-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine the age-dependent variations of calcaneal quantitative ultrasonometry (QUS) and the association with sex hormones and biochemical bone turnover markers in a large sample of unselected healthy German men. Bone measurements are expected to behave differently among men and women. The speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), and stiffness index (SI) of the os calcaneus were measured in 506 German men aged 20-79yr (mean age: 45.7yr). Additionally, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol, prolactin, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) as well as N-terminal propeptide of human procollagen type I (PINP), C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP), osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and CrossLaps were measured with standardized essays and correlated with the QUS results. The QUS results comprised an overall change of 12.4%, 3.2%, and 23.2% for BUA, SOS, and SI, respectively, between the 20-29 and 70-79yr age groups (p ≤ 0.001). The annual rate of the age-related differences was 0.33% (standard deviation [SD]: 0.31), 0.06% (SD: 0.08), and 0.53% (SD: 0.56) for BUA, SOS, and SI, respectively. Testosterone and DHEA-S were significantly associated with QUS parameters and increasing age, whereas SHBG showed an age-related increase and was inversely related with QUS values (p < 0.05). Bone turnover markers present lower values gradually, and we found a significant correlation between carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks (CTX), osteocalcin (OC), bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), and QUS variables (p < 0.05).
Journal of Clinical Densitometry 04/2013; · 1.29 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: Adjuvant treatment for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with aromatase inhibitors is associated with increased bone loss depending on the compliance to treatment. METHODS: In this bone substudy, bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 12- and 24-month treatment in 63 patients receiving Anastrozole as adjuvant treatment for hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. To minimize the effects of confounders, a matched pair analysis (compliant N = 21, non-compliant N = 21) was performed. RESULTS: Anastrozole treatment in compliant patients leads to a decrease in BMD (g/cm(2)) at lumbar spine and total hip from baseline to 12 and 24 months (-2.57 % P = 0.004; -2.02 % P = 0.05; -2.57 % P = 0.001 and -4.18 % P = 0.003, respectively) compared to non-compliant patients (-1.71 % P = 0.050; -2.00 % P = 0.085; -1.65 % P = 0.055 and -3.20 % P = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Anastrozole treatment in compliant patients with breast cancer resulted in a larger, increase in bone loss at 12 and 24 months compared to non-compliant patients. Bone loss stabilized in both groups at the spine from 12- to 24-month treatment, whereas maintained at the total hip.
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 02/2013; · 2.56 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate an oral low-dose estrogen therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) and quantitative ultrasonometry (QUS) in osteopenic postmenopausal women. Material and methods: This prospective, open-label cohort study investigated 120 postmenopausal hysterectomized women. Forty-seven women had been treated with 0.3 mg conjugated equine estrogen daily (ET). Primary end point was the change in BMD at the spine after 24 months. Secondary end points were among other changes in QUS at the os calcis and phalanges. Results: After matching 42 participants in the ET group, 42 controls were analyzed. The change in BMD differed significantly after 24 months (p = 0.019). Women on ET showed significant increase of spine and hip Z-score, whereas controls showed significant decreases in spine and total hip BMD. In QUS of the os calcis and the phalanges, a number of variables showed a significant improvements with ET. Conclusion: Our results comprised a positive effect of an oral low-dose estrogen therapy on BMD. Limitations of the study are the small sample size and the open-label, non-randomized cohort study design. The findings are in accordance to the common literature and support the use of ET in the primary prevention of postmenopausal bone loss.
Gynecological Endocrinology 07/2012; · 1.58 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Osteoporosis can be effectively treated with a number of medications. However, high persistence and compliance are required to assure efficacy. This study analyses persistence and compliance with a variety of medical interventions including p.o., i.v. and s.c. administrations in Germany.
This retrospective cohort study used a representative longitudinal database (IMS® LRx) comprising longitudinal prescription data for Germany from almost 80% of all German prescriptions of members of the German statutory health insurance system. Persistence is defined as the proportion of patients who remained on their initially prescribed therapy at 1 year. Compliance is measured indirectly based on the medication possession ratio (MPR).
A total of more than 1 million patients (1,107,482) for the period 07/2007 - 06/2009 was identified in the database who received a prescription for a bisphosphonate, strontium or PTH. Of these, 268,568 patients fulfilled further inclusion criteria and were included in the persistence and compliance analysis. At 12 months the proportion of patients that remained on treatment were 65.6% for zoledronate 5 mg; 56.6% for ibandronate i.v. 3 mg; 54.7% for PTH (teriparatide and 1-84 PTH), 51.0% for ibandronate 150 mg p.o.; 44.8% for alendronate 70 mg; 43.4% for etidronate. Other values were risedronate plus calcium 42.3%; alendronate plus vitamin D 37.8%; risedronate 35 mg 35.2%; risedronate 5 mg 30.6%; strontium ranelate 31.4% and alendronate 10 mg 17.3%.
Persistence and compliance during the treatment of osteoporosis were found to be insufficient. Treatment using the intravenous route and PTH showed the highest persistence and compliance rates and daily oral bisphosphonates the lowest. More effort to improve treatment compliance and persistence is needed to assure clinical efficacy.
International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics 05/2012; 50(5):315-22. · 1.18 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF), are available for prevention of neutropenia and reduction of its complications in cytostatic chemotherapy. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the consumption rates for various G-CSF and to compare outpatient medication costs per patient and treatment cycle.
Prescription data of statutory health insurance members in Germany (IMS®LRx database) with G-CSF prescriptions between January 2008 and July 2010 were evaluated. A period of observation of at least 6 months prior to and after the G-CSF prescription was required.
Prescription data of 8,726 patients treated with original filgrastim, 4,240 with biosimilar filgrastim, 6,456 with lenograstim, and 9,939 with pegfilgrastim were analyzed. The regression model showed statistically significant costreducing effects per cycle for treatment with lenograstim compared with non-lenograstim (-0.47 vs. original filgrastim; -0.15 vs. biosimilar filgrastim; -1.04 vs. pegfilgrastim; each p < 0.0001). This result has been adjusted for patient age, gender, number of injections, and prescribing specialist group.
Treatment with the original preparation lenograstim is significantly cheaper compared to the other two original drugs and biosimilar. The costs of G-CSF treatment with the original preparation lenograstim and the filgrastim biosimilars are in a similar range, but with a significantly lower cost for lenograstim. Compared to their reference product the biosimilars thus show a cost advantage.
International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics 04/2012; 50(4):281-9. · 1.18 Impact Factor
