- Isacco Gualandi added an answer:1How can the concentration of peroxyl radical be determined in seawater?
Free radical are photochemically generated in seawater such as hydroxyl radicals, nitric oxide radical, superoxide radical and probably peroxyl radicals. Is there any developed method for its measurement?
The very high reactivity of such radicals is responsible for their short half-lifes (about 10−10 s for hydroxyl radical) which explains why their concentration is generally very low. Their direct determination is quite difficult for some matrices. For example the in vivo measurement of OH radical by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) fails because the presence of scavengers leads to an extremely low steady-state concentration. The simplest way to detect them is indirect, i.e. by using a probe which reacts very quickly with them. In function of the probe that is used, different detection techniques can be used. Nevertheless such kind of determination usually estimates the total amount of produced radicals and not their concentration (I Gualandi, D Tonelli Talanta 115, 779-786, 2013; C. von Sonntag Free-Radical-Induced DNA Damage and Its RepairSpringer, Heildenberg (2006)).
I give you some additional information.
Determination of hydroxyl radical is ussualy performed with the use of a probe. The product of the reaction between the probe and the radical are determined by HPLC. Several probes are used. The most common is the salicylic acid but the accuracy of the measure is debated. This paper can interest you (Determination of hydroxyl radicals photochemically generated in surface waters under sunlight by high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection, Anal. Methods, 2014, 6, 8193).
Superoxide radical can be determined also without the use of a probe. Some electrochemical sensors exploit the superoxide dismutase to reach a good selectivity. Also the probe can be used.
The determination of peroxyl radicals is quite difficult. I carefully searched some papers that described their determination for a different matrix (atmosphere) some years ago, but I found nothing.Following
- Luis Antonio Ochoa-Ramírez added an answer:2Does anyone have a ROS detection protocol for flow cytometry using the ROS/superoxide kit?
I want to detect ROS production in the cells am using. I therefore bought an Abcam (ab139476) detection kit.
There is a statement on the protocol I do not understand..
"If the vehicle, experiment agent and ROS inducer will be added to the ROS/Superoxide Detection solution (2X), their concentration need to be 2X. For the negative control, 1X of the inhibitor needs to be compensated in the solution to maintain its final concentration at the same level."
1. Does it mean that if I add 100microliter of ROS/Superoxide detection solution, I need to add 100 microliter of treatment, vehicle or inducer?
2. For the inhibitor, does it mean I have to aspirate the previous solution and add a fresh one together with the ROS detection solution?
Also in this statement,,,,,,
"To every 10ml of 1X washing buffer or culture medium, add 4microliter Oxidative stress detection reagent (Green) and 4 microliter superoxide detection reagent (orange).
Gently mix to make 1:2500 dilution staining solution. To prepare smaller volumes of 2X ROS/Superoxide detection mix, intermediate 1:10 dilution of both green and orange detection reagents in 1X Wash Buffer or culture media is recommended."
3. What does this exactly mean? if you can use an example that would be really helpful, Thanks.
4. If you have used a similar (don't have to be the same) kit, could you please be kind enough to share the protocol, thank you.
As you normally use concentrations, if you add i.e. 100 ul of 20 ug/ml treatment, vehicle or inducer (TVI) when you add the 100 ul of 2x detection solution (DS) you will have 200 ul of 10 ug/ml TVI plus 1x detection buffer. In other works, if your well/tube is labeled 10 ug/ml you have to add 20 ug/ml (2x), as the former would be your final (working, 1x) concentration. It is just a reminder of the provider to keep track of the REAL concentration you are working with at each well (or tube).
It is the instruction to prepare 1:2500 DS: 10 ml=10000 ul, if 1 ul in 10000 = 1:10000, then 4 ul in 10000= 4:10000 or 1:2500. Is to be followed strictly (or so is implied, read further). The second part states that it is not recommended to add less than 4 ul of the detection reagents (DR) , so to prepare less than 10 ml of detection mix you will have to dilute the 4 ul of DR anything between 1:2 to 1:10 (4 ul DR + 4 ul 1x wash buffer/media and 4 ul DR + 36 ul 1x wash buffer/media, respectively), so you can prepare from 5 ml to 1 ml, respectively. The dilution of the 4 ul has to be done PRIOR to taking the dilution to the final volume.
Hope this (not to clear) explanation helps.
- Pushpendra Singh added an answer:6Can anyone suggest simple calorimetry based assay for detection of Reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and superoxide?
Actually on the stress condition cells produce ROS and RNS that ultimately leads to cellular oxidative stress. HOW can detect RNS and superoxides
Thanks dear, Nai-Kei Wong sirFollowing
- Ricardo Pérez-Pastén added an answer:9What's the best procedure to determine SOD activity in trout ?
I want to determine SOD activity in liver, gill and muscle and in many publication the method use "xanthine method" or "pyrogallol method"
We used RANSOD SOD kit from Randox Company. We adapted to 96 well microplate and results were consistent and reproducible. With this setting, the kit gave us 80 tests per 20 ml reagent bottle.Following
- Radia Slimani added an answer:3Is there any simple and reliable superoxide anion scavenging assay for testing antioxidant?
Is there any simple and reliable superoxide anion scavenging assay for testing antioxidant?
you can also use the cytochrome C reduction assay for superoxide anion measurementFollowing
- Frederick E Domann added an answer:4Could NADPH dependent Nox activity be more sensitively detected in an EcSOD deficient background?
Certain membrane associated Nox family enzymes (1,2 & 4) make superoxide, but extracellular superoxide dismutase (EcSOD, Sod3) removes superoxide. Therefore, tissue specific EcSOD deficient cells or organisms mice could be used to detect Nox derived superoxide with greater sensitivity.
Thanks to all that responded so far !! The comments about INTRAcellular SODs are very important; thanks Rajesh and Just for that insight. And thanks Just and Igor for the suggestion of the chemiluminescence assay. However, as to the specificity of the chemiluminescence method for detecting membrane associated NADPH dependent Nox activity, that is problematic to me and many others and its use for this purpose has been recently challenged: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25906178Following
- Martyna Elas added an answer:3Has anyone experienced increased Dihydroethidium (DHE) but decreased mitoSOX red when treated with ROS-inducing compound?
Hi guys, I am recently testing a drug that is supposed to increase the superoxide production in cancer cells. However, I noticed the DHE staining (cytosolic superoxide) increased whereas the mitoSOX (mitochondrial superoxide) decreased. Any suggestion/explanation for this? I think it's worth trying the staining of the mitochondrial membrane potential in parallel with mitoSOX because as I know the Mitosox Red accumulates in the mitochondria on the basis of its membrane potential.
Dear Han Shen,
it may also depend on what type of drug you are using - where exactly the ROS are generated. If in the cytosol, or even outside cells, then the results you are getting is quite plausible. If you are expecting an increased mitochondrial respiration, then you should be getting an increase in Mitosox red fluorescence.
- Norbert Bittner added an answer:11Can an increased level of hydrogen peroxide reverse the reaction of superoxide dismutase in an assay ?
I'm having the problem that in my SOD assay (NBT assay, Pyrogallol assay) the sample reaction is showing a faster O2- production than the blank of the SOD standards. Means that the samples are way darker in color after 5min of reaction than the SOD blank. I'm working with Sephadex desalted pine crude extracts.
So far none of the assays worked unfortunately... But thanks for your hintsFollowing
- Sourav Laha added an answer:1I want to calculate the torsion angle between a superoxide and peroxide anion in GSAS. Anyone knows how it can be calculated in GSAS?
I have ~200 tof neutron diffraction dataset (T-dep.). I have analysed the datasets by sequential refinements using GSAS. However, I could not figure out how i can calculate the torsion angle sequentially between the two vectors; superoxide and peroxide anions. I used Materials Studio which provides a tool to measure the torsion angle between these two vectors but i have to get an estimated error which is not provided in materials studio.
If you are using EXPGUI of GSAS pacakge,
You can go to Results to geometry
A question will appear 'Print input atoms? <Y/N>' you can choose an option
Next question will be 'Enter geometry option <some options>' you can type '?' to get the details of the options or directly type 'a' for computing dihedral angle and follow the steps.
If you are using GSAS, there should be something similar but I am not familiar with it.
Hope it will help you
- P. Pardha-Saradhi added an answer:4What is the mechanism of superoxide anion free radical scavenging assay?
what is the mechanism of superoxide anion free radical scavenging assay of plant extract?
Protocols that are widely being used (that we also use) involve (i) generation of superoxide anion radicals (either by exposing riboflavin to light in presence of electron donors, or throught PMS-NADH system or xanthine-xanthine oxidase system); and (ii) reaction of superoxide anion radicals with certaing molecules/biomolecules to yield a product that can be determined spectrophotometrically (production of nitrite in first case, formation of formazan in the second case and reduction of cytochrome c in third case); Higher the concentration of superoxide anion radicals more would the generation of nitrite, formazon or reduction od cytochrome C. Therefore, in presence of superoxide desmutase that uses superoxide anion radicals as substrate, one would expect decrease in the formation of nitrite, formazan or reduction of cytochrome C. Accordingly, higher the SOD activity lesser would be the formation of nitrite, formazan or reduction of cytochrome C.Following
- Samuel Chuah added an answer:3Can all members of Reactive Oxygen species induce breakage in Graphene Oxide sheets? (GQD production)
Photo- Fenton reaction mediated fabrication of Graphene Quatum Dots is well recorded. Keeping in view of the oxidative action of the hydroxyl ions hence produced, I am curious about the ability of other reactive species (like that of superoxide ion, singlet oxygen) in breaking the GO sheets.
From my limited knowledge on oxidation of GO, the attachment of oxygen functional groups to the basal plane of GO (epoxide, carboxyl, hydroxyl and carbonyl) does break the grapheme sheetsFollowing
- Nai-Kei Wong added an answer:2Does anyone know the rate constant for the generation of superoxide by NOX enzymes please and if so the reference?
Kinetics of redox enzymes
Thank you for sharing. It's an interesting question with few references, in part because NOX is a complex requiring multiple subunits to function. The in vitro reconstitution work was an admirable effort.Following
- Micheal S Ward added an answer:4Normalisation of OXPHOS by CS (ie complex respiration rates) is standard protocol. So should OXPHOS by-products (ie SO) also be treated as such?
I am a diabetic complications researcher and I'm carrying out a number of measurements on freshly isolated mitochondria, such as respiration by Seahorse technology. I normalise this data by citrate synthase activity as I realise the enzyme is rate limiting in the TCA cycle for citrate production. Therefore I have been attempting to reconcile if normalisation of by-products of OXPHOS are also needed in the likes of superoxide, hydrogen peroxide which I have measured by MitoSOX and Amplex red assays respectively. I am also carrying out MnSOD activity assays for identification of possible changes in dissipating enzyme activities.
Thank you for the response, I have downloaded your excerpt and will read through it as I have some of your work on other mitochondrial topics. I find your pieces of work to be quite frank and offering a facts based opinion that differs with deemed 'conventional' methods being highly published and fascinating which allows for my greater critical analysis.
- Emilia Wojtera added an answer:3Does anybody know another form of generate superoxide radicals for superoxide dismutase determination diferent of xanthine and xanthine oxidase?
High I need proof another form of generate superoxide radicals for superoxide dismutase determination with the reduction of citocrome C, that be different of radicals generate by xanthine/xanthine oxidase.
You can use hypoxanthine or xanthine, try with diazoxide, ET-1, AngII...Following
- Alexander V Panov added an answer:11Does ambient proton concentration (pH) alter the behavior of ROS/RNS?
Let me preface this by saying I am not a biochemist. My logic may be very incorrect, but I'm looking for some guidance from someone who has a much stronger grasp on this field. Or if anyone can point me toward an appropriate reference. It's not an easy topic to google search; too many unrelated results.
My question is more of a curiosity. I am wondering whether the behavior/concentration ROS like super-oxide and others (the more reactive species) would interact with the ambient proton concentration in a cellular compartment. To put this question another way, I'm wondering if decreasing the pH would tend to "quench"/reduce the generation of highly reactive and potentially damaging species.
Isn't this essentially what antioxidant compounds do? They function as proton donors? I suspect there is a deeper level of information related to the energetic exchange that I'm not aware of.
To also ask the reverse question: Would the biological generation of ROS/RNS (say, via mitochondrial dysfunction) alter the availability of protons/influence the local pH?
I would like to add another 5 cents to the current discussion.
When discussing pH, we should remember several important issues: 1) pH is in most bulk environments, we usually consider cytosol and mitochondrial matrix, is highly buffered. In the matrix pH may remain constant even though the ΔΨ may drop significantly; 2) the mitochondrial matrix is a hard gel, therefore, if there are changes in pH they occur locally in a narrow space either near an enzyme, which produces or consumes a proton, or near the membrane; 3) The metabolic events, including production of superoxide radicals or their removal, which are coupled to other metabolic events, occur in the multienzyme complexes and proceed usually irreversibly.
One of the most important species of ROS is the hydroperoxyl radical, also known as the perhydroxyl radical, which is the protonated form of superoxide with the chemical formula HO2. Hydroperoxyl is formed through the transfer of a proton to an oxygen atom. The concentration of O2 in the lipid phase of the membrane is 4-5 times higher than in the extra-membrane environment, and the superoxide anion is rapidly extruded from the membranes. The superoxide anion, O2•−, and the hydroperoxyl radical are in equilibrium in aqueous solution: O2•− + H2O is in equilibrium with HO2 + OH−. The protonation/deprotonation equilibrium exhibits a pKa of 4.88; consequently, about 0.3% of any superoxide present in the cytosol of a typical cell is in the protonated form. Although HO2 is also less hydrophobic and thus excluded from the lipid phase of membranes, nevertheless, it is more soluble in lipids than superoxide anion. I think that major formation of HO2 occurs not in the cytosol, but in the water-containing space near the superoxide-producing center inside the membrane. Unlike O2−, which predominantly acts as a reductant, HO2 can act as an oxidant in a number of biologically important reactions, such as the abstraction of hydrogen atoms from tocopherol and polyunsaturated fatty acids in the lipid bilayer. As such, it may be an important initiator of lipid peroxidation. The concentration of HO2 in the membrane may depend on local pH. I think that changes of pH in the bulk environments (cytosol or incubation medium) have little influence on reactions, which occur locally in the membranes and the membrane’s micro-environment near the enzyme’s center where superoxide is formed.Following
- David Tapley added an answer:5What is the best activity assay for Catalase & SOD activity in Cnidarian?
I need a kit that is sensitive and not time consuming. Thank you.
I used several methods on cnidarian tissues in the past -- I ended up settling on the nitro blue tetrazolium method for SOD (Spitz and Oberly) and the modified (as in the Sigma catalog) method of Beers and Sizer for CAT. Message me with your email and I can probably dig up my old protocols and send them to you.Following
- Daniel Medeiros Lima added an answer:3What is the best method for quantify ROS in heart sections?
What of method is more specific to measure ROS in cardiac sections of rats? DHE is not very specific, however I see many publications using the method.
Thank you for your help.
Thanks Adam and Karel, their information were of great help.Following
- Ryan D. Taylor added an answer:4Any suggestions on BMPO Spin Trap Hydroxyl/Superoxide Adduct formation rates?
I am looking for information on the formation rates of two radical adducts BMPO/OH and BMPO/OOH. There are many studies on the formation of these radical adducts using xanthine oxidase or Fenton reactons but there does not appear to be anything on competitive reaction rates (cases where the OH radical and OO- radical are competitively reacting with BMPO).
Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for that great information Deborah! I really appreciate the insight.Following
- Tarana Arman added an answer:2What is the minimum amount of DHE (Dihydroethidium) that could be used to detect the superoxide ions in saccharomyces cerevisiae?
I have induced a chromium stressed condition for the yeast culture and want to assess the ROS increase in them. However, I am unable to decide upon the upper and lower limits for the amount of DHE to be used.
Thanks Philippe, your answer was indeed helpful.Following
- Mustafa Yavuz Köker added an answer:1Does CD40 expression on B cells require reactive oxygen species?
CD40 expression on B cell has superoxide dependent pathway? So since CGD patients lacks superoxide production do they express CD40 on B cells?
NADPH oxidase activity order Neutrophil>monocytes>eosinophil>dendiritic cell>B cell,
For CD40, I think yes. But it is very complex, need pathway analysis. CD40 deficiency is another immunodeficiency. NADPH oxidase modulate it, but does not dependent. I think.Following
- Karel Chalupsky added an answer:4Does anyone know of a protocol for qualitative assessment of the presence of superoxide dismutase in bacteria?
I would like to screen my bacterial isolates for their ability to detoxify superoxide through superoxide dismutase. I would like to know of any rapid qualitative test to assess if my isolates have this enzyme. Most of the searches I have initially done involve spectophotometric analysis.
25 µM cytochrome in PBS was incubated for 5min at 37 C with addition of KO2. The absorbance was read spectrophotometrically at 550 nm against distilled water blank. Reduction of cytochrome c in the presence of SOD (100U/ml) was subtracted from the values without SOD. The absorbance differences between comparable wells with or without SOD were converted to equivalent O2•− release by using the molecular extinction coefficient for cytochrome c of 21 mM−1 cm−1
30000Units (sigma # S-8160)
Stock 30000U/ml (30U/ul) then freeze aliquots of 50ul
30 U/ul so 50ul =1500U then add 250 ul water ->1500 U /300 ul = 5 U/ul
dilute above 1 : 4 with PBS so have 1 U/ul -> then 60ul = 60 U
Add 60ul of SOD to a well of 6-well plate containing the 480 ul PBS (sample)
the total volume will be 600ul so the conc. of SOD is 100 U/ml
Cytochrome c partially acetylated (Sigma # C-4186)
Cytochrome c from hourse heart ( # C-2506)
6.19 mg cytochrome / 2 ml = 3.1mg / ml = 250uM
Solution is only good for a few hours!
Light and oxygen sensitive keep solution in the dark and covered!
Add 60 ul of cytochrome c to sample solution – final volume 600ul (final c of cytochrome c is 25uM)
Read absorbance at 540, 540 and 560nm
To calculate the cytochrome c absorbance use the pathlenght corrected values only:
Take average of the readings at 540nm and 560 nm (540nm + 560nm)/2
From the readings at 550nm subtract this average 550nm –[( 540nm+560nm)/2]
This subtracts the baseline from absorbance 550nm peak for reduced cytochrome c
Potassium superoxide solution (3mg in 1ml) in absolute DMSO was used as superoxide donor. Due to low solubility and possibly water content in DMSO, the real concentration of superoxide anion was detected by cytochrome c reduction and calculated using molecular extinction coefficient for cytochrome c of 21 mM−1 cm−1 .
USE xanthin oxidase system as superoxide generation system. It is more reliable and physiologic.Following
- Tatiana Y. Karogodina added an answer:3Anyone has experience on EPR on total tissue to measure superoxides and hydroxyl free radicals ?
Hi, I am trying to measure superoxide levels using EPR with DMPO as a spin trap. I had tried in isolated mitochondria and I got nice spectra (only in presence of inhibitors). Now I like to use total tissue, kidney and heart. If any of you have tried this can you provide conditions such as buffers and how you homogenize the tissue.
Also, anyone has experience in injecting spin trap into animals and measuring EPR later ? Ideally I want to perform in vivo measurements, or something close to that.
I suggest to see papers of Komarov DA. For example this one: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22162021
- P. Pardha-Saradhi added an answer:1What si the best protocol for NBT staining in tomato leaves for detection of superoxide radicals?Can anyone please suggest the best protocol for NBT staining (for suproxide radicals) in tomato leaves. Could you also suggest how, after staining, I can efficiently remove chlorophyll without damaging leaves and heat burning.
Following NBT staining for 12 to 24 h), you can remove all pigments (including chlorophylls) with the exception of formazon by dipping leaves in clearing reagent (3:1 ratio of TCA and phenol). Kindly handle clearing agent carefull taking all necessary precautions. You can leave leaves for 6 to 24 h depending on intensity of various pigments (if you want to hasten the process you may keep it in oven for 30 to 60 min at 60oC). Subsequently, decant clearing reagent carefully without damaging leaves (or you can lift the leaves carefully with a good blunt forceps and transfer to a fresh petriplate or a plastic box and add lactophenol. If you wish you can replace lactophenol after few hours. You can infact store your cleared leaves with nice colour of formazon in lactophenol as long as you want. Be careful in using clearing reagent. If you take proper precautions you will find this method to be most simple.
- Francisco J Sánchez-Gómez added an answer:7Can anyone suggest specific scavenger(s) for superoxide but not for ROS?
I am looking for the reagent which can scavenge superoxide in living cells. Most of ROS scavenger, like tempol, inhibit not only superoxide accumulation but also reactive nitrogen spices (RNS). But I am actually looking at the effect of RNS in oxidative stress but not superoxide. Dose anyone know the cell permeable superoxide scavenger?
We have used PEG-SOD, a cell permeable analogue to dismutate superoxide, but, you have to take in account the kinetics of the enzymes, doses and toxicity. Other compound you can use is TIRON. It is very effective and specific for superoxide.
Free Radic Biol Med. 2014 Jun;71:146-56. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
Acute hypoxia produces a superoxide burst in cells.
- Benson Solomon added an answer:4Is there any other superoxide radical scavengers except TBA? Can you also give the referance?
I want to identity that if the superoxide radicals were involved in Fenton reaction. I need to use superoxide radical scavengers except TBA. Thank you.
MCLA and lucigenin are two superoxide probes our group has used for superoxide measurementsFollowing
- Mathieu Pierre added an answer:2What is best chemical to induce oxidative stress selectively by superoxide anions?But not by other ions such as hydroxyl etc. I wants to elevate superoxide level selectively in the cells.
you can use DCMUFollowing
- Praveen Roylawar asked a question:OpenHow to: superoxide radical detection by spectrofluorometer?
I did Nbt staining in tomato leaves to detect superoxide radicals (Blue formazol formation). Now I want to detect the same radicals using a spectrofluorometer. Can anyone please explain to me how to do it ? Can I use the same sample (formazol precipitated sample) for spectrofluorometric analysis or do I have to use an unstained sample?
- Katarina Venglovska added an answer:3Does anyone have any suggestions on doing an SOD assay using the Marklund and Marklund protocol?I am performing the SOD assay using the pyrogallol protocol by Marklund and Marklund for estimating SOD from serum. I am not getting the desired results. I'm using a 30 mM concentration of pyrogallol, but my reading of serum is more than the pyrogallol reading.
Can anyone suggest any solutions.Following
- Shane Vontelin van Breda added an answer:6Can anyone give advice on Fenton reaction inhibition in M. tuberculosis?I am investigating the mechanism of action of a cationic peptide against MTB. I suspect one of the mechanisms is by the Fenton reaction. One way I would like to prove this is by use of thiourea and dipyridyl, as they have been used before in inhibiting the Fenton reaction.
Does anybody have an idea of what concentrations I should begin looking at against MTB?
Has anybody got any experience investigating and inhibiting Fenton reaction again against MTB?
I would also like to ask about the preparation of thiourea and dipyridyl. Should it be added to bacterial media, then autoclaved? Or should the compounds be added to the autoclaved media using filter sterilization?
Thank you Boris.Following
Highly reactive compounds produced when oxygen is reduced by a single electron. In biological systems, they may be generated during the normal catalytic function of a number of enzymes and during the oxidation of hemoglobin to METHEMOGLOBIN. In living organisms, SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE protects the cell from the deleterious effects of superoxides.