Anna L Ells

Publications (2)2.61 Total impact

• Article: The Challenge of Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity.

  Clare M Wilson, Anna L Ells, Alistair R Fielder
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Screening for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and the optimum treatment of sight-threatening disease requires detailed understanding of the infants at risk and timely identification. Despite a plethora of guidelines, not all populations and situations are adequately covered, so that what should be preventable visual disability still occurs. This article considers the design of screening guidelines and the possibility of a global guideline, although in certain parts of the world manpower for ROP screening is not available. Algorithms linked to the increase in weight of preterm infants over time may refine the number of babies needing to undergo treatment.
  Clinics in perinatology 06/2013; 40(2):241-259. · 1.54 Impact Factor
• Article: Digital image analysis in retinopathy of prematurity: a comparison of vessel selection methods.

  Clare M Wilson, Karen Wong, Jeffery Ng, Kenneth D Cocker, Anna L Ells, Alistair R Fielder
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: To evaluate vessel selection methods to distinguish between eyes with and without retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and between different stages of ROP when quantifying the associated vessel changes in width and tortuosity semiautomatically from digital retinal images. Color digital images from 75 infants screened for ROP were cropped to a standardized diameter of 240 pixels and evaluated by semiautomated vessel analysis software, Computer-Aided Image Analysis of the Retina (CAIAR), to measure retinal vessel width and tortuosity. Two methods of vessel selection were used: (1) clinical observer selecting the most prominent arteriole or venule in each retinal quadrant (4-vessel analysis) and then separately the 4 most prominent arterioles and venules from each quadrant (8-vessel analysis); (2) CAIAR selecting, regardless of retinal quadrant, the 4 widest or most tortuous arterioles or venules. Selected vessels were measured by CAIAR for tortuosity and width. When comparing ROP stages, whether observer or CAIAR selected and whether 4 or 8 vessels were analyzed, we found that arteriolar tortuosity was significantly greater with advancing ROP stage for stage 0 versus stage 2; stage 0 or 1 versus stage 3; stages 1+2 combined versus stage 3; and stage 0 versus 1+2+3 combined (P < 0.01). Venular tortuosity was significantly greater with advancing ROP stage for stage 0 versus stage 3 and stage 0 versus stages 1 and 2+3 combined (P < 0.01). Width parameters did not help us to distinguish between stages. Distinguishing between arterioles and venules is not necessary to differentiate stage 0 ROP from stage 2 or 3 ROP when one is using CAIAR. Tortuosity shows more promise than width at providing a reliable vessel parameter for distinguishing between eyes without and with ROP.
  Journal of AAPOS: the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus / American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus 06/2012; 16(3):223-8. · 1.07 Impact Factor