Are you Ahmed A Othman?

Claim your profile

Publications (1)2.96 Total impact

  • Article: An oral TRPV1 antagonist attenuates laser radiant-heat-evoked potentials and pain ratings from UV(B) -inflamed and normal skin.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AIMS: Laser (radiant-heat) evoked potentials (LEPs) from vertex-EEG Peak-to-Peak (PtP) amplitude were used to determine acute antinociceptive/ antihyperalgesic efficacy of ABT-102, a novel TRPV1 antagonist efficacious in preclinical pain models, compared to active controls and placebo in normal and UV(B) -inflamed skin. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind, intra-individual-crossover trial. Twenty-four healthy subjects received six sequences of single doses of ABT-102 (0.5, 2, 6 mg), etoricoxib 90 mg, tramadol 100 mg, and placebo. Painful stimuli were induced by CO (2) -laser on normal and UV(B) -inflamed skin. LEPs and visual analog scale (VAS-Pain) ratings were taken at baseline and hourly up to 8 hours post-dose from both skin types. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, significant mean decreases in the primary variable of LEP PtP-amplitude from UV(B) -inflamed skin were observed with ABT-102 6 mg (P < 0.001), ABT-102 2 mg (P = 0.002), tramadol 100 mg (P < 0.001), and etoricoxib 90 mg (P = 0.001) over the 8-hour period; ABT-102 0.5 mg was similar to placebo. ABT-102 6 mg was superior to active controls over the 8-hour period (P < 0.05) whereas ABT-102 2 mg was comparable. Improvements in VAS scores compared to placebo were observed with ABT-102 6 mg (P < 0.001) and ABT-102 2 mg (P = 0.002). ABT-102 average plasma concentrations were 1.3, 4.4, and 9.4 ng/mL for the 0.5, 2, and 6 mg doses, respectively. There were no clinically significant safety findings. CONCLUSIONS: TRPV-1 antagonism appears promising in the management of clinical pain, but requires further investigation.
    British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 07/2012; · 2.96 Impact Factor