Publications (2)0 Total impact
-
Article: [Hemodynamic and efficacies of domestic levosimendan versus dobutamine in patients with acute decompensated heart failure].
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To compare the hemodynamic effects of domestic levosimendan versus dobutamine on patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). A total of 78 ADHF patients with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥ 15 mm Hg and cardiac index (CI) ≤ 2.5 L×min(-1)×m(-2) were enrolled into this blind, positive-controlled, randomized and multicenter study to receive 24 h intravenous levosimendan or dobutamine therapy. They were randomized into 2 groups: levosimendan and dobutamine (n = 39 each). In the levosimendan group, the PCWP 24 h decreased significantly ((14.2 ± 7.6) vs (23.1 ± 8.1) mm Hg, P < 0.01)and CI increased significantly versus the baseline levels ((2.8 ± 0.7) L×min(-1)×m(-2) vs (2.0 ± 0.4) L×min(-1)×m(-2), P < 0.01). As compared with the dobutamine group, the change percentages versus baseline in PCWP, pulmonary arterial mean pressure (PAMP), systemic vascular resistance (SVR) at 24 h (median) decreased or increased significantly in the levosimendan group 45.5% vs 22.1% (P < 0.05); 20.8% vs 15.0% (P < 0.05); 34.5% vs 12.7% (P < 0.01); CI increased 39.8% vs 13.5% (P < 0.01). As compared with the baseline level, LVEF increased at 24 h in the levosimendan group (27.4% ± 6.1% vs 32.5% ± 8.7%, P < 0.05). Both PCWP and CI at 24 h correlated significantly with NT-proBNP at Day 3 (r = 0.31, P < 0.01; r = -0.29, P < 0.05). Dyspnea improved greatly at 24 h in the levosimendan group than that in the dobutamine group. As compared with dobutamine, domestic levosimendan may bring about better outcomes of hemodynamics and dyspnea.Zhonghua yi xue za zhi 02/2012; 92(8):555-8. -
Article: [Comparison on efficacy and safety between domestic levosimendan versus dobutamine for patients with acute decompensated heart failure].
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To compare the efficacy and safety of domestic levosimendan versus dobutamine for patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). ADHF patients from 8 medical centers were recruited in this multicenter, blind, positive-controlled, randomized study and received 24 h intravenous levosimendan (n = 114) or dobutamine (n = 114) therapy. SWAN-GANZ catheter was performed in patients with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥ 15 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) and cardiac index (CI) ≤ 2.5 L·min(-1)×m(-2) (n = 39 each). Compared with baseline level, LVEF increased [(31.56 ± 9.69)% vs. (28.44 ± 7.08)%, P < 0.01] at 24 h in both groups. LVEF increase at 24 h was similar between two groups [(3.11 ± 6.90)% vs. (3.00 ± 6.63)%, P > 0.05]. The PCWP decrease at 24 h was significantly greater in levosimendan group than in dobutamine group [(-8.90 ± 7.14) mm Hg vs. (-5.64 ± 6.83) mm Hg, P = 0.04]. Decrease in NT-proBNP at 3 days was also more significant in levosimendan group than in dobutamine group [the percentage change compared to baseline: (-22.36 ± 38.98)% vs. (-8.56 ± 42.42)%, P < 0.01]. Dyspnea improvement at 24 h was more significant in levosimendan group than in dobutamine group. The incidences of adverse reactions and events were similar between two groups. LVEF improvement is similar between dobutamine and domestic levosimendan while greater decreases in PCWP and NT-proBNP are achieved with domestic levosimendan in patients with ADHF.Zhonghua xin xue guan bing za zhi [Chinese journal of cardiovascular diseases] 02/2012; 40(2):153-6.
