-
D. A. McEvoy,
B. Connolly,
V. Donohue,
D. O’Halpin,
H. Rowley,
T. P. O’Dywer,
C. Timon,
J. A. McKeever,
M. A. Stokes,
J. G. Bannigan, [......],
K. H. Chan,
P. Fleming,
G. C. O’Sullivan,
K. Aizaz,
A. F. O’Donnell,
D. A. Luke,
E. M. McGovern,
N. Patil,
P. Gormley,
P. M. McCarthy
Irish Journal of Medical Science 08/1994; 163(9):417-446. · 0.58 Impact Factor
-
K. D. Carson,
S. B. Grimes,
J. M. McGinley,
M. T. Thornton,
J. Mulhall,
A. M. Bourke,
C. McCrory,
B. Marsh,
R. Hone,
D. Phelan, [......],
C. D’Arrigo,
J. Candal Couto,
J. Woof,
M. Greer,
I. Cree,
J. Belch,
S. Hone,
J. Fenton,
S. Hamilton,
D. McShane
Irish Journal of Medical Science 04/1994; 163:1-50. · 0.58 Impact Factor
-
D. O’Gradaigh,
P. J. Byrne,
P. Gillen,
P. Lawlor,
T. N. Walsh,
T. P. J. Hennessy,
S. T. O’Sullivan,
G. C. O’Sullivan,
W. O. Kirwan,
H. Li, [......],
M. McCabe, P. Kelly,
M. Leader,
C. I. Timon,
P. Gullane,
I. Dardick,
I. McCarthy,
N. F. Couse,
M. Morrin,
P. V. Delaney
Irish Journal of Medical Science 04/1994; 163(1):68-92. · 0.58 Impact Factor
-
T. T. Cooke,
R. Sheahan,
D. Foley,
G. D’Arcy,
M. Gibney,
W. Jauch,
G. Gearty,
P. Crean,
M. Walsh,
P. M. Murchan, [......],
T. Scott,
C. T. Keane,
M. Healy,
R. R. O’Moore,
E. Mulkerin,
A. Brain,
D. Hampton,
M. Penney,
K. Woodhouse,
F. Treacy
Irish Journal of Medical Science 04/1993; 162(2):49-73. · 0.58 Impact Factor
-
A. Brannigan,
N. N. Williams,
M. Grahn,
N. S. Williams,
J. M. Fitzpatrick,
P. R. O’Connell,
C. V. Soong,
P. Blair,
M. I. Halliday,
J. M. Hood, [......],
I. P. Kelly,
T. P. Corrigan,
D. McCrory,
M. McCaigue,
G. R. Barclay,
M. Quirke,
J. E. Hegarty,
D. P. O’Donoghue,
D. O’Hanlon,
J. Byrne
Irish Journal of Medical Science 09/1992; 161(10):600-619. · 0.58 Impact Factor
-
C. N. Shahi,
X. J. Fou,
A. Chua,
T. McDevitt,
M. O’Connell,
D. G. Weir,
P. W. N. Keeling,
D. Kelleher,
J. E. Crabtree,
I. J. D. Lindley, [......],
E. Orsini,
S. Chaussade,
M. Gaudric,
P. J. A. Willemse,
M. P. M. de Maat,
F. J. M. Godfroy,
E. A. R. Knot,
M.van Blankenstein,
J. H. P. Wilson,
X. J. Fan
Irish Journal of Medical Science 01/1992; 161:54-58. · 0.58 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Tibial component loosening is a major problem associated with knee prostheses. Tensile stresses in the brittle cement immediately below the tibial plateau are likely to influence loosening. To establish the stresses at selected sites in the cement layer, a large model of a tibial plateau, underlying cement and bone was constructed and three dimensional strain rosettes were embedded into it. The mechanical properties of the model materials were evaluated and compared with properties of an actual knee. The construction of the model is described and different methods for embedding the three dimensional strain rosettes into the cement are evaluated.
Strain 01/1987; 23(1):19 - 25. · 1.10 Impact Factor
-
A. R. Webb,
A. F. Bais,
M. Blumthaler,
G. P. Gobbi,
A. Kylling,
R. Schmitt,
S. Thiel,
F. Barnaba,
T. Danielsen,
W. Junkermann,
A. Kazantzidis, P. Kelly,
R. Kift,
G. L. Liberti,
M. Misslbeck,
B. Schallhart,
J. Schreder,
C. Topaloglou
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Results are presented from the Actinic Flux Determination from Measurements of Irradiance (ADMIRA) campaign to measure spectral global UV irradiance and actinic flux at the ground, beneath an atmosphere well defined by supporting measurements. Actinic flux is required to calculate photolysis rates for atmospheric chemistry, yet most spectral UV measurements are of irradiance. This work represents the first part of a project to provide algorithms for converting irradiances to actinic fluxes with specified uncertainties. The campaign took place in northern Greece in August 2000 and provided an intercomparison of UV spectroradiometers measuring different radiation parameters, as well as a comprehensive radiation and atmospheric dataset. The independently calibrated spectroradiometers measuring irradiance and actinic flux agreed to within 5%, while measurements of spectral direct irradiance differed by 9%. Relative agreement for all parameters proved to be very stable during the campaign. A polarization problem in the Brewer spectrophotometer was identified as a problem in making radiance distribution measurements with this instrument. At UV wavelengths actinic fluxes F were always greater than the corresponding irradiance E by a factor between 1.4 and 2.6. The value of the ratio F: E depended on wavelength, solar zenith angle, and the optical properties of the atmosphere. Both the wavelength and solar zenith angle dependency of the ratio decreased when the scattering in the atmosphere increased and the direct beam proportion of global irradiance decreased, as expected. Two contrasting days, one clear and one with higher aerosol and some cloud, are compared to illustrate behavior of the F : E ratio.
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 19(7):1049-1062. · 2.26 Impact Factor
