Publications (7)7.67 Total impact
- Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal 01/2011; 14.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Abdominal pain is one of the most frequent reasons for seeking care in an emergency department. Surveys have shown that patients are not satisfied with the pain management they receive. Reasons for giving inadequate pain management may include poor knowledge about pain assessment, myths concerning pain, lack of communication between the patient and healthcare professional, and organizational limitations. The aim of the study was to investigate the outcome of nursing assessment, pain assessment and nurse-initiated intravenous opioid analgesic compared to standard procedure for patients seeking emergency care for abdominal pain. Outcome measures were: (a) pain intensity, (b) frequency of received analgesic, (c) time to analgesic, (d) transit time, and (e) patients' perceptions of the quality of care in pain management. A quasi-experimental design with ABA phases was used. The study was conducted in an emergency department at a Swedish university hospital. Patients with abdominal pain seeking care in the emergency department were invited to participate. A total of 50, 100 and 50 patients, respectively, were included for the three phases of the study. The inclusion criteria were: ongoing abdominal pain not lasting for more than 2 days, ≥18 years of age and oriented to person, place and time. Exclusion criteria were: abdominal pain due to trauma, in need of immediate care and pain intensity scored as 9-10. The patients' perceptions of the quality of care in pain management in the emergency department were evaluated by means of a patient questionnaire carried out in the three study phases. The intervention phase included education, nursing assessment protocol and a range order for analgesic. The nursing assessment and the nurse-initiated intravenous opioid analgesic resulted in significant improvement in frequency of receiving analgesic and a reduction in time to analgesic. Patients perceived lower pain intensity and improved quality of care in pain management. The intervention improved the pain management in the emergency department. A structured nursing assessment could also affect the patients' perceptions of the quality of care in pain management in the emergency department.International journal of nursing studies 01/2011; 48(1):13-23. · 1.91 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Forty-eight patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were randomised to intravenous infusions for 4 to 6 days with melagatran, a novel synthetic low molecular weight thrombin inhibitor, or unfractionated heparin adjusted by the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). The aim of the study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and the safety of melagatran therapy at three different doses. Steady-state plasma concentrations were rapidly achieved and maintained throughout the infusion period. The mean plasma concentrations in the low, medium and high dose groups were 0.17, 0.31 and 0.53 micromol/l, respectively. The prolongation of APTT was stable during the melagatran infusions and correlated to the plasma concentration. Phlebographically verified regression of thrombus size measured as decrease in Marder score was seen after 4 to 6 days in 8 of 12 patients, 6 of 12 patients and 5 of 11 patients in the low, medium and high dose groups of melagatran and in 5 of the heparin-treated patients. In the low dose group with melagatran, thrombus extension was seen in one patient. At the dose levels studied, melagatran was well tolerated with no clinically significant bleeding problems, suggesting that melagatran could safely be given to patients suffering from DVT.Thrombosis and Haemostasis 04/1999; 81(3):358-63. · 5.76 Impact Factor
- Lakartidningen 06/1996; 93(18):1755-7.
- Lakartidningen 105(4):205-6.
- Lakartidningen 107(43):2659-60.
Uppsala University Hospital
Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Emergency Care