[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Objectives:
The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, causes, and predictors of unplanned hospital readmissions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
Data regarding unplanned hospital readmissions after TAVR in a real-world all-comers population are scarce.
A total of 720 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR at 2 centers who survived the procedure, were included. Median follow-up was 23 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 12 to 39 months), available in 99.9% of the initial population. The occurrence, timing, and causes of hospital readmission within the first year post-TAVR were obtained in all cases. Early and late readmissions were defined as those occurring ≤30 days and >30 days to 1 year post-TAVR, respectively.
There were 506 unplanned readmissions in 316 patients (43.9%) within the first year post-TAVR (median time: 63 days; IQR: 19 to 158 days post-discharge). Of these, early readmission occurred in 105 patients (14.6%), and 118 patients (16.4%) had multiple (≥2) readmissions. Readmissions were due to noncardiac and cardiac causes in 59% and 41% of cases, respectively. Noncardiac readmissions included, in order of decreasing frequency, respiratory, infection, and bleeding events as the main causes, whereas heart failure and arrhythmias accounted for most cardiac readmissions. The predictors of early readmission were periprocedural major bleeding complications (p = 0.001), anemia (p = 0.006), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.042), and the combined presence of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy at hospital discharge (p = 0.021). The predictors of late readmission were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.001), peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.023), chronic renal failure (p = 0.058), and atrial fibrillation (p = 0.015). Early readmission was an independent predictor of mortality during the follow-up period (hazard ratio: 1.56, 95% confidence interval: 1.02 to 2.39, p = 0.043).
The readmission burden after TAVR in an all-comers population was high. Nearly one-fifth of the patients were readmitted early after hospital discharge, increasing the risk of mortality at follow-up. Reasons for readmission were split between noncardiac and cardiac causes, with respiratory causes and heart failure as the main diagnoses in each group, respectively. Whereas early readmissions were mainly related to periprocedural bleeding events, most late readmissions were secondary to baseline patient comorbidities. These results underscore the importance of and provide the basis for implementing specific preventive measures to reduce readmission rates after TAVR.
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: After very rapid advances in the development of the technique and devices, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (named TAVI or TAVR), is today a reality that is here to stay. It has become the minimally-invasive treatment option for high-risk and non-surgical patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Requiring the participation of a multidisciplinary team for its implementation, cardiac imaging plays an important role. From pre-assessment to determine the suitability of the patient, the access site, the type of device, to the guidance during the procedure, and ultimately the long term monitoring of the patient. Correct selection of the patient and device, correct placement of the stent-valve and early detection of complications are of paramount importance for procedural success and for patient outcome. Each technique has advantages and disadvantages, being the cardiologist who will determine the best approach according to the type of patient and the expertise of the center in each one of them. This article summarizes the last contributions of the most common used imaging techniques, in each step of the procedure.
World Journal of Cardiology (WJC) 04/2015; 7(4):178-186. DOI:10.4330/wjc.v7.i4.178 · 2.06 Impact Factor
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: -Aortic dissection type A is a high mortality disease. Iatrogenic aortic dissection after interventional procedures is infrequent and prognostic data are scarce. Our objective was to analyze its incidence, patient profile and long-term prognosis.
-Between 2000 and 2014, we retrospectively analyzed 74 patients with dissection of the ascending aorta. Clinical and procedural data were reviewed and later, we performed a prospective clinical follow-up by telephone or in office. We recorded 74 patients. Incidence was 0.06%. Our patients, predominantly male (67.6%) had a mean age of 66.9±10.8years. With multiple cardiovascular risk factors, the main cause for cardiac catheterization was an acute coronary syndrome, in 54. The complication was detected acutely in all, trying to engage the right coronary artery in 47, the left main in 30 and after other maneuvers in 2, mostly in complex therapeutic procedures (78.4%). A coronary artery was involved in 45 patients (60.8%). Thirty five patients underwent an angioplasty and stent implantation, 3 cardiac surgery and 36 were managed conservatively. Two patients died of cardiogenic shock after the dissection. After a median follow-up of 51.2 (16.4-104.8) months, none of the remaining patients developed complications due to the dissection, progression, ischemia, pain or dissection recurrence.
-Iatrogenic catheter dissection of the aorta is a rare complication that carries an excellent short and long-term prognosis, adopting a conservative approach. When a coronary artery is involved as an entry point, usually it can be safely sealed with a stent with good long-term outcomes.
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: This article summarizes the main developments reported in 2014 on ischemic heart disease, together with the most important innovations in intensive cardiac care.
Revista Espa de Cardiologia 02/2015; 68(3). DOI:10.1016/j.recesp.2014.11.013 · 3.79 Impact Factor
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: A 58-year-old man presented to our hospital with effort angina. Ten months prior, he was treated with a Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS). During the current admission, an image angiographically compatible with in-BVS restenosis at the circumflex ostium with a radiolucent image in the ostial left anterior descending artery was shown. BVS failure is very infrequent and this is one of the first cases of BVS restenosis described. Thus, data on the best management option are scarce. We treated it like a drug-eluting stent restenosis, performing first an intracoronary optical coherence tomography scan in order to identify the left descending radiolucent image and to prepare the best treatment strategy.
The Journal of invasive cardiology 12/2014; 26(12):E164-6. · 0.95 Impact Factor