Fig 2 - Experimental examination of the possibilities of geophysical methods in wooded and rugged terrain: case study of the defunct medieval glasswork Vysoká Jedle in the Ore Mountains

Fig. 2: Comparison of the results of different applied geophysical methods. a) detail of fluxgate magnetometer measurement, b) resistivity, c) EM-conductivity (Q-phase), d) EM-magnetic susceptibility (I-phase), e) magnetic susceptibility from Multi Kappa and coil 1 m dimeter, f) magnetic susceptibility from Multi Kappa and coil 0.5 m diameter. tometer prospection, black line -detail for complex measurements.

Comparison of the results of different applied geophysical methods. a) detail of fluxgate magnetometer measurement, b) resistivity, c) EM-conductivity (Q-phase), d) EM-magnetic susceptibility (I-phase), e) magnetic susceptibility from Multi Kappa and coil 1 m dimeter, f) magnetic susceptibility from Multi Kappa and coil 0.5 m diameter. tometer prospection, black line -detail for complex measurements.

Go to figure page

Reference

Experimental examination of the possibilities of geophysical methods in wooded and rugged terrain: case study of the defunct medieval glasswork Vysoká Jedle in the Ore Mountains - Scientific Figure on ResearchGate. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Comparison-of-the-results-of-different-applied-geophysical-methods-a-detail-of-fluxgate_fig2_369163267 [accessed 18 Apr 2025]

Caption

Fig. 2: Comparison of the results of different applied geophysical methods. a) detail of fluxgate magnetometer measurement, b) resistivity, c) EM-conductivity (Q-phase), d) EM-magnetic susceptibility (I-phase), e) magnetic susceptibility from Multi Kappa and coil 1 m dimeter, f) magnetic susceptibility from Multi Kappa and coil 0.5 m diameter. tometer prospection, black line -detail for complex measurements.

Embed code

<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Comparison-of-the-results-of-different-applied-geophysical-methods-a-detail-of-fluxgate_fig2_369163267"><img src="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369163267/figure/fig2/AS:11431281239680350@1714481881063/Comparison-of-the-results-of-different-applied-geophysical-methods-a-detail-of-fluxgate.ppm" alt="Comparison of the results of different applied geophysical methods. a) detail of fluxgate magnetometer measurement, b) resistivity, c) EM-conductivity (Q-phase), d) EM-magnetic susceptibility (I-phase), e) magnetic susceptibility from Multi Kappa and coil 1 m dimeter, f) magnetic susceptibility from Multi Kappa and coil 0.5 m diameter. tometer prospection, black line -detail for complex measurements."/></a>