1) in usual PL it can be difficult to attribute spectral maxima to the particular transitions, especially in novel, not very known and pure materials. In this case time-resolved PL just provides additional information, which makes easier to distinguish between, for example, exciton and e-A0, D0-A0 and so on, since they have different life-times. Also, additional information can be obtained via magneto-PL studies, etc. 2) Time resolved PL may be useful to study basic intersubband phenomena in QDs and QWs. For example, you can study intersubband dynamics using visible-light spectroscopy, which is much easy than IR, where usually intesubband energies lie.

Second possibility is that the PMA binds covalently only after sufficient expose to visible light. if the exposure is not proper then there would be amplification. best of luck

Yeah, I agree with Devang, that impact factor cannot be considered as a sole criteria, as now a days there are so many open access journals definitely have easy and wide circulation, thus have good impact. However having good impact does neither means that they published quality research or nor that they does not published good research. In my opinion, publishing your research with the journal of repute (either have impact factor or not) is much important.

I think it is a good idea but technically how it should be done needs calrification. RG in the present format to an extent is doing it pretty well in this direction (many students have approached me thro RG).. What is the different idea ? ?

"Are YBCO or similar..." of course. Sorry for this error

Thank you Valeria and Daniele for your valid reply.

As per IS 875 live load for auditorium shall be considered for this

Done.

The Economist: http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21578041-containers-have-been-more-important-globalisation-freer-trade-humble

Roy Niles · 4.79 I invite any readers that remain here to google this phrase: "To show that lying is as natural as breathing, Smith presents a lively survey of the many forms of deception practiced by plants, insects, and animals." They'll find references to scientific studies galore. I don't give a hoot in hell, Darryl, what you do. Mar 19, 2013 Darryl Smith · 7.95 · Independent Researcher Smith who? What is his full name? What journal is this scientific paper published in? Was it peer-reviewed? What is the link?

Yes we do observe laser line from the sample as well. Our samples seems high quality from X-ray diffraction. We observe a sharp peak of ZnO(002) from XRD.

Hi, In answer to your main question antibody titre alone is not indicative in fish that there is a protective immune response so the quick answer is that measuring antibody titre is not sufficient by itself as some aquatic microbial pathogens evoke a cellular immune response and the humoral (circulating antibodies) values might be high when measured post-antigen exposure, but will not give a protective response when the fish are then exposed to the pathogen after vaccination. You may have already said this in a previous post but it would be good to know what adjuvant (if any) were used with your vaccine? Did you use an adjuvant only group to compare the antibody titres between the groups? Your results do seem to suggest that you have a protective response from the "vaccine" administered but a control group is required (I think that you have included that already but just asking again), which should be a control group for the vaccine as well as the pathogen and the adjuvant (if you added any) - if no adjuvant added then the control group without pathogen would do. I agree with the comment by Pedram that you do need to see the proportion of fish at the end of the trial that still have the bacteria. Happy to discuss this further if it is helpful. Good luck!

CdS/CdSe are also useful for the best solar cell applications.and in case of energy transfer those two are potential candidates .some of the applications of solar cell may be utilized by CuO windos .i think it is best of my knowledge

Dear Varsha, There could be many reasons for failure of your experiments. Unless you discuss the whole experiment with someone thoroughly no one is able to find out what went wrong and when. so please give details.

This shall be treated as dead weight

Hi, like Naureen, I usually use Primer3 for primer design as you have good control over the parameters, and then I check the proposed primer pairs with OligoAnalyzer. Although it still happens that some primers don't work in the end. I hope it works for you.

Actually the solvent selection is on the basis of polarity and the nature of phytochemical constituents present in the drug. If you have an entirely new material of which you don't know anything about the constituents, then you should proceed with solvents in the order of increasing polarity. If you know the phytoconstituents, then on the basis of their solubility in the particular solvent, you can select the solvent. It is a general practice to defat the plant material with petroleum ether or hexane prior to using any other solvent to ease further process of isolation of constituents. Then choose the solvents in which your constituent is reported to be soluble and you can get it in the particular solvent after extraction.

on-line software where You can upload Your spectra http://www.massbank.jp/?lang=en

It all depends on the type of Your analytes. If they are stable and do not degrade, such samples can be stored for a long period of time. However, there is no straight answer how long such samples can be stored. You can always freeze them at -80C

Figures of crosslinked samples incubated at 37C for 10 minutes show no reversal; http://jb.asm.org/content/187/18/6536.figures-only

Dear Jeda, You can do SNP studies or even marker based selection studies.

Now a days there are many software available are structural design like staad pro, etabs, struds etc. However the structure you want to design you should able image and visualize then you will have better control on design

with standard freezing methods (FCS 10%DMSO) I get a good recovery of PBMC. phenotype by FACS looks always OK after thawing but proliferation is affected. Compared to freshly isolated PBMC frozen PBMC proliferate less (-20 -40% less) also with a good cell recovery expecially if you use antigens. with CD3/CD28 is fine

Dear Jesus, I tried the links and they seem to work fine although a bit slow... I will contact the administrator of the website and I will inform him about this. For the moment check this link which directly connects you to the guidelines. http://www.innovaproject.net/typo3/index.php?id=1440 Apologies for any inconvenience that this might have caused!