Figure 1 - available via license: CC BY-NC
Content may be subject to copyright.
Collaborative Housing Construction in Kampong in 1950s (Left) and Anjungs as Social Place in Malay House (Right) Source: Tang, Kampong Days: Village Life and Times in Singapore Revisited (Singapore: National Archives, 1993), 21-22.

Collaborative Housing Construction in Kampong in 1950s (Left) and Anjungs as Social Place in Malay House (Right) Source: Tang, Kampong Days: Village Life and Times in Singapore Revisited (Singapore: National Archives, 1993), 21-22.

Source publication
Article
Full-text available
In response to alienation of human-earth relationship and weakened community bonding resulted from rapid urban development since 1960s, a series of participatory design projects have been launched by the Singapore government in cooperation with related grass-roots organizations and researchers, promoting distinctive working model and space prototyp...

Contexts in source publication

Context 1
... in terms of operation methods, gotong royong (mutual aid in Malay) is the basic way to create and maintain living environment, which helped to develop a volunteer culture. For example, villagers' relatives and their neighbors engaged in building houses (Figure 1) and managing security work collaboratively. ...
Context 2
... in terms of space, porotype of participatory planning and common space could be viewed in Kampong: residents' own houses usually face to others with windows open on all sides, so as to ensure security and to improve ventilation; Anjungs (front porch in Malay, Figure 1) and courtyard were kept as semi-public space for communication. ...
Context 3
... It notes were given to each participant to write down their concerns and questions and to discuss solutions during cross group sharing (Figure 10), so as to get the design brief by brainstorming and voting. ...
Context 4
... Drawing and Collage Games evoked residents' awareness of community's current situation and possible activities and facilities in the future life. Each group was required to come out with a sketch of their design by collaging photos, drawings and descriptions on the A3 site picture (Figure 10), which provided significant foundation for subsequent steps. ...
Context 5
... Buffet provided the familiar setting of buffet meal to invite community stakeholders to design without prior training. 17 Design ingredients ( Figure 11) such as cut-out furniture catalogue, 3D base model in 1:30 and additional materials were prepared in a tray as -food‖ for participants to collect and carry out design by making models (Figure 12). ...
Context 6
... Buffet provided the familiar setting of buffet meal to invite community stakeholders to design without prior training. 17 Design ingredients ( Figure 11) such as cut-out furniture catalogue, 3D base model in 1:30 and additional materials were prepared in a tray as -food‖ for participants to collect and carry out design by making models (Figure 12). ...
Context 7
... design model in Singapore not only contributes to stimulating new space types, but also ensures that the design results meet the residents' needs. Firstly, two design typologies ( Figure 13) are developed, practiced and concluded through a series of projects: one is Neighbourhood Incubator, a one-stop community hub to promote community activities and ground-up initiatives; the other is Social Linkway, which introduces communal functions and facilities to the transitory linkways to encourage residents to linger for social communication. Secondly, neighbourhood relationship has been strengthened not only during the design process but also in the daily use of the newly created spaces. ...
Context 8
... instance, in the past two years, several community gardens have been set up near Social Linkways by informal leaders who participated in -Hello Neighbour!‖ (Figure 14). ...
Context 9
... on the perspectives of history and strategies, the historical continuity of public participation in shaping living environment is indicated: from selforganized operation, mutual-aided lifestyle and semi-public space, to multiple organizational support, participatory development process and community-based urban space. From this point, a community planning model based on interaction within system, environment and behavior could be concluded which targets at design process rather than physical environment (Figure 15). This model involves multiple fields such as urban planning, architecture design, economy and management, which requires involvement of professionals from different area as well as new department engaging in internal logic in interdisciplinary manner. ...
Context 10
... the way to establish a communication mechanism to break the barriers of various disciplines is still the shortcoming of current research. In addition, as the assessment from participants is gathered throughout the whole process and affects design results significantly, this trend could possibly develop the evaluation process from assessment model to optimization model (Figure 15), achieving self-development and self-renewal of the design process. ...

Similar publications

Article
Full-text available
For architects as well as developers and urban planners working on the floor plans or estimating the shape and dimensions of large buildings is always a challenge. This task requires some knowledge and what is more important – even with understanding of the process it is a very time-consuming task. One should take into consideration the arrangement...

Citations

... By engaging various community members, the design thinking approach leads to more targeted and effective solutions. In public housing projects, this methodology has enabled residents to participate from the early stages of urban planning to the renewal of community spaces (Ruiqi, 2019). Similarly, in upcycling initiatives, stakeholder consultations help identify barriers and opportunities, leading to the development of innovative solutions like mobile app-aided platforms for waste management (Shan, Neo, & Yang, 2021). ...
Conference Paper
This paper develops a framework to analyze which policy areas and jurisdictions are more likely to adopt Design Thinking for policy development. Design Thinking has been increasingly applied across various domains to tailor products and services to the actual needs of users, primarily by focusing on understanding the problems from the perspective of the end-users. In public policy, especially public services, Design Thinking has shown success through stakeholder consultations, prototype testing, and focus groups. However, its application reaches limits as the diversity of the population increases or if the policy area is highly specialized. Even in jurisdictions like Singapore, known for its extensive use of Design Thinking in public service design, limitations are noticeable. In larger countries like India, local governance is often more suitable for Design Thinking due to its proximity to the community's specific needs, whereas areas requiring standardized services such as taxation and currency are less apt for this approach. Additionally, the paper discusses the adoption of international best practices, viewing the acceptance of a policy by other nations as a form of indirect user feedback, which aligns with the core principles of Design Thinking. The paper also explores the transferability of successful policies across different jurisdictions, emphasizing the importance of understanding the original context to effectively adapt policies to new environments. It concludes by contrasting principles-based policy ideologies, like libertarianism, with more participatory approaches, hypothesizing that jurisdictions with a participatory ethos are more likely to engage end-users in policy development.
... En sí mismo, un proyecto de cohousing supone una forma de vida alternativa que responde a las actuales necesidades y deseos de muchas personas (De Jorge-Huertas, 2020), respondiendo simultáneamente a necesidades individuales y comunitarias alejadas de las soluciones estandarizadas (Avilla-Royo et al., 2021). Estas necesidades y demandas, expresadas en el colectivo, son la base de las decisiones de diseño (Adianto et al., 2021;Brysch y Czischke, 2022;De Jorge-Huertas, 2020;Hadlos, 2021;Ruiqi, 2019;Valladares, 2013), tanto las presentes como las futuras, lo que lleva a los grupos a considerar la creación de espacios o elementos flexibles (Avilla-Royo et al., 2021;Brysch y Czischke, 2022;De Jorge-Huertas, 2020; García Pérez y Moya González, 2018;Hammond, 2018;Valladares, 2014). Este enfoque basado en las necesidades reales Hábitat y Sociedad (ISSN 2173-125X), n.º 16, noviembre de 2023, Universidad de Sevilla, pp. ...
... Los procesos descritos suelen basarse en secuencias de talleres temáticos con varias sesiones cada uno, sobre necesidades y demandas de participantes, respecto a características e implantación del edificio, seguidos de la presentación de planos por parte del equipo técnico (Bukovszki et al., 2021;Devlin et al., 2015;Etxezarreta et al., 2018;Fernández Arrigoitia y Scanlon, 2015;Martins et al., 2021;Mota, 2019;Ruiqi, 2019;Sukkasame, 2019) aunque también se puede orientar a los grupos a talleres de carácter más holístico (Hammond, 2018;Socas-Wiese et al., 2021) o formativo (Heslop, 2021;Hilmer, 2020). El caso cubano es diferente porque se utiliza la entrevista como inicio y base del trabajo, combinada con juegos (Valladares, 2013(Valladares, , 2017(Valladares, , 2014. ...
... Los estudios sobre codificación y descodificación de las decisiones de diseño siguen siendo escasos, por lo que se desconocen los sistemas de comunicación entre profesionales y usuarios (Mota, 2019) y no se ha analizado suficientemente el impacto que genera en los resultados abrir el proceso de diseño a los ciudadanos (Detienne et al., 2019), no sólo en cuanto al resultado arquitectónico sino a la relación entre la satisfacción residencial con la participación (Hadlos, 2021). Se requiere profundizar en mecanismos de comunicación que rompan las barreras entre las diversas disciplinas que intervienen en los procesos de diseño de vivienda (Ruiqi, 2019) y que permitan construir referentes transdiciplinarios que incluyan las narrativas sobre la vida cotidiana en familia y comunidad (Vázquez Cruz, 2022). Si bien es cierto que se defienden ampliamente los enfoques participativos en proyectos de vivienda, se requiere una mirada crítica a estos enfoques, así como profundizar detalladamente en los indicadores de éxito o fracaso (Valladares, 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
Introducción: El objetivo es describir y analizar la primera etapa del proceso de diseño participativo aplicado en un proyecto de viviendas colaborativas o cohousing, basado en el método Livingston. La cooperativa El Ciempiés decidió iniciar un proceso participativo de diseño para su edificio en marzo del 2020, al inicio del confinamiento por COVID-19 en España, lo que precisó reconsiderar las técnicas y herramientas del proyecto. Método: Estudio de caso basado en el análisis de documentos, memorias y grupos focales. Resultados: Se describe y analiza el proceso de diseño participativo de la cooperativa El Ciempiés. Discusión: El orden lógico y las técnicas del método Livingston se adaptaron al contexto complejo y cambiante del proyecto, respondiendo a las demandas manifiestas y latentes del colectivo. Conclusiones: Los procesos de diseño participativo se adecúan a las expectativas y necesidades de las personas participantes en proyectos de viviendas colaborativas. El método Livingston proporciona las bases para generar una estrategia de transformación espacial en procesos autogestionados de viviendas colaborativas y permite adaptar sus herramientas a contextos complejos como el trabajo con colectivos en una situación de pandemia. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introduction: The purpose of this paper is to describe and analyse the first phase of the participatory design process applied to a collaborative housing project, based on the Livingston method. “El Ciempiés” cooperative decided to start a participatory process for designing its building in March 2020, coinciding with the beginning of the COVID-19 lockdown in Spain, requiring reconsideration of the techniques and tools used for the development of the project. Method: Case study based on the analysis of documents, reports and focus groups. Results: Description and analysis of the phases of the participatory design process of “El Ciempiés” cooperative. Discussion: The logical order and techniques of the Livingston method supported the process, adapting its tools to the complex and changing context of the project. The central elements of the method responded to the expressed and latent demands of the collective. Conclusions: The processes of participatory design are appropriate to the expectations and needs of the participants involved in collaborative housing projects. The Livingston method provides the bases to generate a spatial transformation strategy in self-managed processes of collaborative housing and allows it to adapt its tools to complex contexts such as working with collectives in a pandemic situation.
... En sí mismo, un proyecto de cohousing supone una forma de vida alternativa que responde a las actuales necesidades y deseos de muchas personas (De Jorge-Huertas, 2020), respondiendo simultáneamente a necesidades individuales y comunitarias alejadas de las soluciones estandarizadas (Avilla-Royo et al., 2021). Estas necesidades y demandas, expresadas en el colectivo, son la base de las decisiones de diseño (Adianto et al., 2021;Brysch y Czischke, 2022;De Jorge-Huertas, 2020;Hadlos, 2021;Ruiqi, 2019;Valladares, 2013), tanto las presentes como las futuras, lo que lleva a los grupos a considerar la creación de espacios o elementos flexibles (Avilla-Royo et al., 2021;Brysch y Czischke, 2022;De Jorge-Huertas, 2020; García Pérez y Moya González, 2018;Hammond, 2018;Valladares, 2014). Este enfoque basado en las necesidades reales Hábitat y Sociedad (ISSN 2173-125X), n.º 16, noviembre de 2023, Universidad de Sevilla, pp. ...
... Los procesos descritos suelen basarse en secuencias de talleres temáticos con varias sesiones cada uno, sobre necesidades y demandas de participantes, respecto a características e implantación del edificio, seguidos de la presentación de planos por parte del equipo técnico (Bukovszki et al., 2021;Devlin et al., 2015;Etxezarreta et al., 2018;Fernández Arrigoitia y Scanlon, 2015;Martins et al., 2021;Mota, 2019;Ruiqi, 2019;Sukkasame, 2019) aunque también se puede orientar a los grupos a talleres de carácter más holístico (Hammond, 2018;Socas-Wiese et al., 2021) o formativo (Heslop, 2021;Hilmer, 2020). El caso cubano es diferente porque se utiliza la entrevista como inicio y base del trabajo, combinada con juegos (Valladares, 2013(Valladares, , 2017(Valladares, , 2014. ...
... Los estudios sobre codificación y descodificación de las decisiones de diseño siguen siendo escasos, por lo que se desconocen los sistemas de comunicación entre profesionales y usuarios (Mota, 2019) y no se ha analizado suficientemente el impacto que genera en los resultados abrir el proceso de diseño a los ciudadanos (Detienne et al., 2019), no sólo en cuanto al resultado arquitectónico sino a la relación entre la satisfacción residencial con la participación (Hadlos, 2021). Se requiere profundizar en mecanismos de comunicación que rompan las barreras entre las diversas disciplinas que intervienen en los procesos de diseño de vivienda (Ruiqi, 2019) y que permitan construir referentes transdiciplinarios que incluyan las narrativas sobre la vida cotidiana en familia y comunidad (Vázquez Cruz, 2022). Si bien es cierto que se defienden ampliamente los enfoques participativos en proyectos de vivienda, se requiere una mirada crítica a estos enfoques, así como profundizar detalladamente en los indicadores de éxito o fracaso (Valladares, 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: The purpose of this paper is to describe and analyse the first phase of the participatory design process applied to a collaborative housing project, based on the Livingston method. “El Ciempiés” cooperative decided to start a participatory process for designing its building in March 2020, coinciding with the beginning of the COVID-19 lockdown in Spain, requiring reconsideration of the techniques and tools used for the development of the project. Method: Case study based on the analysis of documents, reports and focus groups. Results: Description and analysis of the phases of the participatory design process of “El Ciempiés” cooperative. Discussion: The logical order and techniques of the Livingston method supported the process, adapting its tools to the complex and changing context of the project. The central elements of the method responded to the expressed and latent demands of the collective. Conclusions: The processes of participatory design are appropriate to the expectations and needs of the participants involved in collaborative housing projects. The Livingston method provides the bases to generate a spatial transformation strategy in self-managed processes of collaborative housing and allows it to adapt its tools to complex contexts such as working with collectives in a pandemic situation.