Publications (2)8.82 Total impact
-
Article: Physiologic basis for understanding quantitative dehydration assessment.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Dehydration (body water deficit) is a physiologic state that can have profound implications for human health and performance. Unfortunately, dehydration can be difficult to assess, and there is no single, universal gold standard for decision making. In this article, we review the physiologic basis for understanding quantitative dehydration assessment. We highlight how phenomenologic interpretations of dehydration depend critically on the type (dehydration compared with volume depletion) and magnitude (moderate compared with severe) of dehydration, which in turn influence the osmotic (plasma osmolality) and blood volume-dependent compensatory thresholds for antidiuretic and thirst responses. In particular, we review new findings regarding the biological variation in osmotic responses to dehydration and discuss how this variation can help provide a quantitative and clinically relevant link between the physiology and phenomenology of dehydration. Practical measures with empirical thresholds are provided as a starting point for improving the practice of dehydration assessment.American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 01/2013; · 6.67 Impact Factor -
Article: Hydration assessment using the cardiovascular response to standing.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The cardiovascular response to standing (sit-to-stand change in heart rate; SSΔHR) is commonly employed as a screening tool to detect hypohydration (body water deficit). No study has systematically evaluated SSΔHR cut points using different magnitudes or different types of controlled hypohydration. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the often proposed 20 b/min SSΔHR cut point using both hypertonic and isotonic models of hypohydration. Thirteen healthy young adults (8M, 5F) underwent three bouts of controlled hypohydration. The first bout used sweating to elicit large losses of body water (mass) (>3 % sweat). The second two bouts were matched to elicit 3 % body mass losses (3 % diuretic; 3 % sweat). A euhydration control trial (EUH) was paired with each hypohydration trial for a total of six trials. Heart rate was assessed after 3-min sitting and after 1-min standing during all trials. SSΔHR was compared among trials, and receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was used to determine diagnostic accuracy of the 20 b/min SSΔHR cut point. Volunteers lost 4.5 ± 1.1, 3.0 ± 0.6, and 3.2 ± 0.6 % body mass during >3 % sweat, 3 % diuretic, and 3 % sweat trials, respectively. SSΔHR (b/min) was 9 ± 8 (EUH), 20 ± 12 (>3 % sweat; P < 0.05 vs. EUH), 17 ± 7 (3 % diuretic; P < 0.05 vs. EUH), and 13 ± 11 (3 % sweat). The 20 beats/min cut point had high specificity (90 %) but low sensitivity (44 %) and overall diagnostic accuracy of 67 %. SSΔHR increased significantly in response to severe hypertonic hypohydration and moderate isotonic hypohydration, but not moderate hypertonic hypohydration. However, the 20 beats/min cut point afforded only marginal diagnostic accuracy.Arbeitsphysiologie 04/2012; · 2.15 Impact Factor
