-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study analyzed baseline and post-fatigue reverse-torque values (RTVs) for a specific brand control abutment relative to a third party compatible abutment. The purpose of this study was to compare the abutments' fatigue resistance to simulated function, using RTVs as an indication of residual preload at the implant/abutment interface.
Forty Straumann tissue-level implants were mounted in resin and divided into four groups (n = 10). Forty abutments were seated, 20 control and 20 third-party abutments, according to manufacturer guidelines. Ten abutments from each manufacturer were evaluated for RTV without fatigue loading, using a calibrated digital torque gauge to provide a baseline RTVs. Fatigue loading was carried out on the remaining ten specimens from each manufacturer according to ISO 14801 guidelines. A moving-magnet linear motor was used to load one specimen per sequence, alternating from 10 to 200 N at 15 Hz for 5×10(6) cycles. RTV was recorded post-fatigue loading. The results were subjected to two-sample t-testing and two-way ANOVA. Scanning electron microphotography was carried out on three specimens from both manufacturers at baseline and post-fatigue cycling to visualize thread geometry and the abutment/implant interface.
The data indicated that mean post-fatigue RTV observed for the control group was significantly higher than the third-party group (RTV 42.65 ± 6.70 N vs. 36.25 ± 2.63 N, p= 0.0161). Visual differences at the macro/microscopic level were also apparent for thread geometry, with third-party abutments demonstrating considerably greater variation in geometrical architecture than control specimens.
Within the limitations of this in vitro model, the effect of component manufacturer resulted in a significantly higher RTV in the control group (two-way ANOVA, p= 0.0032) indicating greater residual preload; however, there was no significant decrease in post-fatigue RTV for either manufacturer compared to baseline.
Journal of Prosthodontics 08/2011; 20(7):503-9. · 1.01 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Fracture of acrylic resin prosthetic teeth from acrylic resin denture bases can be a problem for some patients. The optimal combination of acrylic resin denture tooth, denture base material, and processing method is not known. Purpose. The objective of this study was to compare the tensile bond strengths of heat- and microwave-polymerized acrylic resins among 4 types of acrylic resin denture teeth.
Heat-polymerized (Lucitone 199) and microwave-polymerized (Acron MC) acrylic resins were used. Four types of acrylic resin denture teeth (IPN, SLM, Vitapan, and SR-Orthotyp-PE) were milled to a fixed diameter according to ADA specification no. 15. Ten specimens of each tooth type were processed to each of the denture base materials according to the manufacturers' instructions. Ten additional resin control specimens without teeth also were fabricated. Specimens were thermocycled and tested for strength until fracture with a custom alignment device. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test. A scanning electron microscope was used to identify adhesive and cohesive failures within debonded specimens.
The mean force required to fracture the specimens ranged from 5.3 +/- 3.01 to 21.6 +/- 5.2 MPa for the microwave-polymerized base and 11.2 +/- 3.0 to 39.1 +/- 5.1 MPa for the heat-polymerized base. The most common failure was cohesive within the denture tooth. With each base material, Orthotyp and IPN teeth exhibited the highest bond strengths; SLM and Orthotyp bond strengths were similar. In general, heat-polymerized groups failed cohesively within the denture base resin or the tooth, and microwave-polymerized groups failed adhesively at either the ridge lap or occlusal surface of the denture tooth.
Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that the type of denture base material and denture tooth selected for use may influence the tensile bond strength of the tooth to the base. Selection of more compatible combinations of base and resin teeth may reduce the number of prosthesis fractures and resultant repairs.
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 09/2002; 88(2):145-50. · 1.32 Impact Factor
-
Robert L Schneider
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This article describes a technique for the quick and accurate fabrication of custom acrylic resin provisional restorations for the ITI implant system. Materials and procedures common to fixed prosthodontics are used. The technique should necessitate no more chairtime than the fabrication of custom acrylic provisional restorations for conventional fixed prostheses.
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 08/2002; 88(1):105-7. · 1.32 Impact Factor
-
The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 17(6):881-4. · 1.78 Impact Factor
