Comparison between converted pressure and measured pressure of drilling fluid

Comparison between converted pressure and measured pressure of drilling fluid

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
Poor reservoir physical property which leads to low rate of water injection pressure decline after the shut-in because of drilling control is the main characteristic of Daqing peripheral oilfields. To reduce reservoir energy loss, ensure the effect of infilling well, it is necessary to study the formation pressure of infill well point. However, the...

Similar publications

Article
Full-text available
Background: Risankizumab is approved for treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Availability of a patient-controlled single self-injection of risankizumab may improve adherence and long-term management of psoriasis. Objective: To investigate efficacy, safety, and usability of a new risankizumab 150 mg/mL formulation administered as a...
Article
Full-text available
Numerical simulation of continuously rotating detonations of stoichiometric two-fuel mixture with air has been carried out for the cylindrical annular detonation chamber (DC) of the rocket-type engine. The syngas (1-α)СO+αH2, a binary mixture of hydrogen H 2 and carbon monoxide CO, is taken. We studied the global flow structure in DC, and the detai...
Chapter
Full-text available
From recent work in two areas of discrete applied geometry, we abstract a common pattern of families of geometric homologies for graphs realized in projective d-space (for static rigidity) or in the projective plane (for bivari-ate splines). Using distinct algebraic constructions for the local coefficients of the chain complexes (exterior algebra f...
Article
Full-text available
Injection of Newtonian fluids to displace pseudoplastic and dilatant fluids, governed by the power-law viscosity relationship, is common in many industrial processes. In these applications, changing the viscosity of the displaced fluid through velocity alteration can regulate interfacial in-stabilities, displacement efficiency, the thickness of the...

Citations

... The testing production of a single well was 7.1 × 10 4 to 29.1 × 10 4 m 3 /d, and the production varies greatly . Since the Mesozoic and Cenozoic, the Sichuan Basin has experienced multiple periods of tectonic movement, resulting in a complex distribution of the magnitude and direction of the in-situ stresses in the Longmaxi Formation Ma et al., 2020;Wang, 2020;Luan et al., 2022). The Nanchuan Area is located at the edge of the Sichuan Basin and is a high-pressure-normal-pressure transition zone for shale gas. ...
Article
Full-text available
The in-situ stress and formation pressure are important parameters in shale gas development. They directly affect the well wall stability, the direction of horizontal well drilling, and the fracturing effect during the shale gas development process. There are abundant shale gas resources in the southeastern Chongqing-Sichuan area, but the structure in the area is complex, and it is difficult to predict the in-situ stress and formation pressure. Therefore, in this paper, a finite element simulation model was established based on a large number of seismic, logging, and experimental rock mechanics data and the prediction accuracy of the stress field simulation was effectively improved. The construction of the stress field was based on the combined spring model, as well as the data related to the measured in-situ stress and the formation pressure obtained during drilling. The coupling relationship between the in-situ stress, the formation strain, and the formation pressure were derived to carry out the prediction of the distributions of the formation pressure and the formation pressure coefficient. The prediction results showed that the present-day maximum principal stress direction in the study area was about NE65°–110°, and the present-day maximum principal stress was 56.12–93.79 MPa. The present-day minimum principal stress direction was about NE335°–20°, and the present-day minimum principal stress was 48.06–71.67 MPa. The formation pressure was 2.8–88.25 MPa, and the formation pressure coefficient was 0.74–1.55. The formation pressure distribution was greatly affected by fault, tectonic location, in-situ stress and rock petrophysical properties, and the overpressure areas of the formation were distributed in the synclines and the deeply buried areas. This study shows that the finite element based formation pressure prediction method is effective.