H Sohmer

Hadassah Medical Center, Yerushalayim, Jerusalem District, Israel

Are you H Sohmer?

Claim your profile

Publications (223)240.09 Total impact

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Soft tissue conduction (STC) is a recently expounded mode of auditory stimulation in which the clinical bone vibrator delivers auditory frequency vibratory stimuli to skin sites on the head, neck, and thorax. Investigation of the mechanism of STC stimulation has served as a platform for the elucidation of the mechanics of cochlear activation, in general, and to a better understanding of several perplexing auditory phenomena. This review demonstrates that it is likely that the cochlear hair cells can be directly activated at low sound intensities by the fluid pressures initiated in the cochlea; that the fetus in utero, completely enveloped in amniotic fluid, hears by STC; that a speaker hears his/her own voice by air conduction and by STC; and that pulsatile tinnitus is likely due to pulsatile turbulent blood flow producing fluid pressures that reach the cochlea through the soft tissues.
    Journal of basic and clinical physiology and pharmacology 09/2014; 25(3):269-72.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Background: Active middle ear implants such as the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) have been placed on the round window (RW) in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss, with satisfactory hearing results. Several observations show that the mechanism of RW stimulation is not completely understood. The purpose of the present study was to compare different coupling procedures between the transducer and the RW in order to contribute to an understanding of the mechanism of RW stimulation. Methods: Five fat sand rats underwent ablation of the left ear and opening of the right bulla, followed by baseline measurements of thresholds of auditory nerve brainstem evoked responses (ABR) to air and bone conduction click stimuli. Subsequently the malleus and incus were removed from the right middle ear, modeling a conductive hearing loss in which the VSB on the RW is indicated. In the next stage of the experiment, a rod attached to the bone vibrator was placed gently on the RW membrane and then on saline fluid applied to the RW niche. ABR thresholds were recorded following both placements. Results: Mean baseline ABR threshold in response to air conduction stimuli was 48±4 dB; mean ABR threshold when the rod was placed on the dry RW membrane was 99±12 dB; mean ABR threshold when the rod was in the saline on RW niche was 79±7 dB. Conclusions: ABR thresholds were better (lower) with stimulation of fluid on the RW membrane compared to direct stimulation of the RW, providing further evidence of a direct fluid pathway.
    Journal of basic and clinical physiology and pharmacology 07/2014;
  • Haim Sohmer
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Air conduction (AC) is accompanied by displacements of the two cochlear windows, bulk fluid flow between them, a pressure difference across the basilar membrane, leading to a passive traveling wave along the membrane, which activates the cochlear amplifier and enhances the displacements. AC interacts with bone conduction (BC) stimulation, so that it has been assumed that BC stimulation also involves a passive traveling wave. However, several clinical conditions and experimental manipulations provide evidence that a passive traveling wave may not be involved in BC stimulation at low intensities. Soft tissue conduction (STC) (also called non-osseous bone conduction) involves applying the bone vibrator to soft tissues on the head, neck and thorax, eliciting auditory sensation. STC stimulation probably does not involve a passive traveling wave. This review presents clinical conditions and experimental manipulations which assess the contributions of AC, BC and STC stimulation to the passive traveling wave. Evidence from the clinic (otosclerosis, round window atresia) and from the laboratory (holes in the wall of the inner ear, immobilization of the ossicular chain and the windows, discontinuity of the chain, measurement of basilar membrane displacements in the absence of the cochlear amplifier) lead to the conclusion that a passive basilar membrane traveling wave may not be involved in stimulation at low sound intensities. It is suggested that at low sound levels, the outer hair cell cochlear amplifier may not be activated by a passive traveling wave, but may be directly activated by the fast cochlear fluid pressures induced by AC, BC and STC stimulation. On the other hand, at high intensities, the cochlea is activated by the slow passive traveling wave.
    Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 04/2014; · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clinical conditions have been described in which one of the two cochlear windows is immobile (otosclerosis) or absent (round window atresia), but nevertheless bone conduction (BC) thresholds are relatively unaffected. To clarify this apparent paradox, experimental manipulations which would severely impede several of the classical osseous mechanisms of BC were induced in fat sand rats, including discontinuity or immobilization of the ossicular chain, coupled with window fixation. Effects of these manipulations were assessed by recording auditory nerve brainstem evoked response (ABR) thresholds to stimulation by air conduction (AC), by osseous BC and by non-osseous BC (also called soft tissue conduction-STC) in which the BC bone vibrator is applied to skin sites. Following the immobilization, discontinuity and window fixation, auditory stimulation was also delivered to cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) and to saline applied to the middle ear cavity. While the manipulations (immobilization, discontinuity, window fixation) led to an elevation of AC thresholds, nevertheless, there was no change in osseous and non-osseous BC thresholds. On the other hand, ABR could be elicited in response to fluid pressure stimulation to CSF and middle ear saline, even in the presence of the severe restriction of ossicular chain and window mobility. The results of these experiments in which osseous and non-osseous BC thresholds remained unchanged in the presence of severe restriction of the classical middle ear mechanisms and in the absence of an efficient release window, while ABR could be recorded in response to fluid pressure auditory stimulation to fluid sites, indicate that it is possible that the inner ear may be activated at low sound intensities by fast fluid pressure stimulation. At higher sound intensities, a slower passive basilar membrane traveling wave may serve to excite the inner ear.
    Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 01/2014; · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • Cahtia Adelman, Haim Sohmer, Ronen Perez
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Background: Soft tissue conduction (STC) is a recently described mode of auditory stimulation in which vibrations induced by a clinical bone vibrator applied to soft tissue sites on the head, neck, and thorax of human subjects reach the cochlea and elicit auditory sensation. In humans, STC stimulation interacts with air conduction stimulation and with bone conduction (BC) stimulation in several ways, e.g., mutual masking. Methods: This study investigated whether mutual masking between STC and BC stimulation can be demonstrated in an experimental animal. In fat sand rats, auditory nerve and brainstem evoked response to BC stimulation was recorded in the presence of noise masking presented by STC and vice versa. Results: STC successfully masked BC, and BC also masked STC responses. Conclusions: Mutual masking, now demonstrated in animals, paves the way for animal experiments to clarify the pathway between the STC stimulation sites and the cochlea.
    Journal of basic and clinical physiology and pharmacology. 08/2013;
  • Cahtia Adelman, Ronen Perez, Haim Sohmer
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Auditory sensation can be elicited by applying a bone conduction vibrator to skin sites on the head, neck, and thorax over soft tissues. This is called soft tissue conduction (STC). We hypothesized that introducing substances with acoustic impedances that sharply deviate from those of soft tissues, such as air pockets, into the soft tissues beneath soft tissue stimulation sites would have an effect on the auditory threshold to stimulation at skin sites over soft tissue. In human subjects, we assessed the auditory threshold with a bone vibrator applied to several STC sites, especially the cheek, and to several bone conduction sites on the skull. The subjects were equipped with bilateral earplugs. The subject then filled his or her cheek with either air or water, and the auditory threshold was again determined. We also recorded the auditory brain stem response to STC stimulation under the chin in fat sand rats in the absence and presence of subcutaneous air or saline solution pockets (0.4 mL) under the chin. In humans, the threshold to stimulation on the cheek was elevated (13 to 18 dB) in the presence of an air-inflated cheek, but not with a water-filled cheek. In animals, in the presence of an air pocket, the auditory brain stem response threshold was elevated by 10 to 20 dB; no threshold change occurred with a saline solution pocket. The introduction of air (but not water) into the soft tissues beneath the soft tissue stimulation sites led to a threshold elevation in both humans and animals. This was not the case when an identical volume of water was introduced, which would also have interrupted a possible parallel bone conduction pathway. These results provide evidence that soft tissue stimulation at low intensities induces tissue vibrations that are transmitted to the cochlea along a series of soft tissues with similar acoustic impedances.
    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology 08/2013; 122(8):524-8. · 1.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Background: Soft tissue conduction (STC), a recently described mode of auditory stimulation elicited when the clinical bone vibrator is applied to skin sites over the head, neck, and thorax, complements air conduction (AC) and bone conduction (BC), elicited by the same vibrator. The study assessed skull bone vibrations induced during STC and BC stimulation. Methods: The experiments were conducted on fat sand rats. Thresholds of auditory nerve brainstem evoked responses (ABRs) were recorded and compared to the lowest-intensity sound stimuli that elicited vibrations at the bony vestibule of the inner ear detected by a laser Doppler vibrometer. Results: Vibrations were detected during BC but not during STC stimulation. ABR was recorded to both STC and to BC stimulation. Conclusions: Low-intensity STC stimulation does not induce vibrations of the inner ear, showing that STC apparently does not involve mechanisms based on vibrations of bone.
    Journal of basic and clinical physiology and pharmacology. 07/2013;
  • Cahtia Adelman, Haim Sohmer
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was designed to compare the thresholds to a standard clinical bone vibrator applied to sites on the head over skull bone (bone conduction, BC) and to soft tissue sites on the head and neck (soft tissue conduction, STC) with static application forces of 100 and 500 g in order to assess the possibility that STC is actually a form of BC, since both are elicited by stimulation with the same bone vibrator. Thresholds to 2.0-kHz tones were assessed in dB hearing level settings of the audiometer in the BC stimulation mode. There was no difference in threshold between forces of 100 and 500 g when applied to the skull bone sites (e.g. mastoid, forehead). However, at soft tissue sites (e.g. below the ear lobe, under the chin, on the sterno-cleido-mastoid muscle), thresholds to 100 g were significantly higher (poorer) than those to 500 g. With the 500 g static force (and also with the 100 g force), the thresholds at the STC sites were higher (poorer) than those at the skull bone sites. These findings have implications for understanding BC and STC modes of auditory activation.
    Audiology and Neurotology 10/2012; 18(1):31-35. · 2.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To assess and compare the effect of commonly used topical antimycotic agents and their solvents on the function of the vestibular and cochlear parts of the sand rat's inner ear. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, animal study. METHODS: Forty-five fat sand rats were randomly assigned to five major groups, each receiving topical application of a different agent: saline (control), gentamicin (ototoxic control), and three antimycotic agents: nystatin, clotrimazole solution (Agisten), and bifonazole solution (Agispor). All animals underwent a right labyrinthectomy, and a polyethylene tube was inserted into the left middle ear followed by baseline recording of vestibular evoked potentials (VsEPs) and auditory nerve and brainstem responses (ABR). Subsequently, each animal received five consecutive daily applications of the specific agent into the left middle ear. Evoked potential recordings were repeated 3 and 10 days after the last application and compared to baseline. For clotrimazole and bifonazole solutions, the effect of the solvents was assessed by comparing ABR recordings at similar intervals. RESULTS: Administration of saline did not affect VsEPs or ABR. Both could not be recorded following gentamicin application. In all three antimycotic agents, no statistically significant difference was found between VsEPs recordings before and after application. Clotrimazole and bifonazole solutions caused a significant ABR threshold elevation similar to that caused by their solvents. Nystatin caused a less significant ABR threshold elevation. CONCLUSIONS: The three commonly used topical antimycotic agents investigated here did not affect vestibular function but had a toxic effect on inner ear cochlear function. It seems the main offenders were the solvents.
    The Laryngoscope 09/2012; · 1.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Auditory sensation can be elicited by air conduction (AC) and by bone conduction (BC). It is also possible to elicit such responses by applying the standard clinical bone vibrator to the skin over soft tissue sites on the head, neck, or thorax of humans and animals. This mode of auditory stimulation has been called soft tissue conduction (STC). This study was designed to investigate the pathway between soft tissue sites and the ear. The air in the middle ear was replaced with saline solution in an animal with unique anatomy--the fat sand rat, in which about 70% of a thin-walled inner ear bulges into the middle ear bulla cavity--while we recorded the auditory brain stem responses (ABRs) to AC, BC, and STC stimulation. This replacement of air with saline solution led to a significant improvement in STC threshold. With AC stimulation, the ABR threshold was elevated and the latency of the first ABR wave was prolonged. Consistent changes were not seen with BC stimulation. When the air (which has a very low acoustic impedance) that normally surrounds most of the inner ear is replaced with saline solution (which has an acoustic impedance similar to that of soft tissues), the STC threshold is improved. This improvement may be due to improved transmission of acoustic energy from the soft tissues to the inner ear.
    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology 09/2012; 121(9):625-8. · 1.21 Impact Factor
  • Haim Sohmer
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The hair cells are the receptor cells of the inner ear. There is still controversy concerning the mechanism of their activation. Studies on the hair cells of the bullfrog sacculus have provided much information on the activity of hair cells. However, the mammalian cochlea has two different types of hair cells - the inner hair cells (IHCs) and the outer hair cells (OHCs) - and it is likely that their activation mechanisms are not identical. Mechanical manipulations of the cochlea and measurements of the passive and active displacements of the basilar membrane in the normal and postmortem cochleas provide evidence that the OHCs are activated directly by the fluid pressures induced in the cochlea by low-level sound, and not indirectly by a passive traveling wave. The activated OHCs produce active displacements (the cochlear amplifier) which excite the IHCs, probably by deflecting their stereocilia, followed by excitation of the auditory nerve fibers.
    Journal of basic and clinical physiology and pharmacology 01/2012; 23(1):1-3.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Auditory sensation can be elicited not only by air conducted (AC) sound or bone conducted (BC) sound, but also by stimulation of soft tissue (STC) sites on the head and neck relatively distant from deeply underlying bone. Tone stimulation by paired combinations of AC with BC (mastoid) and/or with soft tissue conduction produce the same pitch sensation, mutual masking and beats. The present study was designed to determine whether they can also cancel each other. The study was conducted on ten normal hearing subjects. Tones at 2 kHz were presented in paired combinations by AC (insert earphone), by BC (bone vibrator) at the mastoid, and by the same bone vibrator to several STC sites; e.g. the neck, the sterno-cleido-mastoid muscle, the eye, and under the chin, shifting the phases between the pairs. Subjects reported changes in loudness and cancellation. The phase for cancellation differed across subjects. Neck muscle manipulations (changes in head position) led to alterations in the phase at which cancellation was reported. Cancellation was also achieved between pairs of tones to two STC sites. The differing phases for cancellation across subjects and the change in phase accompanying different head positions may be due to the different acoustic impedances of the several tissues in the head and neck. A major component of auditory stimulation by STC may not induce actual skull bone vibrations and may not involve bulk fluid volume displacements.
    Hearing research 01/2012; 283(1-2):180-4. · 2.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A major cause of the hearing loss following exposure to intense noise involves release of free radicals resulting from the elevated metabolism. The free radicals induce damage to several of the components of the cochlear amplifier including the outer hair cells and indirectly to the transduction currents. Salicylic acid induces a reversible hearing loss since it binds to the motor protein prestin in the outer hair cells, reducing electromotility. Furosemide also induces a reversible hearing loss since it reduces the endocochlear potential which is a major component of the cochlear transduction currents. On the other hand, each of these drugs also provides protection from a noise induced hearing loss if they are injected just before a noise exposure, probably as a result of the decreased metabolism induced in their presence, with release of lower levels of free radicals. In this study, both drugs were administered in order to assess whether their protective effects would be additive. The study was conducted on normal hearing albino mice of the Sabra strain. They were injected with either salicylic acid alone (N = 11), or furosemide alone (N = 14), or both together (N = 14), or with saline control (N = 11) and exposed to broad band noise for 3.5 hours. An additional group of 9 mice was injected with both salicylic acid and furosemide, but not exposed to noise. The degree of the resulting hearing loss was assessed by recording thresholds of the auditory nerve brainstem evoked responses to broad band clicks before the injections and noise, and 7, 14 and 21 days after. The noise induced hearing loss in the mice injected with salicylic acid alone or furosemide alone was smaller than in those injected with saline, i.e. these drugs provided protection, as in previous studies in this laboratory. There was no threshold elevation after two weeks in the mice injected with both drugs without noise exposure, i.e. the effects of the two drugs given together was reversible. On the other hand, there was a significant hearing loss (i.e. threshold elevation) in the group which received both drugs and was also exposed to noise, with mean threshold elevations of 38.8 ± 19.0 dB and 28.3 ± 11.7 dB 7 days after noise exposure. This result is very surprising, if not paradoxical. Drugs which provide protection from a noise induced hearing loss when administered alone, not only do not provide protection when given together, but also induce a greater hearing loss when accompanied by noise. This observation may be related to the finding that the depression of the endocochlear potential normally caused by furosemide is reduced in the presence of salicylic acid, so that the protection usually provided by furosemide is not present when it is administered together with salicylic acid. Thus it seems that each drug may interfere with the protective action of the other when coupled with noise.
    Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 01/2012; 7(1):1.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Exposure to continuous and impulse noise can induce a hearing loss. Leupeptin is an inhibitor of the calpains, a family of calcium-activated proteases which promote cell death. The objective of this study is to assess whether Leupeptin could reduce the hearing loss resulting from rifle impulse noise. A polyethelene tube was implanted into middle ear cavities of eight fat sand rats (16 ears). Following determination of auditory nerve brainstem evoked response (ABR) threshold in each ear, the animals were exposed to the noise of 10 M16 rifle shots. Immediately after the exposure, saline was then applied to one (control) ear and non-toxic concentrations of leupeptin determined in the first phase of the study were applied to the other ear, for four consecutive days. Eight days after the exposure, the threshold shift (ABR) in the control ears was significantly greater (44 dB) than in the leupeptin ears (27 dB). Leupeptin applied to the middle ear cavity can reduce the hearing loss resulting from exposure to impulse noise.
    Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 12/2011; 6:38.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since air-conducted (AC) and clinical (mastoid) bone-conducted (BC) sounds interact in the cochlea (e.g. pitch, cancellation, masking, beats), it has been thought that both AC and BC stimulations lead to a mechanical wave in the cochlea. However, there are also "non-osseous" forms of BC, i.e. auditory sensation produced when the clinical bone vibrator is applied to "non-osseous" soft tissue sites. In the present study, such "non-osseous" sites were identified (e.g. eye, cheek, neck) and they interacted with AC and osseous BC (pitch matching, beats, masking), indicating that all of these forms of auditory stimulation converge in the cochlea, producing the same pattern of mechanical activity, leading to their interactions.
    Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 06/2011; 269(2):425-9. · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • Ronen Perez, Cahtia Adelman, Haim Sohmer
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Classically it has been thought that bone conduction activation at the mastoid leads to relative motion between the stapes footplate and the oval window due to inertial and to compression (distortion) mechanisms. However, several recent clinical findings and experimental manipulations may point to additional mechanisms. These manipulations were extended in the present study. In ten fat sand rats, following obliteration of one ear, auditory nerve brainstem evoked response (ABR) thresholds were recorded in response to broad band click stimuli, either air conducted (AC) through insert earphones or bone conducted (BC) delivered directly to the exposed skull bone. Following this, the entire ossicular chain, stapes footplate and round window were completely immobilized with super glue, leading to a mean AC threshold elevation of 44 dB, but to a mean BC threshold change (elevation) of only 3.5 dB. In this state of complete immobilization, the bone vibrator was applied to a pool of saline in the surgical area and ABR was elicited with a mean threshold which was not significantly different from that of the BC threshold. When the bone vibrator was then applied to the eye without touching the bone at the orbit, the resulting ABR threshold was about 20 dB greater than the BC threshold. In conclusion, BC stimulation can activate the cochlea without two mobile windows. Furthermore, the cochlea can be activated by a fluid pathway and by application of a bone vibrator to non-osseous sites (soft tissue conduction).
    Hearing research 05/2011; 280(1-2):82-5. · 2.85 Impact Factor
  • Ronen Perez, Cahtia Adelman, Haim Sohmer
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: According to classic theories, auditory stimulation, whether air- or bone-conducted, has been thought to begin with sound-induced relative motion between the cochlear shell and the stapes footplate, producing a passive mechanical traveling wave along the basilar membrane. This study was designed to assess the effect of experimental mechanical manipulations of the cochlea on the auditory thresholds to air-conducted and bone-conducted stimulation. The left ear of Psammomys obesus (highest auditory sensitivity between 0.5 and 5.0 kHz) was initially ablated in all animals studied. After baseline recording of auditory nerve-brain stem evoked response (ABR) thresholds to air- and bone-conducted broadband click stimulation from the right ear, a hole was drilled in the vestibule of that ear in 3 animals. In 2 other animals, the round window of the animals was immobilized. In 3 additional animals, the round window was widely perforated. Repeat ABR thresholds were then determined. There was no change in ABR thresholds to both air- and bone-conducted stimulation following these manipulations. The ABR wave latency also did not change. It is likely that an alternative mode of cochlear excitation is possible.
    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology 01/2011; 120(1):66-70. · 1.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A new mode of auditory stimulation has been demonstrated which is through soft tissue conduction (STC). It involves evoking auditory sensations by applying the clinical bone vibrator to the skin over soft tissue (not over bone) sites on the head and neck. This study was designed to show that stimulation by STC excites the cochlea in a way similar to that of air conduction (AC) and bone conduction (BC). It is shown here that auditory nerve brainstem evoked response (ABR) thresholds in mice and in the fat sand rat to AC, to BC and to STC stimulation are all elevated following administration of drugs (salicylic acid and furosemide) which depress the cochlear amplifier. In addition, the present study brings evidence that STC stimulation is not a variant of BC since the sound pressures recorded in the occluded external auditory canal (the occlusion effect) in response to STC are significantly smaller than that to BC stimulation, though both are of equal loudness. This new mode, STC, therefore appears to bypass the middle ear mechanisms and consequently may contribute to auditory diagnosis.
    Journal of basic and clinical physiology and pharmacology 01/2011; 22(3):55-8.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The permanent hearing loss following exposure to intense noise can be due either to mechanical structural damage (tearing) caused directly by the noise or to metabolic (biochemical) damage resulting from the elevated levels of free radicals released during transduction of the sound overstimulation. Drugs which depress active cochlear mechanics (e.g. furosemide and salicylic acid) or anti-oxidants (which counteract the free radicals) are effective in reducing the threshold shift (TS) following broadband continuous noise. This study was designed to determine whether furosemide can reduce the TS following exposure to impulse noise, similar to its action with continuous broadband noise. Shortly after furosemide injection, mice were exposed to simulated M16 rifle impulse noise produced by different loudspeakers and amplifiers in different exposure settings and, in other experiments, also to actual M16 rifle shots. Depending on the paradigm, the simulated noises either did not produce a TS, or the TS was reduced by furosemide. The drug was not effective in reducing TS resulting from actual impulse noise. Simulated M16 rifle impulse noise may not truly replicate the rapid rise time and very high intensity of actual rifle shots so that the TS following exposure to such noise can be reduced by these drugs. On the other hand, actual M16 impulse noise probably causes direct (frank) mechanical damage, which is not reduced by these drugs.
    Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology 01/2011; 6(1):14.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We assessed the effect of furosemide administration on noise-induced hearing loss. This drug reversibly elevates the auditory threshold by inducing a temporary reduction of the endocochlear potential and thereby suppresses the cochlear amplifier and active cochlear mechanics. Mice were given a single injection of furosemide 30 minutes before exposure to 113 dB sound pressure level broadband noise. Control animals received saline solution. Furosemide was administered in other mice after the noise exposure. Auditory threshold shifts were assessed by recording auditory nerve brain stem evoked response (ABR) thresholds to broadband clicks. The mean ABR threshold in the group injected with furosemide and exposed to temporary threshold shift (TTS)-producing noise was elevated by 20.4 +/- 12.3 dB, and that in the saline control group was elevated by 35.4 +/- 18.3 dB (p < 0.02). The mean threshold elevations in the group injected with furosemide and exposed to permanent threshold shift (PTS)-producing noise and in the PTS saline control group were 15.0 +/- 10.3 dB and 27.0 +/- 12.7 dB, respectively (p < 0.01). Similar results were obtained when the PTS was assessed with an 8-kHz tone burst ABR. There was no significant difference in the PTS between mice given a single injection of furosemide and those given saline solution after the noise; this finding shows that furosemide is not acting as an antioxidant. It appears that reversible hearing threshold elevation as a result of furosemide administration before noise exposure can reduce the TTS and PTS. This finding provides insight into the mechanism of noise-induced hearing loss.
    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology 05/2010; 119(5):342-9. · 1.21 Impact Factor

Publication Stats

2k Citations
240.09 Total Impact Points

Institutions

  • 1964–2013
    • Hadassah Medical Center
      • • Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
      • • Department of Physiology
      • • Department of Maxillofacial Rehabilitation
      Yerushalayim, Jerusalem District, Israel
  • 2011–2012
    • Hadassah Academic College
      Yerushalayim, Jerusalem District, Israel
  • 1978–2012
    • Tel Aviv University
      • • Department of Communication Disorders
      • • Department of Physiology and Pharmacology
      Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • 1970–2012
    • Hebrew University of Jerusalem
      • • Department of Medical Neurobiology
      • • Department of Physiology
      • • Shaare Zedek Medical Center
      Jerusalem, Jerusalem District, Israel
  • 2000–2011
    • Shaare Zedek Medical Center
      • Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
      Yerushalayim, Jerusalem District, Israel
  • 2003
    • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
      • Faculty of Health Sciences
      Beersheba, Southern District, Israel
  • 1996
    • The University of Georgia (Tbilisi)
      Tbilsi, T'bilisi, Georgia
  • 1995
    • Sheba Medical Center
      Gan, Tel Aviv, Israel