E M Ribot

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, MI, USA

Are you E M Ribot?

Claim your profile

Publications (9)54.09 Total impact

  • Article: PulseNet USA standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocol for subtyping of Vibrio parahaemolyticus.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PulseNet is a national molecular subtyping network for foodborne disease surveillance composed of public health and food regulatory agencies. Participants employ molecular subtyping of foodborne pathogens using a standardized method of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for conducting laboratory-based surveillance of foodborne pathogens. The PulseNet standardized PFGE protocols are developed through a comprehensive testing process. The reproducibility of the protocol undergoes an internal evaluation at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and an external evaluation in multiple PulseNet laboratories. Here we describe the development and evaluation of a rapid PFGE protocol for subtyping Vibrio parahaemolyticus for use in PulseNet activities. The protocol was derived from the existing standardized PulseNet protocols for Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Vibrio cholerae. An external evaluation of this protocol was undertaken in collaboration with three PulseNet USA participating public health laboratories. Comparative analysis of the PFGE fingerprints generated by each of these laboratories demonstrated that the protocol is both reliable and reproducible in the hands of multiple users.
    Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 02/2007; 4(3):285-92. · 2.26 Impact Factor
  • Article: Development and validation of a PulseNet standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocol for subtyping of Vibrio cholerae.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PulseNet is a network that utilizes standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) protocols with the purpose of conducting laboratory-based surveillance of foodborne pathogens. PulseNet standardized PFGE protocols are subject to rigorous testing during the developmental phase and careful evaluation during a validation process assessing its robustness and reproducibility in different laboratories. Here we describe the development and validation of a rapid PFGE protocol for subtyping Vibrio cholerae for use in PulseNet International activities. While the protocol was derived from the existing PulseNet protocol for Escherichia coli O157, various aspects of this protocol were optimized for use with V. cholerae, most notably a change of the primary and secondary restriction enzyme to SfiI and NotI, respectively, and the use of a two-block electrophoresis program. External validation of this protocol was undertaken through a collaboration between three PulseNet Asia Pacific laboratories (Public Health Laboratory Centre, Hong Kong, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan, and International Center for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research-Bangladesh) and PulseNet USA. Comparison of PFGE patterns generated by each of the participating laboratories demonstrated that the protocol is robust and reproducible.
    Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 02/2006; 3(1):51-8. · 2.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: PulseNet USA: a five-year update.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PulseNet USA is the molecular surveillance network for foodborne infections in the United States. Since its inception in 1996, it has been instrumental in detection, investigation and control of numerous outbreaks caused by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:[H7] (STEC O157), Salmonella enterica, Listeria monocytogenes, Shigella spp., and Campylobacter. This paper describes the current status of the network, including the methodologies used and its future possibilities. The currently preferred subtyping method in the network is pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), a proven highly discriminatory molecular subtyping method. New simpler sequencebased subtyping methods are under development and validation to complement and eventually replace PFGE. PulseNet is essentially a cluster detection network, but the data in the system will now also be used in attribution analyses of sporadic infections. The PulseNet platform will also be used as a primary tool in preparedness and response to acts of food bioterrorism.
    Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 02/2006; 3(1):9-19. · 2.26 Impact Factor
  • Article: Rapid pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocol for subtyping of Campylobacter jejuni.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We developed a rapid pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) protocol for subtyping Campylobacter isolates based on the standardized protocols used by PulseNet laboratories for the subtyping of other food-borne bacterial pathogens. Various combinations of buffers, reagents, reaction conditions (e.g., cell suspension concentration, lysis time, lysis temperature, and restriction enzyme concentration), and electrophoretic parameters were evaluated in an effort to devise a protocol that is simple, rapid, and robust. PFGE analysis of Campylobacter isolates can be completed in 24 to 30 h using this protocol, whereas the most widely used current protocols require 3 to 4 days to complete. Comparison of PFGE patterns obtained in six laboratories showed that subtyping results obtained using this protocol are highly reproducible.
    Journal of Clinical Microbiology 06/2001; 39(5):1889-94. · 4.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Evaluation of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in epidemiological investigations of meningococcal disease outbreaks caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since 1990, the frequency of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C (NMSC) outbreaks in the United States has increased. Based on multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MEE), the current molecular subtyping standard, most of the NMSC outbreaks have been caused by isolates of several closely related electrophoretic types (ETs) within the ET-37 complex. We chose 66 isolates from four well-described NMSC outbreaks that occurred in the United States from 1993 to 1995 to evaluate the potential of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to identify outbreak-related isolates specific for each of the four outbreaks and to differentiate between them and 50 sporadic isolates collected during the outbreak investigations or through active laboratory-based surveillance from 1989 to 1996. We tested all isolates collected during the outbreak investigations by four other molecular subtyping methods: MEE, ribotyping (ClaI), random amplified polymorphic DNA assay (two primers), and serotyping and serosubtyping. Among the 116 isolates, we observed 11 clusters of 39 NheI PFGE patterns. Excellent correlation between the PFGE and the epidemiological data was observed, with an overall sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 71% at the 95% pattern relatedness breakpoint using either 1.5 or 1.0% tolerance. For all four analyzed outbreaks, PFGE would have given public health officials additional support in declaring an outbreak and making appropriate public health decisions.
    Journal of Clinical Microbiology 02/2001; 39(1):75-85. · 4.15 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Article: Emergence of domestically acquired ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella infections associated with AmpC beta-lactamase.
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ceftriaxone, an expanded-spectrum cephalosporin, is an antimicrobial agent commonly used to treat severe Salmonella infections, especially in children. Ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella infections have recently been reported in the United States, but the extent of the problem is unknown. To summarize national surveillance data for ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella infections in the United States and to describe mechanisms of resistance. Case series and laboratory evaluation of human isolates submitted to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from 17 state and community health departments participating in the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) for enteric bacteria between 1996 and 1998. Patients with ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella infections between 1996 and 1998 were interviewed and isolates with decreased ceftriaxone susceptibility were further characterized. Exposures and illness outcomes, mechanisms of resistance. The prevalence of ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella was 0.1% (1 of 1326) in 1996, 0.4% (5 of 1301) in 1997, and 0.5% (7 of 1466) in 1998. Ten (77%) of the 13 patients with ceftriaxone-resistant infections were aged 18 years or younger. The patients lived in 8 states (California, Colorado, Kansas, Massachusetts, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, and Oregon). Nine (82%) of 11 patients interviewed did not take antimicrobial agents and 10 (91%) did not travel outside the United States before illness onset. Twelve of the 15 Salmonella isolates with ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentrations of 16 microg/mL or higher were serotype Typhimurium but these isolates had different pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns. Thirteen of these 15 isolates collected between 1996 and 1998 were positive for a 631-base pair polymerase chain reaction product obtained by using primers specific for the ampC gene of Citrobacter freundii. Domestically acquired ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella has emerged in the United States. Most ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella isolates had similar AmpC plasmid-mediated resistance.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 01/2001; 284(24):3151-6. · 30.03 Impact Factor
  • Article: Rapid amplification of transposon ends for the isolation, cloning and sequencing of transposon-disrupted chromosomal genes.
    E M Ribot, F D Quinn, X Bai, J J Murtagh
    BioTechniques 02/1998; 24(1):16-7, 20, 22. · 2.67 Impact Factor
  • Article: Genetic and tissue culture systems for the study of bacterial pathogenesis.
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 11/1996; 797:19-25. · 3.15 Impact Factor
  • Article: Identification of genes specifically expressed by Mycobacterium haemophilum in association with human epithelial cells.
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 11/1996; 797:277-9. · 3.15 Impact Factor