Fig 3 - uploaded by Lukas Velebil
Content may be subject to copyright.
Comparison of experimental results with analytical model outputs at the end of the compression zone of anchorage (left), at the end of the tensile zone of anchorage (middle) and at the top of the wall (right).
Contexts in source publication
Context 1
... test data of wall panels were averaged for a clearer graphical comparison of the results. The comparison of the displacement curves is shown in Fig. 3. The largest absolute difference in horizontal displacements at the top of the panel is 12.5 mm (relative error of 18%). The absolute difference of the maximum resistances is 1.1 kN (relative error of 3.5%). By comparing the experimental data with the outputs of method for surfaces from mutually flexible jointed layers (DIN 1052(DIN ...
Context 2
... test data of wall panels were averaged for a clearer graphical comparison of the results. The comparison of the displacement curves is shown in Fig. 3. The largest absolute difference in horizontal displacements at the top of the panel is 12.5 mm (relative error of 18%). The absolute difference of the maximum resistances is 1.1 kN (relative error of 3.5%). By comparing the experimental data with the outputs of method for surfaces from mutually flexible jointed layers (DIN 1052(DIN ...
Similar publications
Overview of the joint profiling technologies of 5mC and 5hmC.
p>Joint Detection and Decoding over Multipath Channels: the Known Path</p
