Zsuzsanna Papp

Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York, United States

Are you Zsuzsanna Papp?

Claim your profile

Publications (4)12.95 Total impact

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was conducted to determine whether significant reduction in radiation dose (250 mAs-->50 mAs), in chest computed tomography (CT) using volume acquisition affects image quality or the detectability of pathologic findings in the lung and mediastinum. Phantom studies were conducted to evaluate resolution and noise level, then a patient study was then done. Fifty consecutive patients (10 normal and 40 abnormal) cases were examined. After a scan (250 mAs, 120OkVp) of the entire thorax, five additional slices (50 mAs, 120kVp) at the level of the abnormality were obtained. Three independent observers evaluated the visibility of normal lung and mediastinal structures, as well as image noise. The mean score was compared between the standard and low doses. In a second study, an independent evaluation of the presence or absence of pathologic findings was made by four observers. Lucite phantom studies demonstrated diminished low-contrast resolution and increased noise level for the low-dose technique. Observers assessed more noise in the low-dose images (P < 0.001). The normal structures were judged to be more visible with standard dose (P < 0.01), but the magnitude of the judged differences was small especially in the lung. No differences were found in the detection of lung and mediastinal abnormalities (P > 0.10). The low-dose technique was effective in demonstrating pathologic findings for the lung and mediastinum. Low-dose spiral CT should be considered as a viable alternative to standard-dose spiral CT.
    Investigative Radiology 02/1998; 33(2):68-73. DOI:10.1097/00004424-199802000-00002 · 4.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the accuracy of CT angiography of occlusive disease of the carotid arteries using three-dimensional surface-rendered images alone and in conjunction with display of axial source images. Forty-eight symptomatic patients had conventional angiography followed by CT angiography within 24 hours. Images of 96 carotid arteries were acquired using contrast-enhanced spiral CT. Image postprocessing was performed on a free-standing workstation to produce 3-D shaded surface display (SSD) images. Two readers independently evaluated the CT angiographic (SSD) images and then reevaluated each case while simultaneously reviewing the SSD and axial source images. Digital subtraction angiograms were evaluated in a separate session and eventually compared with CT angiograms. All evaluations were performed under blinded conditions to control for reader bias. SSD images alone underestimated stenosis relative to angiograms whereas combined SSD and axial images did not. SSD angiograms in conjunction with the source images are better than SSD images alone in estimating the degree of stenosis in carotid artery disease.
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 05/1997; 18(4):759-63. · 3.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    American Journal of Roentgenology 04/1997; 168(3):813-7. DOI:10.2214/ajr.168.3.9057540 · 2.74 Impact Factor
  • Academic Radiology 12/1995; 2(12):1145. DOI:10.1016/S1076-6332(05)80573-2 · 2.08 Impact Factor