Publications (2)5.85 Total impact
-
Article: Molecular dynamics and free energy studies on the carboxypeptidases complexed with peptide/small molecular inhibitor: mechanism for drug resistance.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: As one potent plant protease inhibitor, potato carboxypeptidase inhibitor (PCI) can competitively inhibit insect digestive metallocarboxypeptidases (MCPs) through interfering with its digestive system that causes amino acid deficiencies and leading to serious developmental delay and mortality. However, this effective biological pest control is significantly impaired by the PCI-resistant insect MCPs. Therefore, deep understanding of the resistant mechanism of insect MCPs is particularly necessary for designing new durable pest control regimen and developing effective pesticides. In this study, the binding of PCI and small molecular inhibitor THI to insect PCI-sensitive/-resistant MCPs and human MCP was investigated by docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and thermodynamic analysis. The structural analysis from MD simulations indicates that the PCI-resistant mechanism of CPBHz is mainly dominated by the Trp277A, which changes the conformation of β8-α9 loop and therefore narrow the access to the active site of CPBHz, prohibiting the entrance of the C termini tail of PCI. Additionally, the insertion of Gly247A weakens the stabilization of CPBHz and PCI through disrupting the hydrogen bond formation with its surrounding residues. Furthermore, the predicted binding free energies gives explanation of structure affinity relationship of PCI and THI with MCPs and suggest that the electrostatic energy is the main contribution term affecting the difference in binding affinities. Finally, the decomposition analysis of binding free energies infers that the key residues Glu72, Arg127, Ile247/Leu247 and Glu270 are critical for the binding of PCI/THI to MCPs.Insect biochemistry and molecular biology 04/2012; 42(8):583-95. · 3.25 Impact Factor -
Article: Identification of Novel Potential β-N-Acetyl-D-Hexosaminidase Inhibitors by Virtual Screening, Molecular Dynamics Simulation and MM-PBSA Calculations.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Chitinolytic β-N-acetyl-d-hexosaminidases, as a class of chitin hydrolysis enzyme in insects, are a potential species-specific target for developing environmentally-friendly pesticides. Until now, pesticides targeting chitinolytic β-N-acetyl-d-hexosaminidase have not been developed. This study demonstrates a combination of different theoretical methods for investigating the key structural features of this enzyme responsible for pesticide inhibition, thus allowing for the discovery of novel small molecule inhibitors. Firstly, based on the currently reported crystal structure of this protein (OfHex1.pdb), we conducted a pre-screening of a drug-like compound database with 8 × 10(6) compounds by using the expanded pesticide-likeness criteria, followed by docking-based screening, obtaining 5 top-ranked compounds with favorable docking conformation into OfHex1. Secondly, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations are performed for the five complexes and demonstrate that one main hydrophobic pocket formed by residues Trp424, Trp448 and Trp524, which is significant for stabilization of the ligand-receptor complex, and key residues Asp477 and Trp490, are respectively responsible for forming hydrogen-bonding and π-π stacking interactions with the ligands. Finally, the molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM-PBSA) analysis indicates that van der Waals interactions are the main driving force for the inhibitor binding that agrees with the fact that the binding pocket of OfHex1 is mainly composed of hydrophobic residues. These results suggest that screening the ZINC database can maximize the identification of potential OfHex1 inhibitors and the computational protocol will be valuable for screening potential inhibitors of the binding mode, which is useful for the future rational design of novel, potent OfHex1-specific pesticides.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 01/2012; 13(4):4545-63. · 2.60 Impact Factor
