Publications (2)6.83 Total impact
-
Article: The effect of a mediolateral episiotomy during operative vaginal delivery on the risk of developing obstetrical anal sphincter injuries.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The objective of the study was to evaluate the frequency of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in women undergoing operative vaginal deliveries (OVD) and to assess whether a mediolateral episiotomy is protective for developing OASIS in these deliveries. We performed a retrospective cohort study. Maternal and obstetrical characteristics of the 2861 women who delivered liveborn infants by an OVD at term in the years 2001-2009 were extracted from a clinical obstetrics database and were analyzed in a logistic regression model. The frequency of OASIS was 5.7%. Women with a mediolateral episiotomy were at significantly lower risk for OASIS compared with the women without a mediolateral episiotomy in case of an OVD (adjusted odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.24). We found a 6-fold decreased odds for developing OASIS when a mediolateral episiotomy was performed in OVD. Therefore, we advocate the use of a mediolateral episiotomy in all operative vaginal deliveries to reduce the incidence of OASIS.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 03/2012; 206(5):404.e1-5. · 3.28 Impact Factor -
Article: Effects of vaginal prolapse surgery on sexuality in women and men; results from a RCT on repair with and without mesh.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: In pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair, the use of synthetic mesh is not only increasing but also a subject of discussion. The focus shifts from anatomical toward functional outcome, with sexual function being an important parameter. One of the concerns with mesh usage in POP surgery is the possible negative effect on sexual function. To compare and assess sexual function in women and men after primary cystocele repair with or without trocar-guided transobturator mesh. One hundred twenty-five women with a symptomatic cystocele stage ≥ II were included in this multicenter randomized controlled trial and assessed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Female sexual function was measured by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and male sexual function by the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire. A subgroup analysis of women with a participating partner was performed. In the mesh group, 54/59 women vs. 53/62 in the anterior colporrhaphy group participated. In men, 29 vs. 30 participated. After surgery, FSFI scores were comparable for both treatment groups. However, within group analysis showed significant improvement on the domains pain (effect size = 0.5), lubrication (effect size = 0.4), and overall satisfaction (effect size = 0.5) in the colporrhaphy group. This improvement was not observed in the mesh group. A subgroup of women with a participating partner reported significantly higher baseline domain scores as compared with other women and did not report a significant improvement of sexual functioning irrespective of treatment allocation. Worsening of baseline sexual function was reported by 43% of women in the mesh group compared with 18% in anterior colporrhaphy group (P = 0.05). Male sexual functioning did not change in either group. Women after an anterior colporrhaphy report a significant and clinically relevant improvement of their sexual functioning, whereas women after a mesh procedure did not.Journal of Sexual Medicine 02/2012; 9(4):1200-11. · 3.55 Impact Factor
