Figure - uploaded by Ana Vulevic
Content may be subject to copyright.
Assessment of ecological status/potential of watercourses based on physical and chemical elements of quality in 2015 and 2016
Source publication
This paper aimed to point out not only the main sources of water pollution in the Drina River basin but
also the inevitability and importance of an integrative transboundary solution to water management issues, thus
maintaining good quality surface and underground water in the context of overall environmental protection and
health. This paper did q...
Contexts in source publication
Context 1
... quality was class I/II on the Bajina Bašta profile. Assessment of ecological status/potential of watercourses based on physical and chemical elements of quality Drina and Sava water area, in 2015 and 2016, are shown in Table 1. Ammonium ion (NH4-N) (mgl-1) 0,10 0,08 Nitrites (NO2-N) (mgl-1) 0,009 0,007 Nitrates (NO3-N) (mgl-1) 0,50 0,50 Total nitrogen (mgl-1) 0,7 2,4 Orthophosphates (mgl-1) 0,024 0,019 Total Phosphorus (mgl-1) 0,040 0,032 Chlorides (mgl-1) 2,5 2,5 Assessment of ecological status / potential good and better good and better The water quality meets requirements and is good based on a comparative analysis of SWQI4 index. ...Context 2
... quality was class I/II on the Bajina Bašta profile. Assessment of ecological status/potential of watercourses based on physical and chemical elements of quality Drina and Sava water area, in 2015 and 2016, are shown in Table 1. Ammonium ion (NH4-N) (mgl-1) 0,10 0,08 Nitrites (NO2-N) (mgl-1) 0,009 0,007 Nitrates (NO3-N) (mgl-1) 0,50 0,50 Total nitrogen (mgl-1) 0,7 2,4 Orthophosphates (mgl-1) 0,024 0,019 Total Phosphorus (mgl-1) 0,040 0,032 Chlorides (mgl-1) 2,5 2,5 Assessment of ecological status / potential good and better good and better The water quality meets requirements and is good based on a comparative analysis of SWQI4 index. ...Citations
... Numerous experts and scholars have assessed vulnerability in various contexts [9][10][11]. In the realm of water vulnerability [12,13], the focus has primarily been on water resources [14][15][16] and groundwater [17][18][19]. Sun and Kato [20] estimated the vulnerability of the urban water environment by quantifying vulnerability indicators for urban water resources. ...
A vulnerability assessment system for rainwater pipe networks, comprising 13 indexes, was developed to facilitate the rational allocation and timely updating of urban storm drainage systems. An enhanced Borda combination evaluation method, which considers both the optimal and worst solutions, was proposed, accompanied by the operation procedure and numerical calculation method. Five stormwater systems in Central China were selected as case studies, and their vulnerability was evaluated and compared using five distinct evaluation methods: the entropy weight method, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), the efficacy coefficient method, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, and the improved fuzzy Borda combination evaluation method. The results demonstrated that the correlation coefficients between the fuzzy Borda combination evaluation method and the four individual evaluation methods were equal to or greater than 0.88, indicating strong agreement. Additionally, the compatibility of the combination evaluation method was found to be 0.96. This study holds both theoretical significance and practical value for preventing urban waterlogging and contributes to the development of more resilient urban storm drainage systems.
