Abby A Li

Publications (2)5.01 Total impact

• Article: Acute inhalation study of allyl alcohol for derivation of acute exposure guideline levels.

  Abby A Li, Jefferson Fowles, Marcy I Banton, Catherine Picut, Daniel T Kirkpatrick
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: An acute, whole-body inhalation study for allyl alcohol in Sprague-Dawley rats was designed to support derivation of AEGL values, with emphasis on establishing NOAELs for irreversible effects of different exposure concentrations and durations. Groups of 10 rats were exposed for 1 hour (0, 50, 200, or 400 ppm), 4 hours (0, 20, 50, or 100 ppm), or 8 hours (0, 10, 20, or 50 ppm). Clinical evaluations were performed during exposure and in an open field within 22-71 minutes after termination of exposure. Clinical pathology, gross necropsy, and histopathology (nasal tissues, larynx, trachea, lungs/bronchi, liver, and kidneys) were evaluated 14 days after exposure. Mortality was limited to 1 male exposed for 8 hours to 50 ppm. Clinical findings of gasping, rales, increased respiration noted at higher exposure levels were rapidly reversed. No treatment-related findings were observed in the liver and kidneys, or in the lungs of surviving animals. Histopathology in the nasal cavity was noted at all exposure levels following 1, 4, or 8 hours of exposure. Mild nasal inflammation was found at the lowest exposure levels (50-ppm/1-hour, 20-ppm/4-hour, and 10-ppm/8-hour). These effects were considered reversible and were not associated with related clinical signs. Severe, irreversible nasal olfactory epithelial lesions were present in 50 ppm/8-hour males. The NOELs for irreversible effects were 400-ppm/1-hour, 100-ppm/4-hour, and 20-ppm/8-hour. The incidence of severe findings was positively dependent on both concentration and the exposure duration. In contrast, the incidence of mild reversible findings did not appear to be dependent on duration.
  Inhalation Toxicology 03/2012; 24(4):213-26. · 1.92 Impact Factor
• Article: Integration of epidemiology and animal neurotoxicity data for risk assessment.

  Abby A Li, Tina E Levine, Carol J Burns, W Kent Anger
  [show abstract] [hide abstract]
  ABSTRACT: Most human health risk assessments are based on animal studies that can be conducted under conditions where exposure to multiple doses of a single chemical can be controlled. Data from epidemiology studies also provide valuable information about human exposure and response to pesticides. Human studies have the potential of evaluating neurobehavioral and other outcomes that may be more difficult to evaluate in animals. The human data together with animal data can contribute to a weight-of-evidence analysis in the characterization of human health risks. Epidemiology data do, however, pose challenges with respect to characterizing human health risks. Similarly, animal data at high doses or routes of exposure not typical for humans also pose challenges to dose-response evaluations needed for risk assessments. This paper summarizes some of the presentations given at a symposium held at the Xi'an, China, International Neurotoxicology Conference held in June 2011. This symposium brought together scientists from government, industry and academia to discuss approaches to evaluating and conducting animal and human neurotoxicity studies for risk assessment purposes, using the pesticides paraquat and chlorpyrifos as case studies.
  NeuroToxicology 02/2012; 33(4):823-32. · 3.10 Impact Factor