Publications (74)31.99 Total impact

Article: A Roman Domination Chain
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: For a graph \(G=(V,E)\) , a Roman dominating function \(f:V\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}\) has the property that every vertex \(v\in V\) with \(f(v)=0\) has a neighbor \(u\) with \(f(u)=2\) . The weight of a Roman dominating function \(f\) is the sum \(f(V)=\sum \nolimits _{v\in V}f(v)\) , and the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on \(G\) is the Roman domination number of \(G\) . In this paper, we define the Roman independence number, the upper Roman domination number and the upper and lower Roman irredundance numbers, and then develop a Roman domination chain parallel to the wellknown domination chain. We also develop sharpness, strictness and bounds for the Roman domination chain inequalities.Graphs and Combinatorics 03/2015; DOI:10.1007/s003730151566x · 0.39 Impact Factor  [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: An unfriendly partition is a partition of the vertices of a graph G=(V,E) into two sets, say Red R(V) and Blue B(V), such that every Red vertex has at least as many Blue neighbors as Red neighbors, and every Blue vertex has at least as many Red neighbors as Blue neighbors. We present three polynomial time, selfstabilizing algorithms for finding unfriendly partitions in arbitrary graphs G, or equivalently into two disjoint dominating sets.Parallel Processing Letters 03/2013; 23(1). DOI:10.1142/S0129626413500011 
Article: Quorum colorings of graphs
AKCE International Journal of Graphs and Combinatorics 01/2013; 10(1).  [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Given a set S⊆V in a graph G=(V,E), we say that a vertex v∈V is perfect if N[v]∩S=1, that is, the closed neighborhood N[v]={v}∪{u∣uv∈E} of v contains exactly one vertex in S. A vertex v is almost perfect if it is either perfect or is adjacent to a perfect vertex. Similarly, we can say that a set S⊂V is (almost) perfect if every vertex v∈S is (almost) perfect; S is externally (almost) perfect if every vertex u∈VS is (almost) perfect; and S is completely (almost) perfect if every vertex v∈V is (almost) perfect. In this paper we relate these concepts of perfection to independent sets, dominating sets, efficient and perfect dominating sets, distance2 dominating sets, and to perfect neighborhood sets in graphs. The concept of a set being almost perfect also provides an equivalent definition of irredundance in graphs.Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing 01/2013; 85. 
Article: Analyzing graphs by degrees
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Let G=(V,E) be a graph and let N(v)={u:uv∈E} be the open neighborhood of a vertex v∈V . The degree of v, deg (v)=N(v), equals the number of vertices u that are adjacent to v. By considering the relationships between deg (v) and the degrees deg (u), for every u∈N(v), we define 10 types of vertices and study some of their properties.AKCE International Journal of Graphs and Combinatorics 01/2013; 10(4).  [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The efficiency of a set S⊆VS⊆V in a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E), is defined as ε(S)={v∈V−S:N(v)∩S=1}ε(S)={v∈V−S:N(v)∩S=1}; in other words, the efficiency of a set S equals the number of vertices in V−SV−S that are adjacent to exactly one vertex in S. A set S is called optimally efficient if for every vertex v∈V−Sv∈V−S, ε(S∪{v})⩽ε(S)ε(S∪{v})⩽ε(S), and for every vertex u∈Su∈S, ε(S−{u})<ε(S)ε(S−{u})<ε(S). We present a polynomial time selfstabilizing algorithm for finding an optimally efficient set in an arbitrary graph. This algorithm is designed using the distance2 selfstabilizing model of computation.Information Processing Letters 08/2012; 112(16):621–623. DOI:10.1016/j.ipl.2012.02.014 · 0.55 Impact Factor 
Article: Cost effective domination in graphs
01/2012;  [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Let G=(V,E) be an undirected graph and let π={V 1 ,V 2 ,⋯,V k } be a partition of the vertices V of G into k blocks V i . From this partition one can construct the following digraph D(π)=(π,E(π)), the vertices of which correspond onetoone with the k blocks V i of π, and there is an arc from V i to V j if every vertex in V j is adjacent to at least one vertex in V i , that is, V i dominates V j . We call the digraph D(π) the domination digraph of π. A triad is one of the 16 digraphs on three vertices having no loops or multiple arcs. In this paper we study the algorithmic complexity of deciding if an arbitrary graph G has a given digraph as one of its domination digraphs, and in particular, deciding if a given triad is one of its domination digraphs. This generalizes results for the domatic number.Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing 01/2012; 80. 
Article: Matchability and maximal matchings
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We present a collection of new structural, algorithmic, and complexity results for matching problems of two types. The first problem involves the computation of kmaximal matchings, where a matching is kmaximal if it admits no augmenting path with ≤2k vertices. The second involves finding a maximal set of vertices that is matchable — comprising one side of the edges in some matching. Among our results, we prove that the minimum cardinality β2 of a 2maximal matching is at most the minimum cardinality μ of a maximal matchable set, with equality attained for trianglefree graphs. We show that the parameters β2 and μ are NPhard to compute in bipartite and chordal graphs, but can be computed in linear time on a tree. Finally, we also give a simple lineartime algorithm for finding a 3maximal matching, a consequence of which is a simple lineartime 3/4approximation algorithm for the maximumcardinality matching problem in a general graph.Discrete Applied Mathematics 01/2011; 159(1):1522. DOI:10.1016/j.dam.2010.09.006 · 0.80 Impact Factor 
Article: γgraphs of graphs.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A set S⊆V is a dominating set of a graph G=(V,E) if every vertex in VS is adjacent to at least one vertex in S. The domination number γ(G) of G equals the minimum cardinality of a dominating set S in G; we say that such a set S is a γset. In this paper we consider the family of all γsets in a graph G and we define the γgraph G(γ)=(V(γ),E(γ)) of G to be the graph whose vertices V(γ) correspond 1to1 with the γsets of G, and two γsets, say D 1 and D 2 , are adjacent in E(γ) if there exists a vertex v∈D 1 and a vertex w∈D 2 such that v is adjacent to w and D 1 =D 2 {w}∪{v}, or equivalently, D 2 =D 1 {v}∪{w}. In this paper we initiate the study of γgraphs of graphs.Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory 01/2011; 31:517531. DOI:10.7151/dmgt.1562 · 0.28 Impact Factor 
Article: Emergency Response Sets in Graphs
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We introduce a kresponse set as a set of vertices where responders can be placed so that given any set of k emergencies, these responders can respond, one per emergency, where each responder covers its own vertex and its neighbors. A weak kresponse set does not have to worry about emergencies at the vertices of the set. We define Rk and rk as the minimum cardinality of such sets. We provide bounds on these parameters and discuss connections with domination invariants. For example, for a graph G of order n and minimum degree at least 2, R2(G) � 2n/3, while r2(G) � n/2 provided G is also connected and not K3. We also provide bounds for trees T of order n. We observe that there are for each k trees for which rk(T) � n/2, but that the minimum Rk(T) appears to grows with k; a novel computer algorithm is used to show that R3(T) > n/2. As expected, these parameters are NPhard to compute, and we provide a lineartime algorithm for trees for fixed k.Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing 01/2009; 68.  [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: For any given type of a set of vertices in a connected graph G=(V,E), we seek to determine the smallest integers (x,y:z) such that for all minimal (or maximal) sets S of the given type, where V>S≥2, every vertex v∈VS is within shortest distance at most x to a vertex u∈S (called dominating distance), and within distance at most y to a second vertex w∈S (called secondary distance). We also seek to determine the smallest integer z such that every vertex u∈S is within distance at most z to a closest neighbor w∈S (called internal distance). In this paper, a sequel to two previous papers [S. M. Hedetniemi et al., ibid. 5, No. 2, 103–115 (2008; Zbl 1176.05055); ibid. 6, No. 2, 239–266 (2009; Zbl 1210.05032)], we determine the secondary and internal distances (2,y:z) for 16 types of sets, all of which are distance2 dominating sets, that is, whose dominating distances are at most 2.AKCE International Journal of Graphs and Combinatorics 01/2009; 6(2). 
Article: Dominator partitions of graphs
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A vertex v∈Vin a graph G=(V,E) dominates a set S⊆V if it is adjacent to every vertex w∈S, in which case we say that v is a dominator of S. A partition π={V 1 ,V 2 ,⋯,V k } of V(G) is called a dominator partition if every vertex v∈V is a dominator of at least one block V j of π. The dominator partition number of a graph G, denoted π d (G), is the minimum order of a dominator partition of G. In this paper we introduce the concept of dominator partitions and obtain tight bounds for π d (G) for any graph G.  [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: A function � : V ! {1,...,k} is a broadcast coloring of order k if �(u) = �(v) implies that the distance between u and v is more than �(u). The minimum order of a broadcast coloring is called the broadcast chromatic number of G, and is denotedb(G). In this pa per we introduce this coloring and study its properties. In particular, we explore the relationship with the vertex cover and chromatic num bers. While there is a polynomialtime algorithm to determine whether �b(G) � 3, we show that it is NPhard to determine ifb(G) � 4. We also determine the maximum broadcast chromatic number of a tree, and show that the broadcast chromatic number of the infinite grid is finite.Ars Combinatoria Waterloo then Winnipeg 01/2008; 86. · 0.26 Impact Factor 
Article: Secondary domination in graphs
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Given a dominating set S⊆V in a graph G=(V,E), place one guard at each vertex in S. Should there be a problem at a vertex v∈VSA, we can send a guard at a vertex it u∈S adjacent to v to handle the problem. If for some reason this guard needs assistance, a second guard can be sent from S to v, but the question is: how long will it take for a second guard to arrive? This is the issue of what we call secondary domination. We focus primarily on dominating sets in which a second guard can arrive in at most two time steps. A (1,2)dominating set in a graph G=(V,E) is a set S having the property that for every vertex v∈VS there is at least one vertex in S at distance 1 from v and a second vertex in S at distance at most 2 from v. We present a variety of results about secondary domination, relating this to several other wellstudied types of domination.AKCE International Journal of Graphs and Combinatorics 01/2008; 5(2). 
Article: Irredundant colorings of graphs
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: An irredundant coloring of a graph G=(V,E) is a partition of V(G) into irredundant sets. The irratic number of a graph G equals the minimum order of an irredundant coloring of G. In this paper we introduce the study of irredundant colorings and the irratic number of a graph.01/2008; 54.  [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Gossiping and broadcasting are two problems of information dissemination described for a group of individuals connected by a communication network. In gossiping every person in the network knows a unique item of information and needs to communicate it to everyone else. In broadcasting one individual has an item of information which needs to be communicated to everyone else. We review the results that have been obtained on these and related problems.Networks 10/2006; 18(4):319  349. DOI:10.1002/net.3230180406 · 0.83 Impact Factor 
Article: Differentials in graphs
Utilitas Mathematica 03/2006; 69. · 0.35 Impact Factor 
Article: Broadcasts in graphs
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We say that a function f:V→{0,1,…,diam(G)}f:V→{0,1,…,diam(G)} is a broadcast if for every vertex v∈Vv∈V, f(v)⩽e(v)f(v)⩽e(v), where diam(G)diam(G) denotes the diameter of G and e(v)e(v) denotes the eccentricity of vv. The cost of a broadcast is the value f(V)=∑v∈Vf(v). In this paper we introduce and study the minimum and maximum costs of several types of broadcasts in graphs, including dominating, independent and efficient broadcasts.Discrete Applied Mathematics 01/2006; 154(1):5975. DOI:10.1016/j.dam.2005.07.009 · 0.80 Impact Factor  [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Abstract For a graph property P, we dene a Pmatching as a set M of disjoint edges such that the subgraph induced by the vertices incident to M has property P. Previous examples include strong/induced matchings and uniquely restricted matchings. We explore the general properties of Pmatchings, but especially the cases where P is the property of being acyclic or the property of being disconnected. We consider bounds on and the complexity of the maximum cardinality of a Pmatching and the minimum cardinality of a maximal Pmatching. Key words: matchings, graphs, induced matchingsDiscrete Mathematics 04/2005; 293(13):129138. DOI:10.1016/j.disc.2004.08.027 · 0.56 Impact Factor
Publication Stats
2k  Citations  
31.99  Total Impact Points  
Top Journals
Institutions

1984–2013

Clemson University
 School of Computing
CEU, South Carolina, United States


1997

The American University in Cairo
 Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Cairo, Muhafazat al Qahirah, Egypt


1981

University of Victoria
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
