Table 5 - uploaded by Harnpon Phungrassami
Content may be subject to copyright.
Source publication
This study was proposed to estimate the carbon footprint (CF) and analyze the environmental hotspot of pineapple cultivation and canned pineapple production, and offer opportunities to reduce its CF. The studied cultivation area covered 158 ha, divided into small, medium-sized, and large farms. Input data including organic fertilizer, synthetic fer...
Context in source publication
Similar publications
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a major constituent of greenhouse gases responsible for climate change. Since industrial age, the concentration of CO2 in the earth atmosphere has been increased considerably. The sources of CO2 in the atmosphere are both natural and manmade. However, electricity through various sources is one of the major contributors to CO...
Climate change and economic inequality are inextricably linked. Despite widespread agreement among researchers and policymakers that a carbon tax is the most efficient mechanism to curb greenhouse gas emissions, such a tax exacerbates inequality since low-income households spend a greater share of their income on carbon-intensive goods. Using Input...
Electric vehicles (EVs) are considered to be a solution for sustainable transportation. EVs can reduce fossil fuel consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and the negative impacts of climate change and global warming, as well as help improve air quality. However, EV adoption in Thailand is quite low. Against this backdrop, this study investigates ba...
The challenge of global warming and climate change is evident. The heavy reliance of countries on fossil fuels for power generation is the leading cause of this problem. To mitigate the e ects of carbon dioxide emissions, a greenhouse gas (GHG), various methods for determining carbon dioxide emissions have been met with insu cient or incomplete dat...
Global warming is caused mainly by CO2 emission from burning fossil fuels and is beginning to have large negative impacts on human well-being and ecosystems (IPCC 2014; IPCC 2018). Policies that mitigate CO2 emissions will require public support. Here, we examine how support for several possible decarbonization policies varies as a function of the...
Citations
... This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge on the environmental impacts of canned pineapple production. The review focuses on studies published in peer-reviewed journals between 2000 and 2022 and assesses the greenhouse gas emissions, acidification, and eutrophication potential associated with the production of canned pineapple (Usubharatana & Phungrassami, 2017). ...
A systematic literature review was conducted to assess the current state of knowledge on the environmental impacts of canned pineapple production. The review included studies published in peer-reviewed journals between 2000 and 2022, and focused on the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions, acidification, and eutrophication potential associated with the production of canned pineapple. The results of the review suggest that canned pineapple production has significant environmental impacts, particularly in terms of greenhouse gas emissions, which are mainly associated with energy use and transportation. However, the review also identified several strategies that can be implemented to reduce the environmental impacts of canned pineapple production, such as using renewable energy sources and optimizing transportation routes. The review concludes that further research is needed to fully understand the environmental impacts of canned pineapple production and to develop effective strategies for reducing these impacts.
... Life cycle assessment (LCA), an environmental management tool, is generally employed in identifying and quantifying material and energy usage and associated environmental impacts throughout a product's life cycle. Examples of LCA studies on the agricultural sector in Thailand are: an assessment of environmental impacts of Thai jasmine rice focusing on climate change, water use and biodiversity impacts (Mungkung et al., 2019), an evaluation of carbon footprint of pineapple production in central Thailand (Usubharatana and Phungrassami, 2017), and a study of LCA of pineapple production in northern Thailand (Oonkasem et al., 2019). An improved approach to assessing agricultural sustainability that incorporates environmental and economic performance, known as eco-efficiency (EE), has been introduced. ...
Considering the growing commitment of countries to sustainable agriculture, an integrated approach that considers environmental and economic performance or eco-efficiency (EE) was applied to compare two different farming systems of two pineapple cultivars, Nanglae and Phulae, produced in the northern region of Thailand. Environmental performance was assessed based on a life cycle approach. Thus, the total environmental load expressed as a single score was quantified and used as an environmental indicator of EE. Results showed that the integrated farming system of pineapple production was more sustainable than the conventional farming practice. The results of EE were then incorporated into a sustainable farm model to identify an optimal farm plan that corresponds to an objective function under available resources and constraints. In the model, income risk in terms of the variability of selling price was considered as a key factor in farmers' decision making. To maximize income and EE, the model suggested growing Phulae pineapple through integrated farming in an entire farm area to achieve the defined objective functions. However, considering risk, a new risk-efficient farm plan was recommended by replacing part of the area of the integrated Phulae with the integrated Nanglae. Diversification is an effective risk-reducing technique as a combination between the integrated Nanglae and integrated Phulae that have negative co-variances can help to stabilize farm income by lowering aggregate risk.
... In the literature consulted, there are various studies on the LCA of pineapple with different valorization methods; their main impact categories are GHG emissions, water, and energy consumption [16,17]. Besides including the production impact categories, Usubharatana and Phungrassami [18], and Frankowska, Jeswani, and Azapagic [19], include pineapple (Cayena Lisa) packed in syrup, accounting for the use of organic and synthetic fertilizers, herbicides, and fossil fuels. It was found that fertilization contributes up to 79% of the carbon footprint from the agricultural stage, while fuel, chemical products, and packaging for the industrial phase contribute 42% of CO 2 eq. ...
... Figure 6 shows the comparison of the results of the carbon and water footprints in the agricultural stage from the literature to the current LCA for the production of 1 kg of fresh pineapple. Usubharatana and Phungrassami [18] quantified a low value in the carbon footprint (0.172 kg of CO 2 eq.). This could be because bioorganic fertilizers were used in their process. ...
... Nazri [55] reported a share of 45.7% as a result of the consumption of fertilizers from the fruit cultivation stage, which is a value close to that shown in the current LCA. Figure 6 shows the comparison of the results of the carbon and water footprints in the agricultural stage from the literature to the current LCA for the production of 1 kg of fresh pineapple. Usubharatana and Phungrassami [18] quantified a low value in the carbon footprint (0.172 kg of CO2 eq.). This could be because bioorganic fertilizers were used in their process. ...
In this research, environmental impacts associated with the harvest and processing of pineapple (fresh-packed, in syrup, and dehydrated) were determined using the life cycle assessment (LCA) tool and specialized software SimaPro® (version 8.4), according to ISO14040:2006 and ISO14044:2006 standards. The information used to develop inventory included field interviews and industrial visits within the study area. The functional unit was defined as one kilogram of fruit. The selected impact categories were carbon footprint, water footprint, and energy footprint; the results obtained for the agronomic stage were 0.47 kg CO2 eq (equivalent), 78 L of water, and 9.09 MJ, respectively. The growth stage of the pineapple plant was found to be the one that generates greatest environmental impacts for all three categories. For packaged fruit, 0.58 kg CO2 eq, 82 L of water, and 11.03 MJ were quantified; for pineapples in syrup it was 1.12 kg CO2 eq, 103 L of water, and 19.28 MJ; and for dehydrated fruit, it was 5.12 kg CO2 eq, 782 L of water and 97.04 MJ. This concludes that the most significant environmental impact occurred in all cases during the pineapple cultivation stage.
Dietary transitions are important for combating many of the environmental challenges humanity is facing today and reducing the global burden of disease. Different dietary patterns are associated with substantially different carbon footprints (CFs). This study aims to estimate the potential CF reduction on a transition from the current Danish diet to a plant-rich diet consistent with the Danish food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) and to compare results obtained from the use of two different CF databases. Dietary intake data for adults aged 18–64 y from the national dietary survey 2011–2013 were used to calculate the CF of the current diet, and this was compared with the estimated CF of the plant-rich diet modelled for the FBDG. Calculations were carried out using an attributional life cycle assessment (LCA) database (AU-DTU data) and compared to calculations using a top-down hybrid consequential LCA database (BCD data). The transition from the current diet to the plant-rich diet showed a substantial estimated CF reduction of 31% with AU-DTU data, and a greater reduction with BCD data (43%). Ruminant meat reduction was the largest contributor to this CF reduction, especially with the use of BCD data, and other animal-based foods also contribute considerably to the CF reduction, especially with AU-DTU data. These results indicate that the choice of LCA methodology and CF database is important in estimation of dietary CF and for the development of guidelines to promote dietary change.
Fertilization of vitroplants in the acclimatization stage is vital to achieve a good plants adaptation to different conditions of in vitro culture. The pineapple that has a period of acclimatization of 5 months can diminish the same if new variants of fertilization are applied more efficient so this work has as aim to evaluate the effect of five packages of foliar fertilization on morpho-physiological variables of plants Micropropagated pineapples (Ananas comosus var. comosus) MD-2 during the acclimatization phase. Four new fertilization variants were designed based on products obtained from the Meristem and Inagrosa firms. Three variants of the firm Meristem, a variant of the firm Inagrosa, were designed and compared with the established procedure for fertilization of the pineapple (control). Morphological and physiological variables were evaluated: fresh and dry mass of the plant (g), plant length (cm), number of leaves, fresh and dry mass of "D" leaf (g), "D" Leaf length and width (cm), number of roots, length of major root (cm), fresh and dry mass of root (g), fresh and dry mass of leaf "D" (g) and with respect to area (g cm-2), water content (%) and survival percentage (%). The results showed that variants 1 and 3 of Meristem achieved better development of pineapple plants in the five months of acclimatization compared to the control treatment and with the other variants applied. The best results are reached in the variables length, fresh and dry mass of the plant, D" leaf length and width and fresh and dry mass of roots.