Publications (2)6.44 Total impact
-
Article: Expression of CRFR1 and Glu5R mRNA in different brain areas following repeated testing in mice that differ in habituation behaviour.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Our recent studies revealed a profound impairment to habituate in 129P3 mice compared to BALB/c mice after repeated exposure to an initially novel environment. This was accompanied by strain-specific c-Fos expression in the prelimbic cortex, a brain area related to emotional and cognitive processing. The metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu5R) antagonist MPEP increased c-Fos expression in brain areas related to cognition while it decreased c-Fos expression in brain areas processing emotions in 129P3 animals. We hypothesised that the non-adaptive response of 129P3 mice to a novel environment may be the result of impaired neural processing between the prelimbic cortex and emotion processing brain areas, possibly regulated by glutamatergic neurotransmission. To explore this hypothesis, we compared c-Fos activity in between naïve and repeatedly tested animals. Further, we investigated mRNA expression of CRFR1 and mGlu5R in the prelimbic cortex and amygdala, since these transmitter systems are not only involved in the regulation of anxiety, but are indicated to be co-expressed in relevant brain areas. Behavioural results confirmed strain-specific habituation profiles and strain-specific c-Fos expression in brain areas regulating cognitive and emotional processes in BALB/c and 129P3 mice. We found that repeated testing resulted in contrasting behavioural responses in both strains, and this was accompanied by strain-specific effects on c-Fos and receptor-expression. From these results it may be concluded that habituation in BALB/c mice reflects a shift from a primary emotional response to a more cognitively controlled behaviour, and that this shift over time may be impaired in 129P3 animals.Behavioural brain research 02/2013; · 3.22 Impact Factor -
Article: A test to identify judgement bias in mice.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Emotional states are known to affect cognitive processes. For example highly anxious individuals interpret ambiguous stimuli more negatively than low anxious people, an effect called negative judgement bias. Recently, the measurement of judgement bias has been used to try and indicate emotional states in animals. In the present experiment a potential test for judgement bias in mice was examined. Mice were trained with two distinct odour cues (vanilla or apple) predicting either a palatable or an unpalatable almond piece. Subsequently their reaction to mixtures of both odours, the ambiguous stimuli, was investigated. Mice of the BALB/cJ and 129P3/J inbred mouse strains (high initial anxiety and low initial anxiety phenotypes respectively) were tested. While BALB/cJ mice showed odour association learning and showed intermediate reactions to the ambiguous cues, 129P3/J mice did not discriminate between the cues. Additionally BALB/cJ mice that were tested under more aversive white light conditions revealed a higher latency to approach the almond piece than mice tested under less aversive red light conditions. The ambiguous stimulus however was interpreted as negative under both test conditions. Brain c-Fos expression levels (a marker for neuronal activity) differed between the BALB/c/J and 129P3/J in the lateral amygdala and the prelimbic cortex, indicating differences in ambiguous information processing between the strains. The behavioural results suggest that the present judgement bias test might be used to assess emotional states in at least BALB/c mice, however further research on both behaviour and on the involved brain mechanisms is necessary to confirm this idea.Behavioural brain research 04/2012; 233(1):45-54. · 3.22 Impact Factor
