Follow a topic to ask questions, get answers and
share interesting content with other
researchers working in your field.
Information exchange on Open Access topics in scientific publishing
- Science is all about data, but we scientists (at least biologists) are not specialists of data. I spend so much time organizing data, and wonder if we can use Ruby on Rails-like approaches toRecent replies ⋅ Show All (1)
Alexandre Leurs.
I recently found a program named ATLAS ti for qualitative analysis, you might wanna check it out
- Many research scientists I have spoken to have expressed frustration at several aspects of modern science journals; how they select their work to publish, their editorial policies, their policy ofRecent replies ⋅ Show All (34)
Anne Marie Talsky
Great discussion. I hope everyone will also pressure their congressional representatives to support passage of the Federal Research Public Access Act of 2012 (FRPAA) in this session to insure future
- Or another reff managerRecent replies ⋅ Show All (5)
Joshua Hill
I have been using Mendeley for a while now. It has it's limitations but so does everything. I switched from Endnote because the Mac support was horrible. It was always crashing and trying to find
- Transparency bad for science? how do you deal with the problem of releasing data to a non-expert, when there is a potential for misinterpretation?Recent replies ⋅ Show All (1)
Andrew Robinson
I used to teach a graduate course on "Communication Skills for Physicists" to try to address this issue. Communication of scientific information to groups other then your own peer group of
- Http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01
/11/opinion/research-bought-th en-paid-for.html?_r=1&ref=caro lynbmaloney Recent replies ⋅ Show All (2)Tere Rodriguez
Thnks for share
- Why have you enjoyed to this network and what are the major bennefits from it? Thanks!Recent replies ⋅ Show All (51)
Ariel Sar
Recién estoy comenzando. No puedo agregarte mucho, pero en principio, permite interactuar con colegas de todo el mundo con los mismos intereses, organizar estudios e investigaciones en grupo, aún de
- An article on the benefits of sharing negative data...Recent replies ⋅ Show All (24)
Mahboob Imtiyaz
For Your Trials and Errors...
- Below is an interesting discussion regarding the Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA) and how to help it become law. I'm interested in others experience in recent years of open access and whatRecent replies ⋅ Show All (5)
Roderick Salisbury
I agree with those who think that the US government, at least, is NOT leading the way in Open Access publishing. The EU Commission, on the other hand, is pushing open accesspublishing for EU funded
- I will appreciate your inputs and comments.Recent replies ⋅ Show All (5)
Alec Ekeroma
I am interested in how Open Access Medical Publications can increase publications from developing countries. 90% of published research is from developed countries and let's say that only 10% of these
- I made an analysis of OA deposit rates at Dutch universities. http://wowter.net/2012/02/10/a
-census-of-open-access-reposit ories-in-the-netherlands/ - University at Cambridge Centre for Molecular Informatics is working to develop another open access and open scholarship initiative...
- University College London is publishing Archaeology International as an open access journal.
- Really curious as to why are researchers so afraid to share what helped them succeed in the first place. Research is a process of trial and error, but sadly these trials and errors are absolutelyRecent replies ⋅ Show All (7)
Joshua Hill
So, yes there needs to be a way to share what you have done that did not work. But to force me to write it up in a journal format to be critiqued by reviewers for me anyways is not the answer. I
- Recently, an experiment by name 'mini big-bang' is successfully conducted. it is aimed to study the formation of universe and the continents on earth.
Post protected
Join ResearchGate now to read this post.Recent replies ⋅ Show All (6)Chris Wilkins
Update: I first saw this boycott less than a week ago. At the time there were a bit more than 1,500 scientists listed. As of this typing it is now at 3,297 scientists. There really must be some very
8209
Followers
