[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Purpose: To investigate the imaging features of intrahepatic biliary cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma on B-mode and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Materials and Methods: The B-mode and contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of 6 intrahepatic biliary cystadenomas and 7 intrahepatic biliary cystadenocarcinomas were retrospectively analyzed, and the differences between cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinomas were compared. Results: There were no significant differences between cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinomas in terms of patient gender, age, lesion location, size, and shape (all p > 0.05). On conventional ultrasound, biliary cystadenomas were more likely to be multilocular (6/6 for cystadenoma vs. 2/7 for cystadenocarcinoma) and cystadenocarcinomas more likely presented the features of a mural or septal nodule and a nodule diameter > 1.0 cm (0/6 for cystadenoma vs. 5/7 for cystadenocarcinoma). On contrast-enhanced ultrasound, hyper-enhancement (n = 4) or iso-enhancement (n = 2) was present in the cystic wall, septations or mural nodules of the cystadenomas during the arterial phase and the enhancement washed out to hypo-enhancement (n = 6) during the late phase. Cystadenocarcinomas also showed hyper-enhancement (n = 4) or iso-enhancement (n = 3) in the cystic wall, septations or mural nodules during the arterial phase and iso-enhancement (n = 1) or hypo-enhancement (n = 6) during the late phase. Conclusion: Intrahepatic biliary cystadenomas are more typically multilocular cystic lesions. A mural or septal nodule and a nodule diameter greater than 1.0 cm on conventional ultrasound are suggestive of cystadenocarcinomas. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is helpful for depicting the vascularity of the lesions but there was no significant difference between cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinomas.
Ultraschall in der Medizin 11/2012; · 4.12 Impact Factor
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Objectives To assess the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-neoplastic lesion in cirrhotic liver in comparison with baseline ultrasound. Methods A total of 147 nodules (diameter ≤5.0 cm) in 133 cirrhotic patients (mean age±standard deviation: 52±13 years, range 20-82 years; gender: 111 males and 22 females) were examined with CEUS. There were 116 HCCs, 26 macroregenerative nodules and 5 high-grade dysplastic nodules. CEUS was performed with a real-time contrast-specific mode and a sulphur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent. Results Hypervascularity was observed in 94.8% (110/116) HCCs, 3.8% (1/26) macroregenerative nodules and 60.0% (3/5) high-grade dysplastic nodules during arterial phase on CEUS. Detection rates of typical vascular pattern (i.e. hypervascularity during arterial phase and subsequent washout) in HCCs with a diameter of ≤2.0 cm, 2.1-3.0 cm and 3.1-5.0 cm were 69.2% (27/39), 97.1% (33/34) and 100.0% (43/43), respectively. CEUS significantly improved the sensitivity [88.8% (103/116) vs 37.1% (43/116), p<0.001], negative predictive value [70.5% (31/44) vs 31.5% (29/92), p<0.001], and accuracy [91.2% (134/147) vs 49.0% (72/147), p<0.001] in differentiating HCCs from non-neoplastic lesions when compared with baseline ultrasound. However, the sensitivity and accuracy of CEUS for HCCs ≤2.0 cm in diameter were significantly lower than those for HCCs of 2.1-3.0 cm and 3.1-5.0 cm in diameter. Conclusions CEUS improves diagnostic performance in differentiating HCCs from non-neoplastic nodules in cirrhotic patients compared with baseline ultrasound. Diagnosis of HCCs ≤2.0 cm diameter by CEUS is still a clinical concern, and thus needs further investigation.
The British journal of radiology 05/2012; 85(1018):1376-84. · 2.11 Impact Factor
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: To investigate the correlation between enhancement patterns of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and pathological findings.
The CEUS enhancement patterns of 40 pathologically proven ICC lesions were retrospectively analysed. Pathologically, the degree of tumour cell and fibrosis distribution in the lesion was semi-quantitatively evaluated.
4 enhancement patterns were observed in the arterial phase for 32 mass-forming ICCs: peripheral rim-like hyperenhancement (n=19); heterogeneous hyperenhancement (n=6); homogeneous hyperenhancement (n=3); and heterogeneous hypo-enhancement (n=4). Among the four enhancement patterns, the differences in tumour cell distribution were statistically significant (p<0.05). The hyperenhancing area on CEUS corresponded to more tumour cells for mass-forming ICCs. Heterogeneous hyperenhancement (n=2) and heterogeneous hypo-enhancement (n=2) were observed in the arterial phase for four periductal infiltrating ICCs. In this subtype, fibrosis was more commonly found in the lesions. Heterogeneous hyperenhancement (n=1) and homogeneous hyperenhancement (n=3) were observed in the arterial phase for four intraductal growing ICCs. This subtype tended to have abundant tumour cells.
The CEUS findings of ICC relate to the degree of carcinoma cell proliferation at pathological examination. Hyperenhancing areas in the tumour always indicated increased density of cancer cells.
The British journal of radiology 02/2012; 85(1016):1029-37. · 2.11 Impact Factor