Accuracy of low-, mid-, and high-performers in Stage 2 and Stage 4 for each experimental condition.

Accuracy of low-, mid-, and high-performers in Stage 2 and Stage 4 for each experimental condition.

Source publication
Preprint
Full-text available
Human-AI collaboration for decision-making strives to achieve team performance that exceeds the performance of humans or AI alone. However, many factors can impact success of Human-AI teams, including a user's domain expertise, mental models of an AI system, trust in recommendations, and more. This work examines users' interaction with three simula...

Context in source publication

Context 1
... addition, single-sample t-tests with a reference value equal to the accuracy of the AI-Assistant (75 percent) were used to analyze each cluster's Stage 4 accuracy relative to the accuracy of the AI-Assistant. Figure 5 shows users' accuracy results for Stage 2 and Stage 4, by Table 3. Users' performance in terms of accuracy for Stage 1 (without AI + feedback), Stage 2 (without AI + no feedback), Stage 3 (with AI + feedback), and Stage 4 (with AI + no feedback) by performance cluster. Low-performers significantly improved in accuracy from Stage 2 to Stage 4 (í µí± < .001). ...

Similar publications

Preprint
Full-text available
People spend a significant amount of time trying to make sense of the internet, collecting content from a variety of sources and organizing it to make decisions and achieve their goals. While humans are able to fluidly iterate on collecting and organizing information in their minds, existing tools and approaches introduce significant friction into...