J. Mitard,
K. Martens,
B. DeJaeger,
J. Franco, C. Shea,
C. Plourde,
F.E. Leys,
R. Loo,
G. Hellings,
G. Eneman,
Wei-E Wang,
J.C. Lin,
B. Kaczer,
K. DeMeyer,
T. Hoffmann,
S. DeGendt,
M. Caymax,
M. Meuris,
M.M. Heyns
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In this study, we report a direct comparison between two epitaxial silicon processes: 500degC using SiH<sub>4</sub> and 350degC using Si<sub>3</sub>H<sub>8</sub>. Following four different metrics, we demonstrate that the reduction of silicon growth temperature results into the introduction of negatively charged defects possibly located at the Si/SiO<sub>2</sub>interface. However, the Epi Si growth at 350degC with Si<sub>3</sub>H<sub>8</sub> remains beneficial compared to a growth performed at 500degC-SiH<sub>4</sub> especially when thin EOT Ge pFETs are targeted.
Solid State Device Research Conference, 2009. ESSDERC '09. Proceedings of the European; 10/2009