-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Our purpose in this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new multi-planar dose measurement method. The multi-planar dose distributions were reconstructed at each depth by convolution of EPID fluence and dose kernels with the use of EPIDose software (SunNuclear). The EPIDose was compared with EPID, MapCHECK (SunNuclear), EDR2 (Kodak), and Monte Carlo-calculated dose profiles. The EPIDose profiles were almost in agreement with Monte Carlo-calculated dose profiles and MapCHECK for test plans. The dose profiles were in good agreement with EDR2 at the penumbra region. For dose distributions, EPIDose, EDR2, and MapCHECK agreed with that of the treatment-planning system at each depth in the gamma analysis. In comparisons of clinical IMRT plans, EPIDose had almost the same accuracy as MapCHECK and EDR2. Because EPIDose has a wide dynamic range and high resolution, it is a useful tool for the complicated IMRT verification. Furthermore, EPIDose can also evaluate the absolute dose.
Radiological Physics and Technology 12/2012;
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In this study, we investigated comprehensive quality assurance (QA) for respiratory-gated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the lungs using a real-time position management system (RPM). By using the phantom study, we evaluated dose liberality and reproducibility, and dose distributions for low monitor unite (MU), and also checked the absorbed dose at isocenter and dose profiles for the respiratory-gated exposure using RPM. Furthermore, we evaluated isocenter dose and dose distributions for respiratory-gated SBRT plans in the lungs using RPM. The maximum errors for the dose liberality were 4% for 2 MU, 1% for 4-10 MU, and 0.5% for 15 MU and 20 MU. The dose reproducibility was 2% for 1 MU and within 0.1% for 5 MU or greater. The accuracy for dose distributions was within 2% for 2 MU or greater. The dose error along a central axis for respiratory cycles of 2, 4, and 6 sec was within 1%. As for geometric accuracy, 90% and 50% isodose areas for the respiratory-gated exposure became almost 1 mm and 2 mm larger than without gating, respectively. For clinical lung-SBRT plans, the point dose at isocenter agreed within 2.1% with treatment planning system (TPS). And the pass rates of all plans for TPS were more than 96% in the gamma analysis (3 mm/3%). The geometrical accuracy and the dose accuracy of TPS calculation algorithm are more important for the dose evaluation at penumbra region for respiratory-gated SBRT in lung using RPM.
Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi 01/2012; 68(11):1519-24.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In this study, we developed a correction method for coordinate transformation errors that are produced in combination with the ExacTrac X-ray system (BrainLAB) and HexaPOD (Elekta) in image guided radiation therapy (IGRT). The positional accuracy of the correction method was compared between the ExacTrac Robotics (BrainLAB) and no correction. We tried to correct iBeam evo couch top (Elekta) by operating two steps drive like ExacTrac Robotics. No correction for HexaPOD showed a maximal error of 4.52 mm, and the couch did not move to the correct position. However, our correction method for HexaPOD showed the positional accuracy within 1 mm. Our method has no significant difference with ExacTrac Robotics (paired t-test, P>0.1). But, when the correction values for the rotatory directions were large, the positional accuracy tended to be poor. The smallest setup errors for the rotatory directions are important for IGRT.
Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi 01/2012; 68(11):1492-8.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The dosimetric properties between various 2D array detectors were compared and were evaluated with regard to the accuracy in absolute dose and dose distributions for clinical treatment fields. We used to check the dose accuracy: 2D array detectors; MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear), EPID (Varian Medical Systems), EPID-based dosimetry (EPIDose, Sun Nuclear), COMPASS (IBA) and conventional system; EDR2 film (Eastman Kodak), Exradin A-14SL ion chamber (0.016 cc, Standard Imaging). First, we compared the dose linearity, dose rate dependence, and output factor between the 2D array detectors. Next, the accuracy of the absolute dose and dose distributions were evaluated for clinical fields. All detector responses for the dose linear were in agreement within 1%, and the dose rate dependence and output factor agreed within a standard deviation of ±1.2%, except for EPID. This is because EPID is fluence distributions. In all the 2D array detectors, the point dose agreed within 5% with treatment planning system (TPS). Pass rates of each detector for TPS were more than 97% in the gamma analysis (3 mm/3%). EPIDose was in a good agreement with TPS. All 2D array detectors used in this study showed almost the same accuracy for clinical fields. EPIDose has better resolution than other 2D array detectors and thus this is expected for dose distributions with a small field.
Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi 01/2012; 68(4):443-52.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Our purpose in this study was to evaluate the fundamental accuracy of reconstructed dose distributions from the COMPASS system using specific MLC test patterns and complicated IMRT neck plans. The COMPASS-reconstructed dose distributions were compared with those measured with EPID, MapCHECK, and EDR2 film and as well as Monte Carlo-calculated dose profiles with use of square-wave chart patterns of 20-, 10-, and 5-mm gaps and step and pyramid patterns. Additionally, the COMPASS dose distributions for clinical IMRT neck plans were tested. The COMPASS dose profiles were almost in agreement with the Monte Carlo-calculated dose profiles and point doses measured with MapCHECK for 20- and 10-mm gap patterns. The dose profile for a 5-mm gap pattern showed a narrow width due to the detector size in the penumbra region. For step and pyramid patterns, COMPASS agreed with MapCHECK and Monte Carlo calculation, except for EDR2 film. The COMPASS and MapCHECK dose distributions agreed with that of a treatment planning system by gamma analysis (criteria; 3 mm/3%). In comparisons of clinical IMRT neck dose distributions, COMPASS was measured with almost the same accuracy as MapCHECK, but slight deviations were found for large IMRT fields. These deviations could be minimized by improvement of the beam model of the COMPASS system. The COMPASS system can be expected to be used for traditional QA methods in clinical routine with the same accuracy as a MapCHECK diode detector.
Radiological Physics and Technology 01/2012; 5(1):63-70.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study investigated the possibility of using cylindrical ionization chambers for percent depth-dose (PDD) measurements in high-energy clinical electron beams.
The cavity correction factor, P(cav), for cylindrical chambers with various diameters was calculated as a function of depth from the surface to R50, in the energy range of 6-18 MeV electrons with the EGSnrc C(++) -based user-code CAVITY. The results were compared with those for IBA NACP-02 and PTW Roos parallel-plate ionization chambers. The effective point of measurement (EPOM) for the cylindrical chamber and the parallel-plate chamber was positioned according to the IAEA TRS-398 code of practice. The overall correction factor, P(Q), and the percent depth-ionization (PDI) curve for a PTW30013 Farmer-type chamber were also compared with those of NACP-02 and Roos chambers.
The P(cav) values at depths between the surface and R50 for cylindrical chambers were all lower than those with parallel-plate chambers. However, the variation in depth for cylindrical chambers equal to or less than 4 mm in diameter was equivalent to or smaller than that for parallel-plate chambers. The P(Q) values for the PTW30013 chamber mainly depended on P(cav), and for parallel-plate chambers depended on the wall correction factor, P(waII), rather than P(cav). P(Q) at depths from the surface to R50 for the PTW30013 chamber was consequently a lower value than that with parallel-plate chambers. However, the variation in depth was equivalent to that of parallel-plate chambers at electron energies equal to or greater than 9 MeV. The shift to match calculated PDI curves for the PTW30013 chamber and water (perturbation free) varied from 0.65 to 0 mm between 6 and 18 MeV beams. Similarly, the shifts for NACP-02 and Roos chambers were 0.5-0.6 mm and 0.2-0.3 mm, respectively, and were nearly independent of electron energy.
Calculated PDI curves for PTW30013, NACP-02, and Roos chambers agreed well with that of water by using the optimal EPOM. Therefore, the possibility of using cylindrical ionization chambers can be expected for PDD measurements in clinical electron beams.
Medical Physics 08/2011; 38(8):4647-54. · 2.83 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We investigated experimentally and clinically the influence of a six degree (6D) carbon fiber couch on conventional radiation therapy. We used 4, 6 and 10 MV X-rays and compared dose distributions based on correction methods, i.e. monitor unit (MU) addition, including computed tomography (CT) couch, and the couch modeling. Additionally, we evaluated the clinical value of dosimetric correction for the 6D couch in 30 patients treated with multi-field irradiation. In the phantom study, the maximum difference of isocenter doses attributable to the 6D couch was 5.1%; the difference was reduced with increasing X-ray energy. Although the isocenter dose based on each correction method was precise within ±1%, MU addition underestimated the surface dose. In the clinical study, the maximum difference of isocenter doses attributable to the 6D couch was 2.7%. The correction methods for the 6D couch provide for highly precise treatment planning. However, the clinical indication of complicated correction methods should be considered for each institution or each patient, because the influence of the 6D couch was reduced with multi-field irradiation.
Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi 01/2011; 67(12):1592-7.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was to evaluate the perturbation correction factors at a reference depth for cylindrical ionization chambers in high-energy electron beams by means of the EGSnrc Monte Carlo user code cavity. The cylindrical chambers used in this study were the Farmer-type of PTW30010, PTW30011, PTW30012, and PTW30013 models. We calculated the wall correction factor, P (wall), the cavity or electron fluence correction factor, P (cav), the stem correction factor, P (stem), the central electrode correction factor, P (cel), and the overall perturbation correction factor, P (Q), for each chamber. The calculated P (cav) values were higher by from 2 to 1% than those recommended by the IAEA-TRS-398 code of practice, in an energy range of 6-18 MeV. The P (wall) values almost agreed with the analytical calculation performed with IAEA-TRS-398. The P (cel) values agreed with those of Ma and Nahum, performed with IAEA-TRS-398. The P (stem) values were approximately 0.995 on average and were independent of the electron beam energy. P (stem) needs to be considered in future dosimetry protocols. The P (Q) values were higher from 1 to 2% than those of IAEA-TRS-398 in an energy range of 6-18 MeV.
Radiological Physics and Technology 07/2010; 3(2):93-7.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In this study, we calculated perturbation correction factors for cylindrical ionization chambers in high-energy photon beams by using Monte Carlo simulations. We modeled four Farmer-type cylindrical chambers with the EGSnrc/Cavity code and calculated the cavity or electron fluence correction factor, P (cav), the displacement correction factor, P (dis), the wall correction factor, P (wall), the stem correction factor, P (stem), the central electrode correction factor, P (cel), and the overall perturbation correction factor, P (Q). The calculated P (dis) values for PTW30010/30013 chambers were 0.9967 +/- 0.0017, 0.9983 +/- 0.0019, and 0.9980 +/- 0.0019, respectively, for (60)Co, 4 MV, and 10 MV photon beams. The value for a (60)Co beam was about 1.0% higher than the 0.988 value recommended by the IAEA TRS-398 protocol. The P (dis) values had a substantial discrepancy compared to those of IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 at all photon energies. The P (wall) values were from 0.9994 +/- 0.0020 to 1.0031 +/- 0.0020 for PTW30010 and from 0.9961 +/- 0.0018 to 0.9991 +/- 0.0017 for PTW30011/30012, in the range of (60)Co-10 MV. The P (wall) values for PTW30011/30012 were around 0.3% lower than those of the IAEA TRS-398. Also, the chamber response with and without a 1 mm PMMA water-proofing sleeve agreed within their combined uncertainty. The calculated P (stem) values ranged from 0.9945 +/- 0.0014 to 0.9965 +/- 0.0014, but they are not considered in current dosimetry protocols. The values were no significant difference on beam qualities. P (cel) for a 1 mm aluminum electrode agreed within 0.3% with that of IAEA TRS-398. The overall perturbation factors agreed within 0.4% with those for IAEA TRS-398.
Radiological Physics and Technology 07/2010; 3(2):159-64.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to compare dose distributions from three different RTPS with those from Monte Carlo (MC) calculations and measurements, in heterogeneous phantoms for photon beams. This study used four algorithms for RTPS: AAA (analytical anisotropic algorithm) implemented in the Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems) treatment planning system, CC (collapsed cone) superposition from the Pinnacle (Philips), and MGS (multigrid superposition) and FFT (fast Fourier transform) convolution from XiO (CMS). The dose distributions from these algorithms were compared with those from MC and measurements in a set of heterogeneous phantoms. Eclipse/AAA underestimated the dose inside the lung region for low energies of 4 and 6 MV. This is because Eclipse/AAA do not adequately account for a scaling of the spread of the pencil (lateral electron transport) based on changes in the electron density at low photon energies. The dose distributions from Pinnacle/CC and XiO/MGS almost agree with those of MC and measurements at low photon energies, but increase errors at high energy of 15 MV, especially for a small field of 3x3 cm(2). The FFT convolution extremely overestimated the dose inside the lung slab compared to MC. The dose distributions from the superposition algorithms almost agree with those from MC as well as measured values at 4 and 6 MV. The dose errors for Eclipse/AAA are lager in lung model phantoms for 4 and 6 MV. It is necessary to use the algorithms comparable to superposition for accuracy of dose calculations in heterogeneous regions.
Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi 04/2010; 66(4):322-33.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to calculate correction factors for plastic water (PW) and plastic water diagnostic-therapy (PWDT) phantoms in clinical photon and electron beam dosimetry using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code system. A water-to-plastic ionization conversion factor k(pl) for PW and PWDT was computed for several commonly used Farmer-type ionization chambers with different wall materials in the range of 4-18 MV photon beams. For electron beams, a depth-scaling factor c(pl) and a chamber-dependent fluence correction factor h(pl) for both phantoms were also calculated in combination with NACP-02 and Roos plane-parallel ionization chambers in the range of 4-18 MeV. The h(pl) values for the plane-parallel chambers were evaluated from the electron fluence correction factor phi(pl)w and wall correction factors P(wall,w) and P(wall,pl) for a combination of water or plastic materials. The calculated k(pl) and h(pl) values were verified by comparison with the measured values. A set of k(pl) values computed for the Farmer-type chambers was equal to unity within 0.5% for PW and PWDT in photon beams. The k(pl) values also agreed within their combined uncertainty with the measured data. For electron beams, the c(pl) values computed for PW and PWDT were from 0.998 to 1.000 and from 0.992 to 0.997, respectively, in the range of 4-18 MeV. The phi(pl)w values for PW and PWDT were from 0.998 to 1.001 and from 1.004 to 1.001, respectively, at a reference depth in the range of 4-18 MeV. The difference in P(wall) between water and plastic materials for the plane-parallel chambers was 0.8% at a maximum. Finally, h(pl) values evaluated for plastic materials were equal to unity within 0.6% for NACP-02 and Roos chambers. The h(pl) values also agreed within their combined uncertainty with the measured data. The absorbed dose to water from ionization chamber measurements in PW and PWDT plastic materials corresponds to that in water within 1%. Both phantoms can thus be used as a substitute for water for photon and electron dosimetry.
Medical Physics 08/2009; 36(7):2992-3001. · 2.83 Impact Factor
-
Fujio Araki
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Recent standard dosimetry protocols recommend that plane-parallel ionization chambers be used in the measurements of depth-dose distributions or the calibration of low-energy electron beams with beam quality R50 <4 g/cm2. In electron dosimetry protocols with the plane-parallel chambers, the wall correction factor, Pwall, in water is assumed to be unity and the replacement correction factor, Prepl, is taken to be unity for well-guarded plane-parallel chambers, at all measurement depths. This study calculated Pwall and Prepl for NACP-02, Markus, and Roos plane-parallel chambers in clinical electron dosimetry using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code system. The Pwall values for the plane-parallel chambers increased rapidly as a function of depth in water, especially at lower energy. The value around R50 for NACP-02 was about 10% greater than unity at 4 MeV. The effect was smaller for higher electron energies. Similarly, Prepl values with depth increased drastically at the region with the steep dose gradient for lower energy. For Markus Prepl departed more than 10% from unity close to R50 due to the narrow guard ring width. Prepl for NACP-02 and Roos was close to unity in the plateau region of depth-dose curves that includes a reference depth, dref. It was also found that the ratio of the dose to water and the dose to the sensitive volume in the air cavity for the plane-parallel chambers, Dw/[Dair]pp, at d(ref) differs significantly from that assumed by electron dosimetry protocols.
Medical Physics 09/2008; 35(9):4033-40. · 2.83 Impact Factor
-
Fujio Araki
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In some recent dosimetry protocols, plastic is allowed as a phantom material for the determination of an absorbed dose to water in electron beams, especially for low energy with beam qualities R50 < 4 g/cm2. In electron dosimetry with plastic, a depth-scaling factor, cpl, and a chamber-dependent fluence correction factor, h(pl), are needed to convert the dose measured at a water-equivalent reference depth in plastic to a dose at a reference depth in water. The purpose of this study is to calculate correction factors for the use of plastic phantoms for clinical electron dosimetry using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code system. RMI-457 and WE-211 were investigated as phantom materials. First the c(pl) values for plastic materials were calculated as a function of a half-value depth of maximum ionization, I50, in plastic. The c(pl) values for RMI-457 and WE-211 varied from 0.992 to 1.002 and from 0.971 to 0.979, respectively, in a range of nominal energies from 4 MeV to 18 MeV, and varied slightly as a function of I50 in plastic. Since h(pl) values depend on the wall correction factor, P(wall), of the chamber used, they are evaluated using a pure electron fluence correction factor, phi(pl)w, and P(wall)w and P(wall)pl, for a combination of water or plastic phantoms and plane-parallel ionization chambers (NACP-02, Markus and Roos). The phi(pl)w and P(wall) (P(wall)w and P(wall)pl) values were calculated as a function of the water-equivalent depth in plastic materials and at a reference depth as a function of R50 in water, respectively. The phi(pl)w values varied from 1.024 at 4 MeV to 1.013 at 18 MeV for RMI-457, and from 1.025 to 1.016 for WE-211. P(wall)w values for plane-parallel chambers showed values in the order of 1.5% to 2% larger than unity at 4 MeV, consistent with earlier results. The P(wall)pl values of RMI-457 and WE-211 were close to unity for all the energy beams. Finally, calculated h(pl) values of RMI-457 ranged from 1.009 to 1.005, from 1.010 to 1.003 and from 1.011 to 1.007 for NACP-02, Markus and Roos chambers, respectively, in the range of 4 MeV to 18 MeV, and the values of WE-211 were 1.010 to 1.004, 1.010 to 1.004 and 1.012 to 1.008, respectively. The calculated h(pl), values for the Markus chamber agreed within their combined uncertainty with the measured data.
Medical Physics 12/2007; 34(11):4368-77. · 2.83 Impact Factor
-
Fujio Araki
Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi 11/2006; 62(10):1399-1410.
-
Fujio Araki
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study investigated small-field dosimetry for a Cyberknife stereotactic radiosurgery system using Monte Carlo simulations. The EGSnrc/BEAMnrc Monte Carlo code was used to simulate the Cyberknife treatment head, and the DOSXYZnrc code was implemented to calculate central axis depth-dose curves, off-axis dose profiles, and relative output factors for various circular collimator sizes of 5 to 60 mm. Water-to-air stopping power ratios necessary for clinical reference dosimetry of the Cyberknife system were also evaluated by Monte Carlo simulations. Additionally, a beam quality conversion factor, kQ, for the Cyberknife system was evaluated for cylindrical ion chambers with different wall material. The accuracy of the simulated beam was validated by agreement within 2% between the Monte Carlo calculated and measured central axis depth-dose curves and off-axis dose profiles. The calculated output factors were compared with those measured by a diode detector and an ion chamber in water. The diode output factors agreed within 1% with the calculated values down to a 10 mm collimator. The output factors with the ion chamber decreased rapidly for collimators below 20 mm. These results were confirmed by the comparison to those from Monte Carlo methods with voxel sizes and materials corresponding to both detectors. It was demonstrated that the discrepancy in the 5 and 7.5 mm collimators for the diode detector is due to the water non-equivalence of the silicon material, and the dose fall-off for the ion chamber is due to its large active volume against collimators below 20 mm. The calculated stopping power ratios of the 60 mm collimator from the Cyberknife system (without a flattening filter) agreed within 0.2% with those of a 10 X 10 cm2 field from a conventional linear accelerator with a heavy flattening filter and the incident electron energy, 6 MeV. The difference in the stopping power ratios between 5 and 60 mm collimators was within 0.5% at a 10 cm depth in water. Furthermore, kQ values for the Cyberknife system were in agreement within 0.3% with those of the conventional 6 MV-linear accelerator for the cylindrical ion chambers with different wall material.
Medical Physics 09/2006; 33(8):2955-63. · 2.83 Impact Factor
-
Fujio Araki
Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi 11/2005; 61(10):1365-72.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A radiophotoluminescent (RPL) glass rod dosimeter (GRD) and a small active volume p-type silicon diode detector are used for the measurement of the helmet output factors from five Gamma-Knife units, which include four Model B units and a Model C unit. The output factors for the five units measured with the GRD from 14, 8 and 4 mm helmets relative to the 18 mm helmet are 0.984 +/- 0.003, 0.951 +/- 0.003 and 0.884 +/- 0.006, respectively. Similarly, the corresponding output factors measured with the p-type silicon diode detector are 0.983 +/- 0.002, 0.952 +/- 0.003 and 0.867 +/- 0.015, respectively. The output factors are corrected with the end effect for each helmet of the five units. The end effect time for the four Model B units ranges from 4 sec for the 18 mm helmet to 2 sec for the 4 mm helmet. The results for the Model C unit are within 1 sec for all the helmets. The output factors for the five units obtained from both detectors are in good agreement with the values in a recent publication and the values recommended by Elekta, the device manufacturer, except for that of the 4 mm helmet measured with the GRD. The average GRD output factor for the 4 mm helmet is 1.6% higher than Elekta's value, 0.870, but is in good agreement with the published value which was measured using small active volume detectors. The helmet output factors for the five Gamma-Knife units measured with the GRD agree within measurement deviation.
Igaku butsuri: Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics: an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics 02/2005; 25(1):24-31.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Japan Society of Medical Physics (JSMP) Task Group published Standard dosimetry of absorbed dose in external beam radiotherapy (Standard dosimetry 01) as a new high-energy photon and electron dosimetry protocol in 2002. In this study, we present Standard dosimetry 01 as the JSMP-01 protocol for the convenience of users. This protocol is based on using an ion chamber having a (60)Co absorbed dose to water calibration coefficient, N(D,w), which is calculated from a (60)Co exposure calibration coefficient, N(c). We present dose comparisons between a reference chamber and various Farmer-type cylindrical chambers with different wall materials. The absorbed dose to water was compared at the calibration depths of 5 cm for a (60)Co beam, 10 cm for photons, and d(c) = 0.6 R(50) - 0.1 (cm) for electrons according to JSMP-01. The JARP chamber in the Kyushu Regional Center which meets third-order standards in Japan was used as the reference chamber. The absorbed dose to water for the Farmer-type chambers determined according to JSMP-01 agreed with that for the JARP chamber within 1% for photon and electron beams. The doses obtained by JSMP-01 and the Japan Association of Radiological Physics protocol (JARP-86) were also compared for photon and electron beams. For the Farmer-type chambers with photon beams, JSMP-01 results were up to 1.5% higher than JARP-86 results. For electron beams JSMP-01 results were higher than JARP-86 results by 1.3-2.8%.
Igaku butsuri: Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics: an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics 02/2005; 25(3):104-13.
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The Japan Society of Medical Physics (JSMP) Task Group published Standard dosimetry of absorbed dose in external beam radiotherapy (Standard dosimetry 01) as a new high-energy photon and electron dosimetry protocol in 2002. In this study, we present Standard dosimetry 01 as the JSMP-01 protocol for the convenience of users. This protocol is based on using an ion chamber having a (60)Co absorbed dose to water calibration coefficient, N(D,w), which is calculated from a (60)Co exposure calibration coefficient, N(c). We present dose comparisons between a reference chamber and various plane-parallel chambers. The absorbed dose to water was compared at the calibration depth of 5 cm for a (60)Co beam and d(c) = 0.6R(50) - 0.1 (cm) for electron beams according to JSMP-01. The absorbed dose to water calibration coefficients, [N(D,w)](Co) and [N(D,w)](18E), for the plane-parallel chambers were also determined by (60)Co and electron beam cross-calibrations using a reference chamber. The dose for the plane-parallel chambers derived from [N(D,w)](Co) and [N(D,w)](18E) was compared to that for the reference chamber using electron beams. The JARP chamber in the Kyushu Regional Center which meets third-order standards in Japan was used as the reference chamber. The doses for the plane-parallel chambers determined according to JSMP-01 agreed with that for the JARP chamber within 1% and 2% for (60)Co and electron beams, respectively. For electron beams, the doses for the plane-parallel chambers calculated from [N(D,w)](Co) and [N(D,w)](18E) were within 1.5% and 1.0% compared to those for the JARP chamber, respectively, except for the Exradin A10 chamber.
Igaku butsuri: Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics: an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics 02/2005; 25(3):114-23.
-
Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi 08/2004; 60(7):939-47.
