-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The objective was to evaluate a dose-dense schedule of docetaxel followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced breast cancer.
Ninety-nine patients were included and received 100 mg/m(2) of docetaxel every two weeks for four cycles followed by 60 mg/m(2) of doxorubicin and 600 mg/m(2) of cyclophosphamide every two weeks for four cycles. Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered systematically to all patients.
Efficacy and toxicity analyses were carried out on an intention-to-treat basis. After treatment, complete pathological response in the breast and lymph nodes was confirmed in 15 patients (15%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.4-22.9). Clinical response rate was 74% (95% CI: 65-82), of which 19% were complete responses. Breast-conserving surgery could be performed in 41% of patients. The dose-dense schedule was generally well tolerated. The most important grade 3/4 toxicities per patient were cutaneous toxicity (12.1%) and hepatic dysfunction (9.1%) during docetaxel administration, and neutropenia (28.1%) and leucopenia (8.3%) with AC.
A dose-dense schedule of docetaxel followed by AC as neoadjuvant treatment is an effective and safe treatment for locally advanced breast cancer. Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF, and possibly the change in the sequence of drug administration, appears to play a major role in avoiding the excessive toxicity of dose-dense schedules.
Clinical and Translational Oncology 09/2011; 13(9):686-91. · 1.33 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of paclitaxel/gemcitabine administered every 2 weeks in the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. Forty-three chemonaive patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast carcinoma were enrolled. Patients received paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 followed by gemcitabine 2,500 mg/m2, both on day I of a 14-day cycle, for a maximum of eight cycles. Thirty-four patients were evaluable for toxicity; 38 were evaluable for efficacy. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 54 years, the median performance status was 90, and the median number of lesions was three. Most patients (71%) had received prior adjuvant therapy. Grade 3 and 4 toxicity was limited to leukocytes (14% and 18%, respectively). Grade 3 toxicities (5% each) were thrombocytopenia, nausea and vomiting, elevation of aspartate transaminase, neurosensory, and constipation. One patient had neutropenia and fever. The objective response rate was 68% (21% complete response and 47% partial response); 18% had stable disease and 13% had partial disease. The preliminary evaluation of paclitaxel/gemcitabine given as a 2-week schedule to patients with untreated advanced breast carcinoma shows encouraging activity and a favorable toxicity profile.
Seminars in Oncology 03/2000; 27(1 Suppl 2):20-4. · 3.50 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To evaluate the anti-tumour activity and tolerance of the combination of paclitaxel plus vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients previously treated with anthracyclines.
Fifty-six MBC patients who have had at least one previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen were enrolled in this phase II trial. Patients received paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 over one-hour infusion) and vinorelbine (30 mg/m2) both on day 1 of each three-week course of therapy (maximum eight courses or until disease progression was evident).
Six complete and nineteen partial responses were observed among the fifty-four assessable patients (response rate of 46%, 95% CI: 33%-60%). Responses were observed in all disease sites and in all subsets of patients. The response rates when paclitaxel plus vinorelbine were used as first, second and third-line chemotherapy for metastases were 67%, 41% and 35%, respectively. The response rate among anthracycline-refractory patients was 46% (6 of 13). Median time to progression in the overall patient group was 28 weeks. The main toxicities (CTC grade 2 or more) were alopecia, myelosuppression and peripheral neuropathy (85%, 46% and 19% of patients, respectively). Nine patients (17%) had neutropenic fever in fifteen of the three hundred twenty-eight courses administered (5%).
The combination of paclitaxel and vinorelbine on day 1 every three weeks is active in MBC patients with prior anthracycline exposure. The regimen is safe, well tolerated and convenient for the patients.
Annals of Oncology 02/2000; 11(1):85-9. · 6.43 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: One to 10% of women with metastatic breast cancer have a recurrence of their disease as an isolated lesion (local, regional, or distant) which may be treated by surgical resection, irradiation, or both. These are patients with stage IV breast cancer with no evidence of disease, or stage IV-NED. Because natural history and prognostic factors for patients with stage IV-NED are poorly determined, we decided to evaluate a group of patients with stage IV-NED treated at a single institution.
Ninety-six patients with isolated recurrence of stage IV breast cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Treatment of loco-regional or distant recurrence was surgery in 18 patients and surgery plus irradiation in 78 patients. Seventy-nine patients received systemic therapy after loco-regional treatment (24 chemotherapy and 55 hormonotherapy). Prognostic factors were analyzed and correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
Five-year DFS and OS for the whole group were 29% and 49%, respectively. On the univariate analysis, patients without axillary nodal involvement at the time of mastectomy had significantly greater 5-year DFS and OS than patients with nodal involvement (51% vs. 14% and 70% vs. 34%, respectively, p < 0.05). DFS was also significantly better for patients receiving systemic therapy after local treatment (31% vs. 19%). On the multivariate analysis, absence of nodal involvement and systemic therapy were associated with longer DFS (p = 0.044 and p = 0.008, respectively) and OS (p = 0.009 and p = 0.011, respectively). None of the other factors analyzed including menopausal status, T-stage, number of involved nodes, receptor status, adjuvant therapy, sites of first recurrence, or time from mastectomy to first recurrence had a predictive value for DFS and OS.
Patients with stage IV-NED have poor prognosis due to early development of metastatic disease. Absence of axillary nodal involvement at the time of mastectomy and systemic therapy following local management is associated with improved DFS and OS. These results suggest that systemic therapy after local treatment in stage IV-NED is indicated. Poor prognosis in patients with previous nodal involvement warrants new approaches.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 01/1999; 53(2):105-12. · 4.43 Impact Factor
