Publications (2)19.39 Total impact
-
Article: Chronic heart failure in the very elderly: clinical status, survival, and prognostic factors in 188 patients more than 70 years old.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a frequent disease with a dismal prognosis, but little is known about survival in the very elderly. There are no data on the prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in this population. We aimed to assess exercise capacity, survival, and prognostic parameters in elderly patients with CHF. We evaluated 188 patients with CHF >70 years old (mean 77 +/- 4 years, range 70-94 years) seen at our heart failure clinic between March 1992 and June 1998. A cardiopulmonary exercise test was performed in 102 patients (peak VO2 15.3 +/- 4.7, VE/VCO2 slope 39.6 +/- 15.01). All patients were followed up for at least 12 months. The prognostic end point of the study was all-cause mortality. At the end of follow-up (16 +/- 10 mo, range 12-41 mo), 67 patients (35.6%) had died (1-year mortality rate 26% [95% confidence interval 20-32]). In univariate analysis New York Heart Association class (NYHA) (relative risk [RR] = 2.56, P <.0001), VE/VCO2 (RR = 1.041, P <.0001), peak VO2 (RR = 0.87, P =.0007), and fractional shortening (RR = 0.95, P <.0001) predicted mortality. Peak VO2 predicted mortality independently of age, NYHA class, and left ventricular ejection fraction. A subgroup of 12 patients with dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction during stress had an excellent outcome, with a 100% survival at the end of follow-up (mean 16 +/- 7 mo, range 12-39 mo). The prognosis in elderly patients with CHF is poor. Valid exercise testing results can be obtained in more than 50% of elderly patients with CHF. NYHA class and peak VO2 are the strongest prognostic factors in this population.American Heart Journal 07/2001; 142(1):174-80. · 4.65 Impact Factor -
Article: Enhanced ventilatory response to exercise in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved exercise tolerance: marker of abnormal cardiorespiratory reflex control and predictor of poor prognosis.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and preserved exercise tolerance, the value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for risk stratification is not known. Elevated slope of ventilatory response to exercise (VE/VCO(2)) predicts poor prognosis in advanced CHF. Derangement of cardiopulmonary reflexes may trigger exercise hyperpnea. We assessed the relationship between cardiopulmonary reflexes and VE/VCO(2)and investigated the prognostic value of (VE/VCO(2)) in CHF patients with preserved exercise tolerance. Among 344 consecutive CHF patients, we identified 123 with preserved exercise capacity, defined as a peak oxygen consumption (PEAK VO(2)) >/=18 mL. kg(-1). min(-1) (age 56 years; left ventricular ejection fraction 28%; peak VO(2) 23.5 mL. kg(-1). min(-1)). Hypoxic and hypercapnic chemosensitivity (n=38), heart rate variability (n=34), baroreflex sensitivity (n=20), and ergoreflex activity (n=20) were also assessed. We identified 40 patients (33%) with high VE/VCO(2) (ie, >34.0). During follow-up (49+/-22 months, >3 years in all survivors), 34 patients died (3-year survival 81%). High VE/VCO(2) (hazard ratio 4.3, P<0.0001) but not peak f1.gif" BORDER="0">O(2) (P=0.7) predicted mortality. In patients with high VE/VCO(2), 3-year survival was 57%, compared with 93% in patients with normal VE/VCO(2) P<0.0001). Patients with high VE/VCO(2) demonstrated impaired reflex control, as evidenced by augmented peripheral (P=0.01) and central (P=0.0006) chemosensitivity, depressed low-frequency component of heart rate variability (P<0.0001) and baroreflex sensitivity (P=0.03), and overactive ergoreceptors (P=0.003) compared with patients with normal VE/VCO(2). In CHF patients with preserved exercise capacity, enhanced ventilatory response to exercise is a simple marker of a widespread derangement of cardiovascular reflex control; it predicts poor prognosis, which VO(2) does not.Circulation 03/2001; 103(7):967-72. · 14.74 Impact Factor
