 2019); 98 ; 99 (Lenihan 1999); 100 (Walles et al. 2016); 101 (Goelz et al. 2020); 102 (Hogan and Reidenbach 2022); 103 (Soniat et al. 2004); 104 (Furlong 2012); 105 (Cannon et al. 2022); 106 (Smith et al. 2023); 107 ); 108 (Hammond et al. 2020); 109 (Pierson and Eggleston 2014); 110 (Wellman et al. 2022(Wellman et al. ). et al., 2008; how costs and benefits of artificial mimicry, reintroduction, and other approaches compare (Iftekhar et al., 2016); and which values and objectives are emphasized by stakeholders (Titus et al., 2024;Wainaina et al., 2023). ...
... Leaf tying caterpillars Leaves tied together to facilitate shelter for arthropods Lill & Marquis, 2003;Lill et al., 2007Lill & Marquis, 2003 Mussels Filtration by mussel mats Arribas et al., 2014;Borthagaray & Carranza, 2007Crooks & Khim, 1999 Elephants Refuge habitat created through tree damage during foraging Fritz, 2017;Haynes, 2012;Mosepele et al., 2009;Pringle, 2008Pringle, 2008 Arrow grass Rhizome rings that result in areas of raised mud Fogel et al., 2004Fogel et al., 2004 Alligators Form wallows that facilitate habitat heterogeneity in wetlands Campbell & Mazzotti, 2004Campbell & Mazzotti, 2004 Parsnip webworm Chew small holes in the stems of hogweed to pupate in Harvey et al., 2016Bethe et al., 2022 Earthworms Create burrows by displacing soil Babu Ojha & Devkota, 2014Savin et al., 2004 Similarly, consideration of transecosystem interactions or effects that cross ecosystem boundaries could be relevant depending on which processes mimicked structures affect. Many researchers argue for the consideration of transecosystem effects between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems in project planning (Baruch et al., 2021;Knight et al., 2005). ...
In an age of anthropogenically driven species loss and increasingly novel ecosystems, ecosystem engineer restoration is a process‐based approach to supporting ecosystem function. Many ecosystem engineers have low or declining population sizes. When feasibility and costs impede reintroduction of ecosystem engineers, an alternative may be artificial mimicry of ecosystem engineer structures. Research on mimicry of autogenetic ecosystem engineers, whose physical structure shapes habitat availability and complexity (e.g., tropical corals whose hard skeletons create complex reefs that provide habitat), spans many process scales. However, mimicry of allogenic ecosystem engineers, which shape habitat availability through their behavior (e.g., beavers building dams that influence hydrology), is less well explored. We reviewed the literature to examine the efficacy of artificial mimicry of allogenic ecosystem engineers and gaps in the research. Emerging findings suggest that artificial mimicry could restore physical processes, support focal species, alter biological communities, deliver benefits to landowners and ecosystems, and promote population recovery. However, some studies document the potential for unintended negative consequences for ecosystem engineers or species that use engineered structures or respond to environmental cues produced by engineered structures. Topics requiring additional research include assessing the efficacy of artificial structures as compared with natural structures, evaluating the scalability and cost‐effectiveness of mimicry projects, and investigating the potential for unintended consequences with mimicked structures.
... Occasionally, they drown while crossing the river, becoming a significant source of nutrients essential for the river's productivity (Subalusky et al., 2017(Subalusky et al., , 2018(Subalusky et al., , 2021. Elephants and other large wildlife are also important sources of organic matter and nutrients in streams and rivers through egestion and excretion (Mosepele et al., 2009;Hulot et al., 2019;Iteba et al., 2021). As ecosystem engineers, the combined activities of hippos and elephants create many large pools in floodplain rivers, which provide refuge for fish during the dry season (Naiman and Rogers, 1997). ...
... Heritage Site, the delta supports a unique and diverse range of flora and fauna, including numerous bird species, fishes, and large mammals (Mosepele et al., 2009;UNESCO, 2024). The Congo River supports one of the world's most diverse communities of freshwater fishes, and many people rely on the river for its fisheries (Lowe-McConell, 1987;Harrison et al., 2016). ...
This book offers the first comprehensive pan–African assessment of the characteristics, status, and management of African streams and rivers. Until now, there has been missing an authoritative reference book on the structure and functioning of these water systems, the challenges they face, and the management options available. Most existing literature has focused on lentic water systems, such as lakes, ponds, reservoirs, and wetlands. This book addresses this gap by collating existing information on the current understanding of the African riverine ecosystem into a single volume. Aware of Africa's unique challenges and opportunities, particularly the need for sustainable livelihoods and clean water to achieve Sustainable Development Goals, this book provides an in-depth understanding of different management options and policies within the African context. It is a reliable resource for educators and practitioners, offering insights into the dynamics of streams and rivers, and strategies for conserving and managing these fragile ecosystems to meet legislative and governance targets. Intended as an educational and practical guide, this book addresses biodiversity, conservation, scientific, and management issues related to African river systems. It is written in accessible language, making it understandable for laypersons, and includes numerous case studies. Covering regions from South to North and East to West, including Central Africa, the book examines how river basins are managed and protected against various threats, highlighting their biota and ecological processes. The book is logically organised to emphasize the interdependence of river science, conservation, and management. It integrates multiple perspectives on rivers, illustrating the interrelationships between various professions involved in river issues. Extensive cross–referencing within chapters helps readers connect related topics, underscoring the important ecological, conservation, and management aspects crucial to understanding and preserving African streams and rivers.
... Hence, overall species diversity is often influenced by the level of habitat heterogeneity (Pacini et al., 2009;Tews et al., 2004). In terms of freshwater environments, geomorphic complexity through fluctuating water levels creates disturbance through processes such as erosion, deposition, and flood events, which contributes to habitat heterogeneity (Wohl, 2016), while habitat modification caused by bioengineers such as elephants and hippopotamuses similarly contribute to habitat heterogeneity and hence species diversity (Mosepele et al., 2009). Such disturbance from fluctuating water levels not only creates habitat heterogeneity, but also exposes prey for consumption by birds, herpetofauna, and mammals that would otherwise be less accessible in stable water conditions. ...
... Hippopotamus trails through wetlands also improve water circulation and increase oxygen levels, creating new habitats for fish and invertebrates. In the Okavango Delta (Northern Botswana), hippos play a crucial role in geomorphological changes (Mosepele et al., 2009). Their movement through the wetland prevents channels from closing due to encroaching vegetation, and their pathways to backswamps can facilitate the development of new drainage routes during channel avulsion (McCarthy et al., 1998). ...
In this chapter, we discuss major drivers and impacts of land-water connections in Afrotropical streams and rivers in the
context of three primary regions of the watershed in which these connections are likely to occur—forested headwaters, sa‐
vannah grasslands, and wetland ecosystems. First, we discuss the role of forested headwaters. We provide an overview of
processes that occur in these regions of the watershed. We then discuss Africa's water towers generally and provide a de‐
tailed overview of Kenya's water towers. We conclude with a case study of the Mau Forest water tower in Kenya. Second,
we discuss savannah grasslands, which are a key feature of the middle reaches of many Afrotropical rivers. We discuss
the three primary drivers that shape many savannah grasslands—fire, large wildlife, and livestock grazing—and how they
impact land-water connections, as well as the impact of climate change on these drivers. We then provide a case study
from the Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem in which we review how these drivers interact with one another. Third, we discuss
wetland ecosystems, in which we provide an overview of land-water interactions shaping wetland ecosystems and discuss
key wetland ecosystems in Africa, including floodplain and coastal wetlands. We provide a case study of the Mara Wet‐
land, Kenya-Tanzania, as well as an overview of wetland ecosystems in Uganda. We then discuss drivers of wetland
degradation, as well as opportunities for conservation and restoration.
... The wallowing of hippos also creates many pools and lagoons in rivers and floodplains, which provide refuge for fish during the dry season (Naiman and Rogers, 1997). The pools and lagoons are subsequently fertilized by hippo dung, which promotes primary and secondary production (Hoberg et al., 2002;Mosepele et al., 2009). Organic matter and nutrient inputs into streams and rivers contribute directly and indirectly to food webs and other ecosystem processes (Fig. 20.6). ...
Knowledge of the trophic structure and the major energy sources supporting metazoan production are important considerations for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem management. African streams and rivers face multiple stressors from agricultural intensification, deforestation, and municipal and industrial effluents coupled with uncontrolled water abstractions. Yet, the effects of these influences on ecosystem structure and functioning are poorly understood. In this chapter, we review the trophic dynamics of African riverine ecosystems with a focus on trophic structure, the major sources of energy supporting food webs, and the influence of human activities. While much of the data used for this review are from African studies, we also reference other studies in the tropics for comparison and to fill existing knowledge gaps. Based on available information, autochthony, short food chains, and an increased tendency toward omnivory characterize food webs in African streams and rivers. However, trophic interactions and dynamics in these systems are witnessing changes caused by human activities. Changes in trophic diversity and dynamics include shifts from allochthony to autochthony following the deforestation of forested headwater streams, top-down control of local fish and invertebrate populations caused by introduced predatory fish such as trout, and shrinkage of trophic niche sizes caused by land use change. Despite these developments, studies on food web structure and trophic dynamics are very limited in low-order streams, and we have identified future research needs that need to be addressed to fill knowledge gaps that would hinder biodiversity conservation and effective management of riverine ecosystems in African rivers, including their fisheries.
... Hippos are essential to the stability and health of ecosystems because of the numerous ecological functions they perform, especially in aquatic environments (Voysey et al., 2023). For example, they influence aquatic biogeochemistry and food webs by transporting substantial amounts of nutrients and organic matter from grazing lands into aquatic ecosystems, thereby promoting diversity (McCauley et al., 2015;Mosepele et al., 2009;Shurin et al., 2020). Further, the depressions created in the environment by their wallowing behavior can serve as habitats for many species (McCarthy et al., 1998;Mosepele et al., 2009;Voysey et al., 2023). ...
... For example, they influence aquatic biogeochemistry and food webs by transporting substantial amounts of nutrients and organic matter from grazing lands into aquatic ecosystems, thereby promoting diversity (McCauley et al., 2015;Mosepele et al., 2009;Shurin et al., 2020). Further, the depressions created in the environment by their wallowing behavior can serve as habitats for many species (McCarthy et al., 1998;Mosepele et al., 2009;Voysey et al., 2023). Structurally heterogeneous vegetation created by their grazing activities around water bodies can attract and support a diverse assemblage of herbivores (Kanga et al., 2013). ...
Background and Aim: The native range of the African hippo has contracted significantly due to various anthropogenic threats such as poaching and habitat destruction, thus making the species highly prone to extinction. Protected areas can safeguard hippo populations through legal restrictions and other effective strategies. However, knowledge, perceived threats, and benefits of the species can influence local people’s attitudes towards their conservation. Yet, gaps in our understanding of what people know about hippos and their conservation persist, especially in Ghana, where their population is vulnerable, thus requiring urgent research. Methods: To improve this knowledge deficit, we employed a mixed-methods research approach to collect data from household heads in five communities in the Bui National Park (BNP) landscape for descriptive and regression-based statistical analyses. Results: Our findings revealed that respondent’s knowledge of hippos was significantly influenced by education and exposure to the species. Several respondents reported relatively stable or declining population patterns for hippos and attributed the causes to poaching and the construction of the hydropower dam in the BNP. Most respondents wanted hippo populations to increase in the future due to the potential benefits they could derive through tourism while the remaining respondents wanted their numbers to decline due to perceived conflict situations such as boat capsizing and crop damage. Conclusion: Local people’s knowledge of the hippo and its conservation is influenced by education and exposure to the species, and its population is perceived to be declining due to human activities. Implications for Conservation: Authentic and meaningful engagements among diverse stakeholders (e.g., farmers, fishermen, and park authorities) in the BNP landscape are critical to ensuring hippo conservation based on our findings. In particular, community-wide education to enhance hippo literacy, avoidance of farming along riverbank habitats, and adoption of sustainable livelihood approaches may benefit the aquatic environment, hippos, and local people.
... In the shallow water current area, flooded water deposits their allochthonous nutrients and makes it fertile for primary productivity (Adamczuk et al., 2019). The water connectivity in the flooded area may create a migratory path for most diadromous fishes (Mosepele et al., 2009). In our study, most of the small fishes were found in lowland areas due to stagnant water, availability of natural food, shelter, and ease in breeding. ...
... In flood years, it overflows the lake basin and mixes water and fauna eventually with the Amur River of Russia, and later flows into the North Pacific Ocean (Kim et al. 2017 ). The annual floods of the Okavango River make the Okavango Delta in Botswana an area rich in wildlife and an important refuge for biodiversity in a desert environment (Ramberg et al. 2006, Mosepele et al. 2009 ). Seasonal floods in the Amazon basin and the Pantanal (Paraguay River basin) are strongly associated with maintaining artisanal and subsistence fishing, ensuring that adult fish have access to food resources in the flooded forest ( igapós ) and that fish larvae and alevins have shelter and food in the recently inundated floodplain (Castello et al. 2019, Rauber et al. 2021 ). ...
Societal perceptions of river floods are typically negative because of the death and destruction they may cause, although scientists and natural resource managers have long recognized the critical ecological role of floods. Like fire and some other ecological disturbances, river flooding intersects many aspects of ecology and society. But unlike fire, flooding receives relatively little attention in the disturbance ecology literature. We call for more focused recognition of flood ecology as a discipline to help river science better inform societal perceptions through developing a better understanding of the ecological roles of flooding. We contend that the absence of a discipline of flood ecology has constrained progress in our understanding of how rivers function and that a formal conceptualization could help reveal the positive aspects of flooding. Finally, we propose a series of questions that we believe a discipline of flood ecology should address.
... It is also notable that the Okavango Delta is located within Botswana. This is a vast, inland aquatic area of outstanding importance for biodiversity [11,12], and represents the world's largest inland wetland [13]. The monitoring of CECs in this region should be a key part of conservation activities. ...
... • 29 deposition from wastes [Mosepele et al. 2009, Holdredge et al. 2010), nutrient cycling (Andriuzzi et al. 2016), seed dispersal (Wilby et al. 2001, Mosepele et al. 2009) or oxygenation of water or sediment (Kilham 1982, Bertness 1985, Gereta and Wolanski 1998, Wolanski et al. 1999, Daleo and Iribarne 2009. Alternatively or concurrently, they may consume the habitat-forming species or otherwise negatively affect its size or geometry (Whicker and Detling 1988, Wilby et al. 2001, Daleo and Iribarne 2009, Holdredge et al. 2009, Mosepele et al. 2009, Gass and Binkley 2011. ...
... • 29 deposition from wastes [Mosepele et al. 2009, Holdredge et al. 2010), nutrient cycling (Andriuzzi et al. 2016), seed dispersal (Wilby et al. 2001, Mosepele et al. 2009) or oxygenation of water or sediment (Kilham 1982, Bertness 1985, Gereta and Wolanski 1998, Wolanski et al. 1999, Daleo and Iribarne 2009. Alternatively or concurrently, they may consume the habitat-forming species or otherwise negatively affect its size or geometry (Whicker and Detling 1988, Wilby et al. 2001, Daleo and Iribarne 2009, Holdredge et al. 2009, Mosepele et al. 2009, Gass and Binkley 2011. ...
... • 29 deposition from wastes [Mosepele et al. 2009, Holdredge et al. 2010), nutrient cycling (Andriuzzi et al. 2016), seed dispersal (Wilby et al. 2001, Mosepele et al. 2009) or oxygenation of water or sediment (Kilham 1982, Bertness 1985, Gereta and Wolanski 1998, Wolanski et al. 1999, Daleo and Iribarne 2009. Alternatively or concurrently, they may consume the habitat-forming species or otherwise negatively affect its size or geometry (Whicker and Detling 1988, Wilby et al. 2001, Daleo and Iribarne 2009, Holdredge et al. 2009, Mosepele et al. 2009, Gass and Binkley 2011. In either case, these effects may be in addition to indirect effects by engineers also altering the food web to the detriment or benefit of habitat-forming species through consumption of herbivores or organisms that modify soil conditions (ants, Zelikova et al. 2011;kangaroo rats, Prugh and Brashares 2012;crabs, Bertness and Coverdale 2013). ...