-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study evaluated the safety and cognitive impact of patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl compared to patient-controlled analgesia with morphine among elderly postoperative patients. In addition, two screening tests for cognitive impairment, the Mini Mental Status Exam and the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire, were compared. Ninety-six elderly patients were randomly allocated to receive patient-controlled analgesia with either fentanyl or morphine following hip or knee arthroplasty. Patients were evaluated postoperatively for clinical confusion, cognitive function test results, adequacy of analgesia, drug use and complications. Fentanyl produced less depression in postoperative cognitive function compared to morphine. The incidence of clinical confusion was not statistically different between groups (4.3% for fentanyl versus 14.3% for morphine). Fentanyl patients used more opioid based on a dose ratio of 100:1 suggesting that this dose ratio is inadequate. The incidence of urinary retention was lower in the fentanyl group. A poor agreement between the two tests of cognitive impairment mandates caution when peri-operative cognitive function is compared using different tests.
Anaesthesia 02/2007; 51(4):356 - 360. · 2.96 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) using propofol has been reported to provide safe and effective sedation during a variety of procedures performed under regional or local anesthesia. In a prospective, randomized fashion, this study evaluated propofol PCS compared to anesthesiologist-administered midazolam-fentanyl sedation during interventional neuroradiologic (INR) procedures. Nineteen patients undergoing 24 INR procedures received propofol PCS (PCS dose, 0.5 mg/kg; lockout interval, 3 min) or anesthesiologist-administered midazolam-fentanyl sedation. Study parameters included discomfort, sedation and anxiety visual analogue scores (VAS), cognitive function, patient satisfaction, and complications. No difference was found between the two sedation techniques with respect to the levels of sedation and anxiolysis. Cognitive function was well preserved in both groups. Patient satisfaction was similarly high in both groups. Complications were similar between groups. These included ventilatory depression (two patients in each group) and excessive sedation (two patients in each group). Three patients in the propofol group became excessively restless, resulting in brief interruptions during the respective procedures. Propofol PCS offers a safe sedation technique during INR procedures with a sedation and anxiolysis profile that was not distinguishable from anesthesiologist-administered midazolam-fentanyl sedation.
Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology 08/1997; 9(3):237-41. · 2.23 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This prospective study evaluated the effects of propofol sedation on the incidence of intraoperative seizures and the adequacy of electrocorticographic (ECoG) recordings during awake craniotomy performed for the management of refractory epilepsy. Thirty patients scheduled for temporal or frontal lobectomy for epilepsy under bupivacaine scalp block were randomized to receive patient-controlled propofol sedation (PCS) combined with a basal infusion of propofol (n = 15) or neurolept analgesia using an initial bolus dose of fentanyl (0.7 microg/kg) and droperidol (0.04 mg/kg) followed by a fentanyl infusion (n = 15). Propofol administration was suspended 15 min before ECoG recording in the PCS group. The occurrence of inappropriate intraoperative seizures was noted and, based on blind review, the adequacy of ECoG recordings was compared. A higher incidence of intraoperative seizures was noted among the neurolept patients (6 vs 0, P = 0.008). Intraoperatively, ECoG recordings were adequate to proceed with resection in both groups. Evidence of low spike activity on ECoG did not correlate with the type of sedation administered. Higher frequency background ECoG activity was noted among patients who received propofol, but this did not interfere with ECoG interpretation. The use of propofol sedation does not appear to interfere with ECoG during epilepsy surgery, provided administration is suspended at least 15 min before recording.
Anesthesia & Analgesia 07/1997; 84(6):1280-4. · 3.29 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This prospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of patient-controlled sedation (PCS) using propofol during awake seizure surgery performed under bupivacaine scalp blocks. Thirty-seven patients were randomized to receive either propofol PCS combined with a basal infusion of propofol (n = 20) or neurolept analgesia using an initial bolus dose of fentanyl and droperidol followed by a fentanyl infusion (n = 17). Both groups received supplemental fentanyl and dimenhydrinate for intraoperative pain and nausea, respectively. Comparisons were made between groups for sedation, memory, and cognitive function, patient satisfaction, and incidence of complications. Levels of intraoperative sedation and patient satisfaction were similar between groups. Memory and cognitive function were well preserved in both groups. The incidence of transient episodes of ventilatory rate depression (<8 bpm) was more frequent among the propofol patients (5 vs 0, P = 0.04), particularly after supplemental doses of opioid. Intraoperative seizures were more common among the neurolept patients (7 vs 0, P = 0.002). PCS using propofol represents an effective alternative to neurolept analgesia during awake seizure surgery performed in a monitored care environment.
Anesthesia & Analgesia 06/1997; 84(6):1285-91. · 3.29 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Little information is available regarding the use of patient-controlled sedation (PCS) among the elderly. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of propofol PCS among elderly patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty.
Forty patients, aged 65-78 yr, undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty under regional anaesthesia were randomized to receive propofol PCS (dose = 0.3 mg.kg-1, delay = three min; n = 20) or anaesthetist-administered midazolam-fentanyl sedation (n = 20). Sedation, anxiety and discomfort visual analogue scores (VAS) were measured, by an independent observer, preoperatively, immediately at the end of surgery and one hour following admission to the postanaesthetic care unit (PACU). Cognition was evaluated, using an abbreviated Mini Mental Status Examination, preoperatively and in the PACU. Patient satisfaction, based on VAS and a brief questionnaire, was measured in the PACU. The incidence of intraoperative complications was also compared.
Patient satisfaction was high in each group. Sedation and anxiety VAS were similar in each group. A high incidence of pain with drug injection was noted among patients receiving propofol (80%). Transient deeper levels of sedation (6 vs 1; P = 0.05) were observed more commonly in the propofol PCS group.
Propofol PCS provides effective sedation. Using a propofol dose of 0.3 mg.kg-1, transient episodes of deeper sedation were noted more frequently among patients receiving PCS. These episodes did not require intervention but, suggest that this propofol PCS dose approaches the limit of safety and should be further reduced for some elderly patients.
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 05/1997; 44(4):385-9. · 2.35 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Little information is available regarding the use of patient-controlled sedation (PCS) among elderly patients undergoing operative procedures under local or regional anaesthesia. This prospective, randomized study evaluated the safety of propofol PCS, and the attitude among elderly patients toward self-administration of sedation during cataract surgery.
Prospective, randomized study conducted in a University affiliated, tertiary-care hospital. Fifty-five elderly patients (aged 65-79 yr) were randomized to receive propofol patient-controlled sedation (PCS) (n = 28) or no intraoperative sedation (n = 27) during cataract surgery performed under peribulbar block. The PCS parameters consisted of a lockout interval of three minutes and a PCS dose of 0.3 mg.kg-1. Study groups were compared with respect to sedation, anxiety and discomfort visual analogue scores (VAS), cognitive functioning, patient satisfaction and the incidence of intraoperative complications.
Patients in the PCS group administered a mean propofol dose of 65 +/- 49 mg during procedures with a mean duration of 46 min. The incidence of intraoperative complications and sedation, anxiety and discomfort VAS were similar between groups. Patient satisfaction with PCS was high. In the PCS group, 10 (35%) of the 28 patients did not use the device because they were comfortable and did not feel they needed sedation. Satisfaction was higher in the PCS group (P = 0.02), whether or not they used the PCS device, compared with patients who did not receive a PCS device.
Propofol PCS represents a safe sedation technique among elderly patients in a monitored care setting. Elderly patients appear to prefer the option of receiving some form of intraoperative sedation and respond favourably to the opportunity to control administration.
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 11/1996; 43(10):1014-8. · 2.35 Impact Factor
-
[show abstract]
[hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: This study evaluated the safety and cognitive impact of patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl compared to patient-controlled analgesia with morphine among elderly postoperative patients. In addition, two screening tests for cognitive impairment, the Mini Mental Status Exam and the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire, were compared. Ninety-six elderly patients were randomly allocated to receive patient-controlled analgesia with either fentanyl or morphine following hip or knee arthroplasty. Patients were evaluated postoperatively for clinical confusion, cognitive function test results, adequacy of analgesia, drug use and complications. Fentanyl produced less depression in postoperative cognitive function compared to morphine. The incidence of clinical confusion was not statistically different between groups (4.3% for fentanyl versus 14.3% for morphine). Fentanyl patients used more opioid based on a dose ratio of 100:1 suggesting that this dose ratio is inadequate. The incidence of urinary retention was lower in the fentanyl group. A poor agreement between the two tests of cognitive impairment mandates caution when peri-operative cognitive function is compared using different tests.
Anaesthesia 05/1996; 51(4):356-60. · 2.96 Impact Factor
