Figure 2 - available via license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Content may be subject to copyright.
Behavioral results of Experiment 1. RTs to Task 1 and Task 2 are depicted 174 in the left and middle panel, respectively. Error rates are presented in the right panel. Error 175 bars indicate within-subject standard errors of the mean (Cousineau, 2005; Morey, 2008). RT 176 = response time. SOA = stimulus onset asynchrony. T1 = Task 1. T2 = Task 2. 177 178
Source publication
The concurrent execution of temporally overlapping tasks leads to considerable interference between the subtasks. This also impairs control processes associated with the detection of performance errors. In the present study, we investigated how the human brain adapts to this interference between task representations in such multitasking scenarios....
Context in source publication
Context 1
... Behavior. RTs and error rates are depicted in Figure 2. To verify that our paradigm 137 creates a dual-tasking scenario with overlapping task execution, we first examined whether 138 two typical effects of dual-tasking can be observed in this dataset: First, the so-called PRP 139 effect refers to the observation that RTs to T2 increase with a decreasing stimulus onset 140 asynchrony (SOA), and thus indicates a form of dual-task cost. ...
Similar publications
The concurrent execution of temporally overlapping tasks leads to considerable interference between the subtasks. This also impairs control processes associated with the detection of performance errors. In the present study, we investigated how the human brain adapts to this interference between task representations in such multitasking scenarios....
